Charge correlations using balance functions of identified particles in PbâPb collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 2.76 TeV with ALICE

# Charge correlations using balance functions of identified particles in PbâPb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV with ALICE

Sk Noor Alam
for the ALICE Collaboration
sk.noor.alam@cern.ch
Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, HBNI,Kolkata India
July 26, 2019
###### Abstract

By studying the balance functions of several hadronic species, one can gain insight into the chem-ical evolution of the QuarkâGluon Plasma and radial flow. In a picture of early hadronisation,pairs of particles and anti-particles (created at the same spaceâtime point) are separated furtherin rapidity due to the higher initial temperature and diffusive interactions with other particles.Therefore delayed hadronisation will lead to strong correlations in rapidity in the final state. Inthis work, balance functions for identified charged-pion pairs measured by the ALICE detector atthe Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in PbâPb collisions at = 2.76 TeV are presented. These balance functions are presented in relative rapidity () and relative azimuthal angle (). It isobserved that the charged-pion balance function widths in and get narrower in central Pb-Pb collisions compared to peripheral collisions. The findings in this analysis are consistent withthe effects of delayed hadronisation and radial flow.

## 1 Introduction

The formation of a new state of matter produced in relativistic heavy-ion collisions called the Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) has been hypothesised to exist during the early stages of these colli-sions. The balance function (BF) is sensitive to the effects of electric charge conservation among the produced particles in high energy collisions [1, 2, 3]. When measuring the BF as a function of relative rapidity/pseudorapidity (y, ) and azimuthal angle (), it is shown that a late stage hadronisation is characterised by tightly correlated charge-anticharge pairs [4]. Early stage hadronisationis expected to result in a broad BF, while late stage hadronisation leads to a narrower distribution.The BF is constructed by the normalised net correlation between oppositely charged particles andis defined as [4, 5]

 B=12[⟨N(a,b)⟩−⟨N(a,a)⟩⟨Na⟩+⟨N(b,a)⟩−⟨N(b,b)⟩⟨Nb⟩] (1)

where a and b could be different kinds of particles with positive and negative charges. For example, a could refer to all negative particles and b to all positive particles. Here, counts pairs of opposite charges satisfying a criterion that their relative rapidity/pseudorapidity or is within a specified range, whereas , are the number of positive or negative particles in the chosen phase space. Here the angular brackets represent averaging over the events. The BF is measured by combining two types of particles called trigger and associated particles with transverse momenta and .
The single terms were constructed in two different ways, the associated yield per trigger particle  [6, 7] and the number correlation function  [8]. In this analysis a pseudorapidity range () between -0.8 and 0.8 and and range between 0.2 and 1.4 GeV/c was used. First, a two-dimensional correlation function is generated in () which is then projected on and for further studies. The BF correlation follows a characteristic structure with a peak at the near side ( = 0 , = 0). By studying BFs involving different hadronic species, and calculating the width of the BF, one can obtain insight the chemical evolution of the QGP. The BF widths are also sensitive to amount of radial flow in heavy-ion collisions  [1].

## 2 Dataset, event and track selection

The extraction of the BF with identified particles was performed on the PbPb dataset at = 2.76 TeV, which was taken in 2010. Approximately 12 M events were used. Only events with a reconstructed vertex and with z position of the vertex 10 cm were analysed. The events were divided in centrality classes, spanning of the total inelastic cross section. The most central events were analyzed in 5 bins ( and ) and the more peripheral in 10 bins. The centrality of an event was estimated by using the multiplicity distribution of signals from the V0 detectors. Primary particle tracks are reconstructed, selected  [7] and identified  [9] using the Time Projection Chamber (TPC) and Time-Of-Flight detector (TOF). Here, the method is used to identify particles with 3.

 nσ=SignalPID−SignalExpectedσ (2)

Here, signal means and relative energy loss w.r.t distance for TOF and TPC respectively. The TPC is used for identification of particles with of 0.2 to 0.6 GeV/c. The combination of TPC and TOF information have been used for identification of particles with of 0.6 to 1.4 GeV/c. Fig.1 shows TPC and TOF signals extracted from Pb-Pb collisions with = 2.76 TeV energy. In this work, we have selected pions as trigger associated particles. The correlation functions have been corrected for efficiency purity obtained from simulated data.

## 3 Results

The Width of the BF provides information on the hadronisation time of particles produced in the collisions. Width is calculated using the RMS value or the weighted average of the BF distributions projected in and . The results for identified charged pion pairs are shown in Fig.2. The correlation functions have a dip near = 0 and = 0. This dip might be a combined effect of Bose-Einstein correlations and Coulomb interactions between charged pions. Widths of the balance functions for three centrality classes are shown in Fig.3. A significant narrowing of the BF width of pions with increasing centrality is observed. The broadening of the balance functions for less central collisions is a result of a larger separation between balancing charges. This centrality dependence is consistent with two scenarios: delayed hadronisation and increasing radial flow.

## 4 Discussions

The widths of the balance functions for pions in ây and âÏ are measured in Pb-Pb collisions at = 2.76 TeV with the ALICE experiment. They are found to decrease when moving from peripheral to central collisions consistent with the picture of a delayed hadronisation scenario. On the other hand, radial flow should also produce a narrower balance function in central collisions where radial flow is the largest. Therefore, the interpretation of the observed narrowing trend requires more detailed study of its sensitivity to such other effects as flow, resonance production, and diffusion, in addition to late stage hadronisation.

## References

• [1] S. Pratt, Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 212301; S. Pratt, Phys. Rev. C85(2012) 014904.
• [2] B. I. Abelev et al. [STAR Collaboration], Physics Letters B690,(2010) 239.
• [3] D. Drijard et al., Nuclear. Phys.B166,(1980) 233.
• [4] S. A. Bass, P. Danielewicz and S. Pratt , Phys. Rev.Lett.85,(2000) 2689.
• [5] S. Jeon and S. Pratt, Phys. Rev.C65, (2002) 044902.
• [6] B. Abelev et al. [ALICE Collaboration], Physics Letters B723(2013) 267-279.
• [7] J. Adam et al. [ALICE Collaboration], Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 86.
• [8] J. Adam et al. [ALICE Collaboration], Phys.Rev.Lett.118(2017) 162302
• [9] J. Adam et al. [ALICE Collaboration], Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29(2014) 1430044.
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
• Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
• Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
• Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters