Chandra, XMM-Newton and HST observations of M31 transient T14

Chandra, XMM-Newton and Hst observations of a transient in M31 with a possible asymmetric, precessing disk

Abstract

The transient X-ray source CXOM31 004205.77+411330.43 exhibited several outbursts during our long-term monitoring campaign of monthly observations of the M31 center with Chandra. However, the decay profile appears to be unlike those observed from Galactic transients. We followed up the 2011 outburst with two B band HST/ACS observations, one in outburst and the other in quiescence, and used difference imaging to search for a counterpart; this would be dominated by re-processed X-ray emission from the disk. We found a counterpart with B = 28.210.16. An XMM-Newton observation from a previous outburst yielded a spectrum that is well described by an absorbed power law with absorption equivalent to 2.6 H atom cm and photon index 1.8; the highest quality Chandra spectrum yielded only 130 counts, and best fits consistent with the XMM-Newton results. We calculated an absolute V magnitude of +1.9 during outburst for a typical disk spectrum. An empirical relation between the ratio of X-ray to optical flux and orbital period suggests a period 4 hr for a black hole accretor. Such a short period is expected to yield an asymmetric, precessing disk, and we propose that the observed decay lightcurve is due to modulation of the mass transfer rate due to the disk precession.

keywords:
x-rays: general — x-rays: binaries
12

1 Introduction

We have been monitoring the central region of M31 with Chandra, averaging 1 observation per month over 1999–2012, in order to discover X-ray transients. Since then, we have reduced our observation rate to 5 per year. Particularly bright or otherwise interesting transients are followed up with two HST ACS observations, the first is taken a few weeks after outburst, and the second observation is normally taken 6 months later; this allows us to identify the counterpart via difference imaging (see e.g. Barnard et al., 2012, and references within). We summarized the results of the first 12 transients (labeled T1–T12) found via this effort in Barnard et al. (2012), and performed this analysis for two further transients: XMM J004243.6+412519 (known as M31 ULX2, Barnard et al., 2013a), and CXOM31 004252.457+411631.17 (referred to as T13, Barnard et al., 2014b).

In this work we report our findings for CXOM31 004205.77+411330.43, hereafter referred to as T14. We note that T14 is source number 71 in our variability survey of 528 X-ray sources within 20 of the galaxy nucleus where we made 200 new X-ray binary (XB) identifications (Barnard et al., 2014a); the 0.3–10 keV luminosities for these sources ranged over 1–6000 erg s. The initial outburst of T14 was in 2011 July; however, the second observations was made almost 3 years later, in 2014 June.

X-ray transients within the central region of M31 are most likely to contain a low mass secondary, as the majority of stars there are old (see e.g. Williams et al., 2003). Low mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) may be transient X-ray sources due to instabilities in their accretion disks; the disk has two stable phases (hot and cold), and an unstable intermediate phase— matter accumulates in the disk in the cold phase, and is rapidly dumped onto the compact object in the hot phase (see e.g. Lasota, 2001). However, the X-rays produced by accretion from the hot disk prevent the disk from cooling; the X-ray luminosity decays exponentially if the whole disk is ionised, and linearly if only part of the disk is ionised(King & Ritter, 1998).

van Paradijs & McClintock (1994) found an empirical relation between the ratio of X-ray and optical luminosities of Galactic X-ray binaries and their orbital periods, suggestive that the optical emission is dominated by reprocessed X-rays in the disk; this relation holds over a 10 magnitude range in optical luminosity, and appears to be independent of inclination. Their chosen X-ray band was 2–10 keV. For an irradiated accretion disk with radius , X-ray luminosity , optical luminosity , and temperature , /, while the surface brightness of the disk, , for typical XBs (van Paradijs & McClintock, 1994). Since , ; also , where is the orbital period.

van Paradijs & McClintock (1994) defined = , choosing = 2.5 erg s as a normalizing constant, and found

(1)

However, van Paradijs & McClintock (1994) sampled a mixture of neutron star and black hole binaries, in various spectral states. A cleaner sample was obtained by A. Moss et al. (2015, in prep), who used only black hole transients at the peaks of their outburst, and found

(2)

We note that these two relations only differ significantly in normalization, caused by black hole X-ray binaries having larger disks than neutron star binaries with the same period. We have period estimates for 14 M31 transients (T1–T12, ULX2, and T13) observed by Chandra and HST (Barnard et al., 2012, 2013b, 2014b). These period estimates appear to be slightly shorter over all than for Galactic transients, ranging from 1 hr to 140 hr, and mostly 30 hr (Barnard et al., 2012, 2013b, 2014b).

2 Observations and data reduction

We observed the region containing T14 in 101 Chandra observations (60 ACIS, 41 HRC). We observed T14 in outburst for 5.2 ks with the HST/ACS on 2011 July 21 using the F435W filter and the WFC mode (or “aperture”) (H1, jbm105010, PI M. Garcia); the 4.8 ks observation in quiescence occurred on 2014 June 26 (H2, jc6b02010, PI R. Barnard), using the WFC1-CTE aperture. The WFC1-CTE aperture improves the charge transfer efficiency by moving the target to the corner of a detector, allowing point sources to be more circular, but does not effect sensitivity; hence the level of background observed in H2 is unaffected by this change. We also analyzed a 2001 June 29 60 ks XMM-Newton observation containing a previous outburst that had sufficient counts for spectral fitting (0109270101, PI K. Mason).

All optical analysis was performed with pc-iraf Revision 2.14.1, except where noted. The Chandra and XMM-Newton observations were analyzed with ciao version 4.6.3 and SAS version 13.0 respectively; X-ray spectra from both telescopes were treated with xspec version 12.8.2b.

2.1 Hst analysis

Each HST observation included four flat-fielded (FLT) images, and one drizzled (DRZ) image. The flat-fielded images are corrected for instrumental effects, but not background subtracted; the total number of counts in each pixel is given. The native ACS resolution is comparable to the FWHM of the PSF (Fruchter & et al., 2009). The drizzled image combines the flat-fielded images, removes any cosmic rays, and subtracts the sky background; it is normalized to give the number of counts per second per pixel. We used the DRZ images from H1 and H2 to create a difference image; however, we used the H2 FLT images for our aperture photometry because the DRZ images sometimes contain pixels with slightly negative values, and this can cause problems when estimating the number of photons in a region.

Creating a difference image

We reprojected the H2 DRZ image into the coordinates of the H1 DRZ image, to produce an accurate difference image. To do this, we first registered the H1 and H2 images to the LGS Field 5 image with ccmap, using unsaturated stars that were close to the target. Then, we used the iraf task wregister to make the pixel orientation of the H2 image match that of the H1 image. We registered the H2 image to the H1 image before mapping to reduce the noise during image subtraction. The difference image was produced by subtracting H2 from H1 using the ftools task farith.

Measuring the optical counterpart

For H1 and H2 we found the number of photons for each FLT image within various extraction regions, yielding photons in total over seconds. We subtracted the H2 total from the H1 total to get source photons. We converted this to Vega magnitude via

(3)

having obtained the zero point ( = 25.77) from the ACS Zero Point calculator3; we see from Sirianni et al. (2005, Equation 12 and Table 18) that the conversion from F435W counts to B magnitude is within 3 of our ZP for B-V = 0.09 (assuming a typical disk spectrum Liu et al., 2001). We also estimated the 4 upper threshold for source detection from the total photon count from H2 ():

(4)

We can convert from magnitude to via

(5)

where is the line of sight absorption; this accounts for the difference in B and V magnitudes of a typical accretion disc, a relationship between B band extinction and measured line-of-sight absorption towards the object, and the distance to M31 (see Barnard et al., 2012, and references within).

2.2 XMM-Newton analysis

The XMM-Newton observation suffered substantial flares in the particle background due to soft Solar protons. We selected good time intervals by making a 10–12 keV pn lightcurve from the whole image with 100 s binning, using standard filters. We extracted source source and background spectra from the pn, MOS1 and MOS2 data: source spectra from a circular region that was optimized by the software (17 radius), and background spectra from a nearby circular region on the same CCD with no point source (35 radius). We grouped the source spectra to give a minimum of 20 counts per bin, created the corresponding response matrixes and ancillary response files, then fitted the spectra with xspec. The pn, MOS1, and MOS2 spectra were fitted simultaneously with constants of normalization to account for differences in detector responses.

We obtained uncertainties in the best fit parameters by simulating 1000 spectra with the multifake command, with deviations in simulated spectra being drawn from the properties of the observed spectrum. The best fit parameters for these spectra were each ranked in ascending order, with 1 uncertainties derived from the 160 and 840 data points.

Figure 1: Left: Detail of the 2011 July 21 HST/ACS WFC (H1) image of T14 during outburst. Middle: 2014 June (H2) image of T14 in quiescence. Right: Difference image, where white points were brighter in H1, and dark points were brighter in H2. North is up, East is left. The 3 uncertainty in X-ray source position (0.9 RA, 1.2 Dec) is indicated by an ellipse. We highlight the counterpart with two lines.

2.3 Chandra Analysis

Locating the X-ray source

We used 27 X-ray bright globular clusters (GCs) to register a combined 350 ks ACIS image (supplied by Z. Li) to the B band Field 5 image of M31 provided by the Local Galaxy group Survey (LGS) (Massey et al., 2006). We used pc-iraf v2.14.1 to perform the registration, following the same procedure as described in Barnard et al. (2012). The X-ray and LGS positions of the 27 X-ray bright GCs were determined using imcentroid; the equivalent FK5 coordinates were calculated for the X-ray and optical position of each GC using xy2sky v2.0, distributed with ftools. The X-ray positions of each GC were altered to match the LGS positions, allowing the registration of the merged Chandra image to Field 5 using the iraf task ccmap. This registration yielded 1 position uncertainties of 0.11 in R.A., and 0.09 in Dec (Barnard et al., 2012).

The final uncertainties in the X-ray position of T14 combine the position uncertainties in the X-ray image, and the uncertainties in registering the merged Chandra image to the M31 Field 5 LGS image.

Spectral fitting

Even the best Chandra ACIS spectrum for T14 yielded few counts. We modeled the spectrum in XSPEC in two ways: i) using a small number of bins with 20 counts per bin and statistics; and ii) using a larger number of bins with 5 counts per bin and Cash statistics. We estimated the uncertainties for each spectral fit using the same method as for our analysis of the XMM-Newton spectrum.

Estimating luminosities

For each of our Chandra ACIS observations we extracted source and background 0.3–7.0 keV spectra from circular regions with 10 radii. We then created a response matrix using mkacisrmf, and obtained an ancillary response file from mkarf. Spectral analysis was performed using xspec, giving unabsorbed 0.3–10 keV luminosities for each observation, allowing us to create a long-term luminosity lightcurve.

Most of the Chandra observations of T14 yielded too few photons for spectral fitting. However, we are able to estimate the 0.3–10 keV flux (and therefore luminosity) by assuming a particular emission model. If this model is a good approximation, then the luminosities of closely-spaced ACIS and HRC observations should agree; however, if the model is inappropriate, then the ACIS and HRC luminosities should be systematically offset, due to differences in instrumental response.

For each faint ACIS spectrum we used XSPEC to estimate the unabsorbed 0.3–10 keV flux equivalent to 1 count s, assuming the best fit emission model for the XMM-Newton pn spectrum of T14. Multiplying this number by the background-subtracted intensity yields a flux that is corrected for instrumental effects, and we obtain the luminosity by assuming a distance of 780 kpc (Stanek & Garnavich, 1998). It was important to do this for every observation because the roll angle was not constrained, meaning that the source appeared in different parts of the detectors, at various off-axis angles.

For HRC observations, we included only PI channels 48–293, thereby reducing the instrumental background. We used the WebPIMMS tool to find the unabsorbed luminosity equivalent to 1 count s, assuming the same emission model as for the ACIS observations. We created a 1 keV exposure map for each observation, and compared the exposure within the source region with that of an identical on-axis region, in order to estimate the exposure correction. We multiplied the background subtracted, corrected source intensity by the correction factor to get the 0.3–10 keV luminosity.

3 Results

3.1 Locating and measuring the optical counterpart

The uncertainty in X-ray position for T14 is 0.3 in R.A. and 0.4 in Dec (Barnard et al., 2014a). Registering H1 to the LGS M31 Field 5 image provided by Massey et al. (2006) yielded r.m.s. offsets of 0.04 in R.A. and 0.02 in Dec. The uncertainties arising from HST are negligible in comparison with the X-ray uncertainties. In Figure 1 we present details of the HST/ACS WFC F435W images of T14 from H1 (left), and H2 (middle), along with the difference image (right). For each panel, an ellipse represents the 3 uncertainty in X-ray position with respect to the LGS image (0.9 in R.A., and 1.2 in Dec.). For the difference image, white stars were brighter in H1, while dark stars were brighter in H2. We find evidence for a faint optical counterpart at 00:42:05.818 +41:13:30.00, with respect to the LGS Field 5 B band image. This is 8 offset from the centres of the Chandra images.

In Barnard et al. (2014b) we used a circle with 3 pixel radius (3FWHM) to estimate the flux for T13; however, this was impossible for T14 because this region was severely contaminated by cosmic rays in the H2 image, and the H2 intensity (7.60.08 count s) was substantially higher than the H1 intensity (5.5 count0.04 s). Extracting counts from a 3 pixel region yielded very similar result to extraction from a 22 pixel region: background-subtracted intensities of 0.110.02 and 0.100.02 count s respectively. All uncertainties in this work are quoted at the 1 level.

For H1, the 33 pixel region yielded 6688 photons over 5240 seconds, while the 22 region yielded 3406 photons; for H2 the 33 region produced 4263 photons over 4790 seconds, while the 2 region gave 2658 photons. These results allow us to estimate the B magnitude of T14 to be 28.210.16 in H1 (using Equation 3) , with a 4 detection limit of 28.6 magnitudes measured for H2 from the 3 pixel region (Equation 4).

The faintest counterpart that we detected previously had an apparent B magnitude of 24.870.09, but we measured 4 upper limits of B 28.7 for two other transients; the detection limit is strongly location-dependent, ranging from B 26 in the bulge to B 29 further out (Barnard et al., 2012, 2013b). We note that the H1 DRZ file, which is background-subtracted, yields an intensity of 0.16 count s for the 33 region, and 0.10 count s for the 22 region, which are consistent with our intensities obtained by subtracting H2 from H1.

3.2 Characterising the X-ray spectrum

Figure 2: Unfolded XMM-Newton pn, MOS1 and MOS2 spectra for T14 from the 2001 June 29 observation of T14, fitted with the best fit absorbed power law model. The y axis shows the model multiplied by channel energy. For this model, = 2.60.3 atom cm and = 1.840.12, /dof = 42/54; the MOS1 and MOS2 spectra were normalized by factors of 1.020.03 and 1.150.03 respectively in order to account for differences in detector response.

XMM-Newton

The XMM-Newton pn spectrum of T14 contained 550 net source counts, with an intensity of 0.02090.0009 count s, while the MOS1 and MOS2 spectra contained 242 and 323 counts respectively; this is sufficient for simple emission models. For the simultaneous spectral fits, and represent the normalizations for MOS1 and MOS2 respectively. X-ray binaries exhibit characteristic emission spectra that depend on the accretor and spectral state. The hard state is common to all X-ray binaries, whether the accretor is a neutron star or black hole (van der Klis, 1994); its emission is dominated by inverse Comptonization of cool photons on hot electrons, and may be represented by a power law with photon index () = 1.4–2.1 (see e.g. van der Klis, 1994; Remillard & McClintock, 2006). This hard state is observed at luminosities below 10% of the Eddington limit (Gladstone et al., 2007; Tang et al., 2011). Black hole transients often exhibit a thermally dominated state during outburst, characterized by a multi-temperature disk blackbody with inner disk temperature () 1 keV (Remillard & McClintock, 2006). The other states of NS and BH XBs are more complex, with multiple emission components, so we do not attempt to fit them here.

Fitting an absorbed power law model yielded a best fit line of sight absorption () of 2.60.3 atom cm and = 1.840.12, = 1.030.03, = 1.150.03; the 0.3–10 keV unabsorbed luminosity was 1.890.12 erg s, and /dof = 42/54.

The best fit disk blackbody model yielded = 0.090.03 atom cm and = 1.4600.13 keV, = 1.000.03, = 1.150.04; the 0.3–10 keV unabsorbed luminosity was 1.250.08 erg s and /dof = 56/54.

The unabsorbed luminosities obtained from these emission models are inconsistent at the 3 level; this is due to the lower column density from the disk blackbody model, caused by the natural downward curvature of the model at low energies. The fit may be improved by using a power law model rather than a disk blackbody model: = 7 for 3 free parameters, and the probability that this improvement is genuine is 93%, i.e. not 3. When we consider that the luminosity is consistent with the hard state of any XB (NS or BH accretor), then we find the power law emission model to be most likely. We present the unfolded pn spectrum for T14 assuming the best fit power law emission model in Fig. 2; the y-axis shows the spectrum multiplied by channel energy in order to show the distribution of flux.

Chandra

The best Chandra ACIS observation of T14 yielded 130 counts in the 0.3–7.0 keV range, with no photons detected in the background region over the 4 ks exposure time. This produced a 6 bin spectrum for fitting, and a 25 bin spectrum for fitting with Cash statistics.

The best fit absorbed power law model yielded = 86 atom cm, = 1.80.5, and a 0.3–10 keV luminosity of 93 erg s. The best Cash statistic fit yielded = 43 atom cm, = 1.50.3, and 0.3–10 keV luminosity 7.11.1 erg s. These fits are consistent with those obtained from the XMM-Newton spectrum.

Fitting an absorbed disk blackbody model with statistics resulted in = 33 atom cm, k = 2.10.7, and = 5.20.8 erg s. Cash statistics yielded = 22 atom cm, and kT = 2.00.7, with a 0.3–10 keV luminosity of 3.10.6 erg s.

3.3 The X-ray lightcurve

Figure 3: Unabsorbed 0.3–10 keV lightcurve for T14, from ACIS (filled circles), HRC (hollow circles) and XMM-Newton (triangle) observations, assuming an absorbed power law with = 2.6 atom cm and = 1.84. We also show indicate times of the HST observations with downward arrows.

We obtained a long-term 0.3–10 keV unabsorbed luminosity lightcurve for T14 from the ACIS and HRC observations by assuming an absorbed power law emission model with = 2.6 atom cm and = 1.84. In Fig. 3 we present luminosities from the ACIS (filled circles) and HRC (hollow circles) observations; we indicate the times of the HST observations with downward arrows, and also include the XMM-Newton observation (triangle).

We see that T14 exhibited several outbursts; they do not appear to follow the traditional exponential or linear decay seen in Galactic transients (King & Ritter, 1998); we discuss a possible reason for this below. The luminosities obtained from XMM-Newton, ACIS and HRC are all consistent for the first outburst despite the very different instrumental responses, and the ACIS and HRC luminosities appear to be in good agreement for the whole lightcurve, showing that the emission model is probably a good approximation to the true spectrum.

However, we caution that we did not observe any period where the luminosity exceeded 210 erg s (10% Eddington for a 1.4 NS) with more than one detector. Hence, we cannot determine whether the spectrum evolved as the luminosity increased.

3.4 Period estimation

Figure 4: Close-up of the outburst examined by Chandra and HST. The axes and symbols are the same as for Fig. 3.

Assuming an apparent B magnitude of 28.21 for T14 during H1 and line-of-sight absorption equivalent to 2.6 H atom cm, Equation 5 yields an absolute V magnitude of +1.9 for T14 in outburst. The highest 2–10 keV luminosity observed from T14 during the outburst was 2.70.2 erg s for our assumed emission model. We estimated the orbital period using Equations 1 and 2.

We included the uncertainties in , as well as the uncertainties in the relations themselves by simulating 1000 instances using a Park-Miller random number generator to obtain numbers from 0 to 1, and the Box-Muller technique to convert these numbers into a normal distribution: if we obtain two random numbers and between 0 and 1, then and are two independent random numbers with a normal distribution. For each parameter, we added a normally distributed random number multiplied by the 1 uncertainty to the best fit value in order to obtain the value for that instance.

For each empirical relation between X-ray to optical flux ratio and period (Equation 1 and Equation 2), we obtained 1000 estimates of the period and ranked these estimates in ascending order; we estimated the mean for each period as ( + )/2 and the 1 uncertainty as ( )/2, where and are the 160 and 840 ranked periods. The estimated period from Equation 1 is 3.0 hr, while Equation 2 yields a period of 1.1 hr; these uncertainties include the uncertainties in the relations described in Equations 1 and 2 as well as uncertainties in X-ray and optical fluxes.

4 Summary and conclusions

We conducted a 13 year programme of Chandra observations of the central region of M31, monitoring for outbursts of X-ray transients. Transients that were particularly bright or otherwise interesting were followed up with HST/ACS, using the F435W filter that approximates the B band to search for optical counterparts. CXOM31 004205.77+411330.43 (T14) is one such transient; the outburst was observed by HST in 2011 July, but the follow-up HST observation occurred only recently, in 2014 June. Difference imaging yielded a counterpart with B magnitude 28.210.16.

Modeling an XMM-Newton spectrum from a previous outburst provided a good fit from an absorbed power law model with = 2.60.3 atom cm and = 1.840.12, with /dof = 42/54. Fitting the best Chandra ACIS spectrum yielded results consistent with the XMM-Newton fits. Furthermore, using the XMM-Newton mode for ACIS and HRC observations yielded consistent results, suggesting that this is a good description of the spectrum, as instrumental differences would result in substantial systematic offsets in luminosity if the spectrum was very different. Using the best fit column density, and assuming a typically flat accretion disk spectrum, we estimated the absolute V band magnitude to be 1.9.

The highest observed 2–10 keV luminosity during outburst was 2.920.06 erg s with our assumed emission model. Using two empirical relations between the ratio of X-ray to optical flux and the orbital period (Equations 1 and 2), we estimate the orbital period of T14 to be 3.0 hr and 1.1 hr respectively.

We note that Equation 1 was derived from a mixture of NS and BH XBs in several different spectral states, while Equation 2 was obtained from a more selective sample, including only BH XBs in the thermal dominant state. For several of our transients, the resulting periods varied by a factor 3; however, for others, including T14, the periods are consistent within uncertainties (Barnard et al., 2012).

We also note that relations between optical to X-ray flux ratio and orbital period best apply to the peak of the outburst, because the optical decay rate is systematically a factor 2 longer than the X-ray decay (Chen et al., 1997). If the peak was unobserved, then the X-ray to optical ratio would be higher, resulting in a smaller orbital period.

It is therefore likely that the orbital period for T14 is 4 hr for a BH accretor. This short period may explain the rather erratic behaviour during the decay, as shown in Fig. 4, because accretion may be modulated by the precession of an asymmetric disk. Such behaviour was first observed in cataclysmic variables (CVs) with low mass ratios (and short orbital periods).

Osaki (1989) proposed that the super-outbursts observed in CVs with low mass ratios (i.e. short periods) are enhanced by a tidal instability that occurs when the outer disk crosses the 3:1 resonance with the secondary; the additional tidal torque causes the disk to elongate and precess, and also greatly enhances the loss of angular momentum (and therefore the accretion rate). The disk precession is prograde in the rest frame, and the secondary repeats its motion with respect to the disk on the beat period between the orbital period and the precession period, a few percent longer than the orbital period. The secondary modulates the disk’s viscous dissipation on this period, giving rise to the maxima in the optical lightcurve known as superhumps. Some short period, persistently bright CVs exhibit permanent superhumps (Patterson, 1999; Retter & Naylor, 2000). We note that Haswell et al. (2001) found that X-ray binaries with periods 4 hr are likely to have asymmetric, precessing disks.

The X-ray binary associated with the M31 globular cluster B158 is observed at a high inclination, and exhibits periodic 1001750 s (2.8 hr) variation in the X-ray lightcurve in some observations (Trudolyubov et al., 2002) but not others (Barnard et al., 2006). The long-term unabsorbed 0.3–10 keV luminosity lightcurve of XB158 varied between 4 and 2010 erg s; we suggested that this modulation was due to changes in mass transfer during the disk precession cycle (Barnard et al., 2013c). In Barnard et al. (2006) we conducted three dimensional smooth particle hydrodynamical modeling of XB158, and predicted a disk precession period of 291 times the orbital period, or 813 hr. This motivated us to observe XB158 30 times over 30 days with the Swift XRT in order to search for modulations in the intensity over timescales of a few days. We observed approximately sinusoidal variation of the 0.3–10 keV unabsorbed luminosity over 4–20 erg s on a 5.650.05 day period (Barnard et al., 2015).

The outburst of T14 studied with Chandra and HST has a decay profile (Fig. 4) that is unlike those of Galactic transient XBs, which exhibit exponential decay when the whole disk is irradiated, and linear decay in case of partial irradiation; the decay can change from exponential to linear when the X-ray luminosity is no longer sufficient to irradiate the whole disk (King & Ritter, 1998). We propose that the X-ray luminosity may be modulated by variations in mass transfer from an asymmetrical, precessing disk.

Acknowledgments

This research has made use of data obtained from the Chandra satellite, and software provided by the Chandra X-Ray Center (CXC). We thank Z. Li for creating the merged Chandra image used to register the X-ray image. We also include analysis of public archival data from XMM-Newton, an ESA science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA member states and the US (NASA) R.B. was funded by the Chandra grant GO3-14096X, along with the HST grant GO-13111.05-A. Support for program #13111 was provided by NASA through a grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. M.R.G. and S.S.M are partially supported by NASA contract NAS8-03060.

Footnotes

  1. pagerange: Chandra, XMM-Newton and HST observations of a transient in M31 with a possible asymmetric, precessing diskAcknowledgments
  2. pubyear: 2015
  3. http://www.stsci.edu/hst/acs/analysis/zeropoints/zpt.py

References

  1. Barnard, R., Foulkes, S. B., Haswell, C. A., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 287
  2. Barnard, R., Galache, J. L., Garcia, M. R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 32
  3. Barnard, R., Garcia, M., Murray, S., & Primini, F. 2013a, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 5108, 1
  4. Barnard, R., Garcia, M., & Murray, S. S. 2013b, ApJ, 772, 126
  5. Barnard, R., Garcia, M. R., & Murray, S. S. 2013c, ApJ, 770, 148
  6. Barnard, R., Garcia, M. R., & Murrray, S. S. 2015, ApJ, 801, 65
  7. Barnard, R., Garcia, M. R., Primini, F., et al. 2014a, ApJ, 780, 83
  8. Barnard, R., Garcia, M. R., Primini, F., & Murray, S. S. 2014b, ApJ, 780, 169
  9. Chen, W., Shrader, C. R., & Livio, M. 1997, ApJ, 491, 312
  10. Fruchter, A. & et al. 2009, HST MultiDrizzle Handbook
  11. Gladstone, J., Done, C., & Gierliński, M. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 13
  12. Haswell, C. A., King, A. R., Murray, J. R., & Charles, P. A. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 475
  13. King, A. R. & Ritter, H. 1998, MNRAS, 293, L42
  14. Lasota, J.-P. 2001, NAR, 45, 449
  15. Liu, Q. Z., van Paradijs, J., & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 2001, A&A, 368, 1021
  16. Massey, P., Olsen, K. A. G., Hodge, P. W., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2478
  17. Osaki, Y. 1989, PASJ, 41, 1005
  18. Patterson, J. 1999, in Disk Instabilities in Close Binary Systems, ed. S. Mineshige & J. C. Wheeler, 61
  19. Remillard, R. A. & McClintock, J. E. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 49
  20. Retter, A. & Naylor, T. 2000, MNRAS, 319, 510
  21. Sirianni, M., Jee, M. J., Benítez, N., et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 1049
  22. Stanek, K. Z. & Garnavich, P. M. 1998, ApJL, 503, L131
  23. Tang, J., Yu, W.-F., & Yan, Z. 2011, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 11, 434
  24. Trudolyubov, S. P., Borozdin, K. N., Priedhorsky, W. C., et al. 2002, ApJL, 581, L27
  25. van der Klis, M. 1994, ApJS, 92, 511
  26. van Paradijs, J. & McClintock, J. E. 1994, A&A, 290, 133
  27. Williams, B. F., Hogan, C. J., Barris, B., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 2608
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
204621
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description