Broadband microwave spectroscopy of semiconductor nanowire-based Cooper-pair transistors

Broadband microwave spectroscopy of semiconductor nanowire-based Cooper-pair transistors

Alex Proutski    Dominique Laroche    Bas van ’t Hooft QuTech and Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands    Peter Krogstrup Microsoft Quantum Materials Lab Copenhagen, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Center for Quantum Devices, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark    Jesper Nygård Center for Quantum Devices, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark    Leo P. Kouwenhoven Microsoft Quantum Lab Delft, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands QuTech and Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands    Attila Geresdi a.geresdi@tudelft.nl QuTech and Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
September 10, 2019
Abstract

The Cooper-pair transistor (CPT), a small superconducting island enclosed between two Josephson weak links, is the atomic building block of various superconducting quantum circuits. Utilizing gate-tunable semiconductor channels as weak links, the energy scale associated with the Josephson tunneling can be changed with respect to the charging energy of the island, tuning the extent of its charge fluctuations. Here we directly demonstrate this control by mapping the energy level structure of a CPT made of an indium arsenide (InAs) nanowire (NW) with a superconducting aluminum (Al) shell. We extract the device parameters based on the exhaustive modeling of the quantum dynamics of the phase-biased nanowire CPT and directly measure the even-odd parity occupation ratio as a function of the device temperature, relevant for superconducting and prospective topological qubits.

thanks: These authors contributed equally to this work.thanks: These authors contributed equally to this work.

The energy landscape of a Cooper-pair transistor (CPT), a mesoscopic superconducting island coupled to superconducting leads via two Josephson junctions, is determined by the interplay of the electrostatic addition energy of a single Cooper pair, Averin_1991 ; Grabert_1991 and the coherent tunneling of Cooper pairs, characterized by the Josephson energy, Josephon_1962 ; Ambegaokar1963 .

The electronic transport through CPTs have mostly been studied for metallic superconducting islands enclosed between tunnel junctions by voltage bias spectroscopy PhysRevLett.59.109 ; PhysRevLett.65.377 ; Tuominen_1992 , switching current measurements Joyez1994 ; PhysRevB.50.627 ; Aumentado_2004 ; Woerkom2015 , microwave reflectometry Ferguson_2006 ; PhysRevB.78.024503 , and broadband microwave spectroscopy Billangeon_2007 ; PhysRevLett.98.216802 . Recent material developments Krogstrup2015 ; Gazibegovic2017 made it possible to investigate superconducting transport in semiconductor nanowire weak links, which lead to Andreev level quantum circuits Woerkom_2017_ABS ; PhysRevLett.121.047001 ; PhysRevX.9.011010 and gate-tunable superconducting quantum devices PhysRevLett.115.127001 ; PhysRevLett.115.127002 ; PhysRevLett.120.100502 ; 2018arXiv180201327C . In addition, hybrid superconductor-semiconductor island devices, which are the atomic building blocks of proposed topological quantum bits based on Majorana zero-energy modes PhysRevB.88.035121 ; Aasen_2016 ; PhysRevB.95.235305 ; Plugge2017 , have been fabricated and measured using normal metallic leads Albrecht_2016 ; Shen2018 , but thus far there is very limited experimental work on hybrid CPTs with superconducting leads PhysRevB.98.174502 .

Such applications require the control of the Josephson coupling via the semiconductor weak link PhysRevLett.119.187704 . In addition, the charging energy of a NW CPT can deviate from the predictions of the ortodox theory Averin_1991 ; Grabert_1991 due to renormalization effects arising because of finite channel transmissions PhysRevLett.82.3685 . Therefore, understanding the quantum dynamics of CPTs with semiconductor weak links is crucial for these hybrid device architectures.

Here we directly measure the transitions between the energy levels of a NW CPT. The CPT is embedded in the circuit shown in Fig. 1a. The superconducting island is created from an indium arsenide (InAs) nanowire with an epitaxial layer of aluminium (Al) Krogstrup2015 between two Josephson junctions, formed by removing two sections of the Al shell with a wet chemical etch. We investigated two devices, both with nm long junctions and island lengths of nm and m for device 1 and device 2 (enclosed in the red box in Fig. 1a), respectively. The junctions were tuned via their respective local electrostatic gates, and . The gate charge, , was set by the gate voltage (see right panel in Fig. 1a). The nanowire CPT is embedded in a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) with an Al/AlO/Al tunnel junction (in the yellow box in Fig. 1a) which exhibits a much higher Josephson energy than the CPT. This asymmetry ensures that the applied phase drops mostly over the CPT. Here, is the applied flux and is the superconducting flux quantum.

Figure 1: (a) Left: Scanning electron micrograph of the nanowire CPT (in red box) and an Al/AlO/Al tunnel junction (yellow box) forming the hybrid SQUID loop. Middle: false colored micrograph of the nanowire CPT (device 2). Right: three dimensional sketch of the CPT on the three electrostatic gates. (b) Equivalent circuit schematics with the hybrid SQUID on the left and a single Al/AlO/Al tunnel junction used as a spectrometer (green box) on the right side. The circuit elements within the black dashed box are on-chip and cooled to mK. (c) trace of the spectrometer with the CPT arm in full depletion (device 1). The red solid line shows the fit to the circuit model of a single resonance centred at eV driven by the photons with an energy of emitted by the spectrometer junction (d). The calculated energy bands (e) and transition energies (f) of a CPT with as a function of gate charge, and total phase bias, .

We utilized a capacitively coupled Al/AlO/Al superconducting tunnel junction as a broadband on-chip microwave spectrometer (green box in Fig. 1b) Billangeon_2007 ; Bretheau_2013_Andreev ; Woerkom_2017_ABS , where inelastic Cooper-pair tunneling gives rise to a DC current contribution in a dissipative environment Holst_1994 :

(1)

Here, is the critical current of the spectrometer tunnel junction and is the impedance of the environment at the frequency , determined by the spectrometer DC voltage bias, (Fig. 1d). This DC to microwave conversion allowed us to directly measure the excitation energies of the hybrid SQUID, where exhibits a local maximum Kos_2013 . To reduce microwave leakage, we applied the bias voltages to the hybrid SQUID and to the spectrometer junctions via on-chip resistors, yielding and . The chip (in black dashed box in Fig. 1b) was thermally anchored to the mixing chamber of the dilution refrigerator with a base temperature of mK. Full details of the fabrication process and device geometry are given in the supplementary information.

Figure 2: (a) Equivalent schematics of the hybrid SQUID used to build the circuit Hamiltonian. Observed transitions for device 1 as a function of the gate charge, (b) and applied phase bias, (c). The transitions are identified at the local minima of (yellow dots). The best fit is shown as solid lines, yielding eV, eV, eV, eV and eV, see text. (d) The corresponding energy bands of the device as a function of at . The two-component probability distributions of the ground state (e), first excited state (f) and second excited state (g) at and , denoted by circles of the corresponding color in panel (d), see text. See Fig. 3 upper row for gate voltage values.

We begin by analyzing the circuit while keeping both nanowire junctions in full depletion by applying large negative gate voltages and . The curve of the spectrometer of device 1 is shown in Fig. 1c. A clear peak is observed with an amplitude of nA centered at eV. We attribute this peak to the plasma resonance of the tunnel junction in the SQUID at . Here eV is the Josephson energy Ambegaokar1963 , with eV being the superconducting gap and the normal state resistance of the junction. This value yields eV and a shunt capacitance fF. Fitting the resonant peak using Eq. (1), we find a quality factor and a characteristic impedance , which together ensure the validity of Eq. (1) describing a direct correspondence between the measured and . We note that we found very similar values for device 2 as well (see supplementary information for a detailed analysis and a list of parameters).

Figure 3: Upper row: The measured excitations spectrum of device 1 as a function of and with V, V and mV, same as in Fig. 2. Panel (b) shows the full map of the second excitation whereas linecut data is shown at the positions denoted by the orange and red lines respectively in (a) and (c). Bottom row: measured data on the same device with V, V and mV. Note the weak dependence on due to the more open semiconductor channels. The best fits of the first two excitation energies are overlain in panels (a), (c) and (d), (e). All data was taken on device 1, the parameters of the best fit are listed on the right for each setting.

Next, we investigate the spectrometer response to the applied gate voltage and phase (Fig. 2b and c) when the Josephson junctions are opened by setting positive gate voltages and . The excitations of the CPT are superimposed on that of the plasma resonance, so we display to reach a better visibility of the transitions (see the supplementary information for a comparison). Note that we show the excitation energy on the vertical axis for all spectra. This measurement yields clear oscillations as a function of both and , consistent with the expected periodic behavior of the CPT energy levels Joyez1994 . We note that the finite load resistance of the spectrometer prevented us from measuring the transitions below eV.

We model our device with the schematics depicted in Fig. 2a and build the Hamiltonian of the circuit based on conventional quantization procedures PhysRevA.69.062320 ; doi:10.1002/cta.2359 . We use the conjugate charge and phase operators which pairwise obey and note that :

(2)

Here the charging of the circuit is described by the effective parameters , and set by the capacitance values , , , and with a functional form provided in the supplementary information. The Cooper-pair tunneling is characterized by the Josephson energies of the three junctions, , and , respectively. We note that we set eV for the analysis below.

To calculate the excitation spectrum, we solve the eigenvalue problem to find , where , and compute the transition energies , with being the ground state energy of the system. This model allows us to fit the excitation spectra simultaneously as a function of and based on the first two transitions (red and purple solid lines for and , respectively) against the measured data (yellow circles in Fig. 2). For illustration, we also display (orange line) in Fig. 2b using the same fit parameters, however, this transition was not observed in the experiment.

To understand the nature of the excited levels, we calculate the energy bands of the hybrid SQUID using the fitted parameters (Fig. 2d) and evaluate the probability distribution , where and form the charge computational basis. However, it is more instructive to use the charge numbers and . Intuitively, and represent the excess number of Cooper pairs on the island and in the loop, respectively. Indeed, the ground state wavefunction is centered around (Fig. 2e). Conversely, the probability distribution of the first excited state (Fig. 2f) exhibits a bimodal distribution in , consistently with the first plasma mode excitation but no excess charge on the CPT (purple circle in Fig. 2d). This is in contrast with the wavefunction of the next energy level (Fig. 2g and red circle in Fig. 2d), which is centered around . This analysis demonstrates the coupling between the plasma and localized charge degrees of freedom Wallraff_2004 .

Next, we investigate the impact of and on the CPT spectrum. In Fig. 3, we show the measured spectra for two distinct gate settings. Remarkably, almost a full suppression of the charge dispersion is achieved by an V increase in and , showcasing the feasibility of topological quantum bit designs relying on the modulation of the charge dispersion in superconductor-semiconductor hybrid devices Aasen_2016 . Furthermore, we observe a strong renormalization of the characteristic charging energies in the open regime PhysRevLett.82.3685 ; PhysRevLett.122.016801 , which does not exist for the case of fully metallic CPTs with tunnel junctions, where the charging energy is fully determined by the device geometry. In addition, we find an increase in the Josephson energies , further contributing to the suppression of the charge dispersion of the CPT in the limit of PhysRevA.76.042319 .

Thus far, we only considered the even charge occupation of the island, where all electrons are part of the Cooper-pair condensate, and a single quasiparticle occupation is exponentially suppressed in , where is the superconducting gap Averin1992 . However, a residual odd population is typically observed in the experiments, attributed to a non-thermal quasiparticle population in the superconducting circuit. In our experiment, we also find an additional spectral line, shifted by (see Figs 2b and 3a), substantiating a finite odd number population of the island. We investigate this effect as a function of the temperature, and find that above a typical temperature of mK, the measured signal is fully periodic (Fig. 4b), in contrast to the periodic data taken at mK (Fig. 4a).

To quantify the probability of the even and odd occupations, we extract the gate-charge dependent component of the measured spectra to evaluate and , see the inset in Fig. 4c. We now make the assumption that the microwave photon frequency is much higher than the parity switching rate of the CPT. We evaluate the current response at eV (see Figs. 4a and b) corresponding to GHz, well exceeding parity switching rates measured earlier on similar devices Albrecht_2017 ; PhysRevB.98.174502 . In this limit, the time-averaged spectrometer response is the linear combination of the signals corresponding to the two parity states and , respectively. From this linear proportionality, follows.

We plot the extracted in Fig. 4c. We find that above a crossover temperature mK, approaches , in agreement with the commonly observed breakdown of the parity effect at as a result of the vanishing even-odd free energy difference Lafarge_1993 ; Woerkom2015 ; Higginbotham2015 :

(3)

Here, at a temperature of with the island volume being . We use the density of states at the Fermi level in the normal state for aluminium Ferguson_2006 . Then the even charge parity occupation is given by .

While this analysis describes the breakdown of the even-odd effect (see blue dashed line as the best fit in Fig. 4c), it fails to account for the observed saturation in the low temperature limit, at mK. This saturation can be be phenomenologically understood based on a spurious overheating of the island. We assume that the electron temperature , where the chip (phonon) temperature is , and the electron saturation temperature is due to overheating and weak electron-phonon coupling at low temperatures Giazotto2006 .

The resulting best fit is shown as a solid red line in Fig. 4c. We find a metallic volume of , consistent with the micrograph shown in Fig. 1a. The fit yields a superconducting gap eV, slightly lower than the that of bulk aluminum, which is expected due to the presence of induced superconductivity in the semiconductor. The fitted saturation temperature mK and limiting demonstrates the abundance of non-equilibrium quasiparticles, in agreement with recent experimental findings PhysRevLett.121.157701 ; mannila2018parity on metallic devices. The same analysis was also performed on device 1 yielding similar results, see the supplementary information. Our results substantiate the importance of controlling the quasiparticle population for hybrid semiconductor-superconductor CPTs in prospective topological quantum bits to decrease their rate of decoherence PhysRevB.85.174533 .

Figure 4: The measured excitation spectra of device 2 at V, V as a function of corresponding to mV at and at a temperature of mK (a) and mK (b). (c) The extracted even charge parity state occupation as a function of the temperature. The inset shows the modulation of the spectrometer current at eV at these two temperatures, which defines and , see text. The fit lines in (c) are based on Eq. (3), without (blue dashed line) and including overheating (solid red line).

In conclusion, we performed broadband microwave spectroscopy on the gate charge and phase-dependent energy dispersion of InAs/Al hybrid CPTs, utilizing an on-chip nanofabricated circuit with a superconducting tunnel junction as a frequency-tunable microwave source. We understand the observed spectra based on the Hamiltonian of the circuit and find the characteristic charging and Josephson tunneling energy scales, both exhibiting strong modulation with the electrostatic gates coupled to the semiconductor channels. This broad tunability demonstrates the feasibility of prospective topological qubits relying on a controlled suppression of the charge modulation. Finally, we directly measure the time-averaged even and odd charge parity occupation of the CPT island, yielding a residual odd parity occupation probability, which can be a limiting factor for topological quantum bit architectures that rely on charge parity manipulation and readout.

The analyzed raw datasets and data processing scripts for this publication are available at the 4TU.ResearchData repository rawdata .

The authors gratefully acknowledge O. Benningshof and R. Schouten for technical assistance as well as D. J. van Woerkom, D. B. Bouman and B. Nijholt for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) as part of the Frontiers of Nanoscience program, Microsoft Corporation Station Q, the Danish National Research Foundation and a Synergy Grant of the European Research Council. P. K. acknowledge funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the grant agreement No. 716655 (HEMs-DAM).

References

  • (1) Averin, D. V. & Likharev, K. K. Single electronics: a correlated transfer of single electrons and Cooper pairs in systems of small tunnel junctions. In Alltshuler, B. V., Lee, P. A. & Webb, R. A. (eds.) Mesoscopic phenomena in solids, 173 (Elsevier BV, 1991).
  • (2) Grabert, H. & Devoret, M. H. (eds.). Single charge tunneling (Plenum, New York, 1991).
  • (3) Josephson, B. D. Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling. Phys. Lett. 1, 251–253 (1962).
  • (4) Ambegaokar, V. & Baratoff, A. Tunneling between superconductors. Physical Review Letters 10, 486 (1963).
  • (5) Fulton, T. A. & Dolan, G. J. Observation of single-electron charging effects in small tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 109–112 (1987).
  • (6) Geerligs, L. J., Anderegg, V. F., Romijn, J. & Mooij, J. E. Single Cooper-pair tunneling in small-capacitance junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 377–380 (1990).
  • (7) Tuominen, M., Hergenrother, J., Tighe, T. & Tinkham, M. Experimental evidence for parity-based 2e periodicity in a superconducting single-electron tunneling transistor. Physical Review Letters 69, 1997 (1992).
  • (8) Joyez, P., Lafarge, P., Filipe, A., Esteve, D. & Devoret, M. Observation of parity-induced suppression of Josephson tunneling in the superconducting single electron transistor. Physical Review Letters 72, 2458 (1994).
  • (9) Eiles, T. M. & Martinis, J. M. Combined josephson and charging behavior of the supercurrent in the superconducting single-electron transistor. Phys. Rev. B 50, 627–630 (1994).
  • (10) Aumentado, J., Keller, M. W., Martinis, J. M. & Devoret, M. H. Nonequilibrium quasiparticles and periodicity in single-Cooper-pair transistors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 066802 (2004).
  • (11) van Woerkom, D. J., Geresdi, A. & Kouwenhoven, L. P. One minute parity lifetime of a NbTiN Cooper-pair transistor. Nature Physics 11, 547–550 (2015).
  • (12) Ferguson, A. J., Court, N. A., Hudson, F. E. & Clark, R. G. Microsecond resolution of quasiparticle tunneling in the single-Cooper-pair transistor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 106603 (2006).
  • (13) Shaw, M. D., Lutchyn, R. M., Delsing, P. & Echternach, P. M. Kinetics of nonequilibrium quasiparticle tunneling in superconducting charge qubits. Phys. Rev. B 78, 024503 (2008).
  • (14) Billangeon, P.-M., Pierre, F., Bouchiat, H. & Deblock, R. Very high frequency spectroscopy and tuning of a single-Cooper-pair transistor with an on-chip generator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 126802 (2007).
  • (15) Billangeon, P.-M., Pierre, F., Bouchiat, H. & Deblock, R. ac josephson effect and resonant cooper pair tunneling emission of a single cooper pair transistor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 216802 (2007).
  • (16) Krogstrup, P. et al. Epitaxy of semiconductor–superconductor nanowires. Nature Materials 14, 400–406 (2015).
  • (17) Gazibegovic, S. et al. Epitaxy of advanced nanowire quantum devices. Nature 548, 434–438 (2017).
  • (18) van Woerkom, D. J. et al. Microwave spectroscopy of spinful Andreev bound states in ballistic semiconductor Josephson junctions. Nature Physics 13, 876–881 (2017).
  • (19) Hays, M. et al. Direct microwave measurement of Andreev-bound-state dynamics in a semiconductor-nanowire Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 047001 (2018).
  • (20) Tosi, L. et al. Spin-orbit splitting of andreev states revealed by microwave spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X 9, 011010 (2019).
  • (21) Larsen, T. W. et al. Semiconductor-nanowire-based superconducting qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 127001 (2015).
  • (22) de Lange, G. et al. Realization of microwave quantum circuits using hybrid superconducting-semiconducting nanowire Josephson elements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 127002 (2015).
  • (23) Luthi, F. et al. Evolution of nanowire transmon qubits and their coherence in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 100502 (2018).
  • (24) Casparis, L. et al. Voltage-Controlled Superconducting Quantum Bus. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1802.01327 (2018). eprint 1802.01327.
  • (25) Hyart, T. et al. Flux-controlled quantum computation with Majorana fermions. Phys. Rev. B 88, 035121 (2013).
  • (26) Aasen, D. et al. Milestones toward Majorana-based quantum computing. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031016 (2016).
  • (27) Karzig, T. et al. Scalable designs for quasiparticle-poisoning-protected topological quantum computation with Majorana zero modes. Phys. Rev. B 95, 235305 (2017).
  • (28) Plugge, S., Rasmussen, A., Egger, R. & Flensberg, K. Majorana box qubits. New Journal of Physics 19, 012001 (2017).
  • (29) Albrecht, S. M. et al. Exponential protection of zero modes in Majorana islands. Nature 531, 206 (2016).
  • (30) Shen, J. et al. Parity transitions in the superconducting ground state of hybrid InSb-Al Coulomb islands. Nature Communications 9, 4801– (2018).
  • (31) van Veen, J. et al. Magnetic-field-dependent quasiparticle dynamics of nanowire single-Cooper-pair transistors. Phys. Rev. B 98, 174502 (2018).
  • (32) Zuo, K. et al. Supercurrent interference in few-mode nanowire Josephson junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 187704 (2017).
  • (33) Averin, D. V. Coulomb blockade in superconducting quantum point contacts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3685–3688 (1999).
  • (34) Bretheau, L., Girit, Ç., Pothier, H., Esteve, D. & Urbina, C. Exciting Andreev pairs in a superconducting atomic contact. Nature 499, 312 (2013).
  • (35) Holst, T., Esteve, D., Urbina, C. & Devoret, M. Effect of a transmission line resonator on a small capacitance tunnel junction. Physical Review Letters 73, 3455 (1994).
  • (36) Kos, F., Nigg, S. & Glazman, L. Frequency-dependent admittance of a short superconducting weak link. Physical Review B 87, 174521 (2013).
  • (37) Blais, A., Huang, R.-S., Wallraff, A., Girvin, S. M. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004).
  • (38) Vool, U. & Devoret, M. Introduction to quantum electromagnetic circuits. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 45, 897–934 (2017).
  • (39) Wallraff, A. et al. Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature 431, 162– (2004).
  • (40) Pikulin, D., Flensberg, K., Glazman, L. I., Houzet, M. & Lutchyn, R. M. Coulomb blockade of a nearly open Majorana island. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 016801 (2019).
  • (41) Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
  • (42) Averin, D. & Nazarov, Y. V. Single-electron charging of a superconducting island. Physical Review Letters 69, 1993 (1992).
  • (43) Albrecht, S. M. et al. Transport signatures of quasiparticle poisoning in a Majorana island. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 137701 (2017).
  • (44) Lafarge, P., Joyez, P., Esteve, D., Urbina, C. & Devoret, M. Measurement of the even-odd free-energy difference of an isolated superconductor. Physical Review Letters 70, 994 (1993).
  • (45) Higginbotham, A. P. et al. Parity lifetime of bound states in a proximitized semiconductor nanowire. Nature Physics 11, 1017 (2015).
  • (46) Giazotto, F., Heikkilä, T. T., Luukanen, A., Savin, A. M. & Pekola, J. P. Opportunities for mesoscopics in thermometry and refrigeration: Physics and applications. Reviews of Modern Physics 78, 217–274 (2006).
  • (47) Serniak, K. et al. Hot nonequilibrium quasiparticles in transmon qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 157701 (2018).
  • (48) Mannila, E., Maisi, V., Nguyen, H., Marcus, C. & Pekola, J. Parity effect does not mean a superconductor free of quasiparticles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.01733 (2018).
  • (49) Rainis, D. & Loss, D. Majorana qubit decoherence by quasiparticle poisoning. Phys. Rev. B 85, 174533 (2012).
  • (50) Proutski, A. et al. Broadband microwave spectroscopy of semiconductor nanowire-based Cooper-pair transistors. 4TU.ResearchData repository. eprint http://dx.doi.org/10.4121/uuid:5d54f11b-6774-4ae4-96cf-25e6a91927e2.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
363456
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description