Bound states and persistent currents in topological insulator rings
Abstract
We analyze theoretically the bound state spectrum of an Aharonov Bohm (AB) ring in a twodimensional topological insulator using the fourband model of HgTequantum wells as a concrete example. We calculate analytically the circular helical edge states and their spectrum as well as the bound states evolving out of the bulk spectrum as a function of the applied magnetic flux and dimension of the ring. We also analyze the spindependent persistent currents, which can be used to measure the spin of single electrons. We further take into account the Rashba spinorbit interaction which mixes the spin states and derive its effect on the ring spectrum. The flux tunability of the ring states allows for coherent mixing of the edge and the spin degrees of freedom of bound electrons which could be exploited for quantum information processing in topological insulator rings.
pacs:
73.43.f, 72.25.Dc, 85.75.d, 73.61.rI Introduction
Mesoscopic rings offer an ideal testbed for the investigation of geometrical phase effects in quantum mechanics like the well known AharonovBohm (AB) effect Aharonov and Bohm (1959). Experimental observation of the energy spectra of quantum rings, showing clear signatures of AB periodicity, have been obtained by means of optical spectroscopy Lorke et al. (2000); Bayer et al. (2003). The predicted persistent currents Büttiker et al. (1983) have been experimentally measured, also on a single ring, in various experiments in metals Chandrasekhar et al. (1991); Bluhm et al. (2009); Bleszynski et al. (2009) and semiconductors Mailly et al. (1993). Phase effects, such as the AharonovCasher effect König et al. (2006); Borunda et al. (2008) and the Sagnac phase shift Zivkovic et al. (2008) have been studied. Although many of these features can be understood in terms of a single particle picture, quantum rings are also attractive laboratories, being quasi1D systems, to study manybody effects. A review about this topic can be found in Ref. Viefers et al., 2004. In conjunction with spinorbit interaction, quantum rings are an active field of research for spin manipulation Berche et al. (2010). Proposed devices, based on a ring geometry, include spinfilters Popp et al. (2003), spin beam splitters Foldi et al. (2006), spin current parametric pumping Citro and Romeo (2006), spin qubits Foldi et al. (2005), or quantum rings which can be used to compose networks for spintronic applications Foldi et al. (2009).
Topological insulators (TI) are a new class of timereversal invariant materials that have a bulk gap and protected surface states. These materials are distinguished from a trivial insulator (with no topological protected surface states) by a topological number Kane and Mele (2005a). In two dimensions, these materials exhibit the quantum spin Hall effect Kane and Mele (2005b); Bernevig et al. (2006) and typically are small gap semiconductors, with the peculiarity that their gap, originated from strong spinorbit coupling, is inverted with respect to that of a normal insulator, allowing for the presence of topologically protected edge states Kane and Mele (2005b); Bernevig et al. (2006); Xu and Moore (2006). At each boundary two gapless counterpropagating edge modes exist that have opposite spin and are related by Kramer’s theorem, known as helical edge modes. A successful realization of a two dimensional TI phase has been obtained in HgTe/CdTe quantum wells, where the topological phase has been confirmed with the observation of the ballistic helical edge channels König et al. (2007, 2008). TIs, with their dissipationless edge states, represent a new promising route to spin manipulation in semiconductors.
A ring geometry in a TI with its well localized wavefunctions is optimal for spin manipulation, using a magnetic flux. It has been proposed, on the basis of numerical transport calculations, that the AB effect in a topological insulator disc can be exploited to perform spin rotation and spin filtering Jiang and Shan , or to create a topological spin transistor Maciejko et al. (2010). Similar properties are expected in a general closed disk geometry connecting two quantum point contacts in which coherent oscillations in the magnetoconductance are expected due to the AB effect Chu et al. (2009). It is clear that, if experimentally confirmed, these properties can make the disk, ring and hole geometry extremely interesting also from an application point of view.
In this paper we consider the boundstates of a ring made from a twodimensional TI (see Fig. 1). The boundstates are found analytically as a function of a magnetic flux, piercing the ring hole, and dimensions of the ring in the topological nontrivial (edges states and bulk states) and topological trivial (only bulk states) regime. We show that the specific bandstructure of such TIs allows for manipulations of electron spin states using the magnetic flux and their readout through a spinselective persistent current in the ring.
In addition, the special topology of a ring introduces a new type of twolevel system consisting of inner and outeredge localized bound states where their mixing can be tuned by the flux. Together with the spin of an electron, these features allow for new ways to coherently manipulate quantum states in topological insulators.
The paper is organized as follows. In section II we solve the edge and bulk states of a TI in cylindrical coordinates, described by an effective fourband model for HgTe/CdTe quantum wells Bernevig et al. (2006), exactly. We summarize here, for the benefit of those who are not intersted in the more mathematical details, the main results of section II.
The total outofplane angular momentum is a conserved quantity of the system and we associate the halfodd integer quantum number to it, this fact permits us to separate azimuthal and radial variables in the spinor [Eq. (8)]. We can express the radial part of the spinor components [Eq. (22) and (26)] in general as a combination of ordinary and modified Bessel functions, both for the bulk [Eq. (24)] and edge modes [Eq. (30)].
We find the eigenstate spectrum by assuming vanishing boundary conditions for a ring, a disk or a hole geometry, obtainining transcendental secular equations, that we numerically solve for the eigenenergies, and eventually we obtain the corresponding eigenfunctions. So in general an eigenstate of the system can be labelled as , with the radial quantum number, associated with the number of nodes of the radial wavefunction, the total angular momentum and the spin .
In Section III we show the results of our calculation, in particular focusing on the bound states of a ring subject to the AB effect. We present the edge dispersion for a disk, a hole and a ring, where a minigap arises due to the confinement, which exponentially shrinks with increasing ring thicknesses. We show that the sign of the Dirac mass, which distinguishes the topologically trivial from the topologically nontrivial insulator, is important to the eigenstates in the gap but also in the bulk spectral region. We also calculate the persistent currents as a function of the magnetic flux.
In Section IV we consider the inclusion of Rashba spinorbit interaction which couples the two spinblocks. The main effect, for a sufficiently small interaction, is the opening of a spin splitting gap at specific values of the magnetic flux. As a consequence, we can perform coherent spin manipulations with the magnetic flux.
In Section V we present a scheme for the coherent manipulation of quantum states stored locally in the spin or the edge degrees of freedom of a TI ring, by means of an AB flux.
Ii Four band model of HgTe quantum wells
For a realistic description of a twodimensional topological insulator, we use the effective fourband model Bernevig et al. (2006); König et al. (2008) for HgTe quantum wells, composed out of the and subbands, and the electron spin degree of freedom (see Appendix B for a discussion of these basis states and the meaning of spin). The fourband Hamiltonian is built with respect to the basis , , , (see Eq. (50)), where the states are a mixing of the slike band with the lighthole band, and represents basically the heavyhole band. In this basis, stands for the sign of the total angular momentum projection of the and bands, i.e. the sum of spin and orbital angular momentum. In the absence of inversion symmetry breaking terms (as the Rashba interaction discussed in Section IV), the Hamiltonian is separable into two blocks related by timereversal symmetry Bernevig et al. (2006)
(1) 
with and where is the vector of Pauli matrices. In Eq. (1), , and the Dirac mass term with .
The parameters depend on the QW geometry. Realistic estimates can be made by a comparison of the effective model with a well established Kane Hamiltonian Novik et al. (2005). In the following we will use the parameter values meV nm, eV and meV . The parameter results only in a shift of the energy and we can set without loss of generality. The Dirac rest mass depends on the QW thickness and corresponds to the inverted (topologically nontrivial) regime whereas corresponds to the normal (topologically trivial) regime.
This model is able to describe both the edge states and the bulk states in a reasonable energy range Schmidt et al. (2009). We note that Eq. (1) is not restricted to HgTe QWs but describes also other twodimensional TIs like thin films of and . Liu et al. (2010) For the ring, it is useful to express Eq. (1) in polar coordinates , .
We now use and perform the unitary transformation
(2) 
which changes the old basis into , , , , we obtain the transformed Hamiltonian,
(3) 
with
(4)  
(5) 
where , represent the Pauli matrices for the spin (Kramer’s partners ) and pseudospin (, ) components, respectively.
In the following table we define the orbital angular momentum , the pseudo spin operator and the time reversal operator for the unsymmetrized and the symmetrized basis.

(6) 
We further introduce a total angular momentum operator as which commutes with
(7) 
The eigenstates of therefore can be used for the ring energy eigenstates. Consequently, we can write the spinors for the two blocks () of as
(8) 
where it is easy to verify that
(9) 
Now we need to find the radial wave functions . We note that the diagonal part of (putting ) is solved by Bessel functions. Similarly, if we put , the radial solution for each of the two blocks of can be expressed in terms of Bessel functions Recher et al. (2007). We consequently use the ansatz , with proportional to a function of the Bessel family, defined below (this will result in as we will show below). To include a magnetic flux threading the ring hole, we consider the vector potential . Using the minimal coupling procedure , with the electron charge, the inclusion of the magnetic flux is equivalent to
(10) 
with the magnetic flux quantum . The radial wave functions satisfy the Bessel differential equation
(11) 
with
(12) 
where . Using , we arrive at the following equations
(13) 
(14) 
with
(15) 
Eq. (14) is satisfied, employing the assumption of being a Bessel function (see Eq. (11)), if
(16) 
Therefore, for a given energy , there are four possible values for the wave vector
(17) 
with
(18)  
(19) 
Solutions with correspond to propagating modes, and is therefore described by the Hankel functions and . For , instead, can be expressed with the modified Bessel functions and describing an evanescent behavior (exponentially growing and decaying) along the radial direction.
ii.1 Condition for bulkpropagating modes
In the spectral range inside the bulk bands (), we expect Eq. (17) to produce two real () and two imaginary solutions. Note that for , also complex solutions for are possible. However, as long as which is the case for HgTe QWs. Here () are the modulus of the real(imaginary) solutions of obtained with the () sign from Eq. (17). The required condition is that
(20) 
which is satisfied if
(21) 
In HgTe QWs, , and the condition is automatically satisfied if , as expected.
Within this spectral region, the first component of the spinor in Eq. (8) can be expressed as
(22) 
with
(23)  
(24) 
where , . The expression for the second component can be found from Eq. (13) and using the following property of the Bessel functions
(25) 
with for , and , and for . We obtain
(26) 
with the diagonal matrix given by
(27) 
where, according to Eq. (15), we define
(28) 
with depending on whether is the modulus of a real or an imaginary solution of Eq. (17).
ii.2 Condition for edge modes
In order to have four imaginary solutions of Eq. (17), in the region , we need, being and , to satisfy the conditions and . The latter turns out to be the more restrictive one. In particular, if we want to observe the Dirac point of the edge states (of typical value ), the material parameters have to satify the following inequality Zhou et al. (2008)
(29) 
Again, and are the wave vector moduli of the four modes with imaginary wave vectors obtained from Eq. (17) with the and sign, respectively.
The spinors for edge states are also obtained from Eq. (8) with components described by Eqs. (22) and (26), but with an alternative definition of the basis vector and the diagonal matrix . They are given by
(30)  
(31) 
ii.3 Boundary conditions and secular equation
In order to obtain the energy levels and bound states of the ring, we need to solve the boundary problem. We assume a ring of radius and width and impose vanishing boundary conditions at
(32)  
(33) 
Details of this calculation can be found in Appendix A. Here we just note that the four former conditions plus the normalization of the wave function fix and lead to a transcendental secular equation for . We here remark in connection with rings in graphene Recher et al. (2007), that the inclusion of quadratic terms allows for a formulation of vanishing boundary conditions which is not allowed in the Dirac equation (only linear terms in ) of graphene as the wave function would vanish identically. There, a confinement on a circle can be formulated with an infinite mass boundary condition Berry and Mondragon (1987); Recher et al. (2007).
For the bulkpropagating region we obtain the secular equation described by Eq. (42), while for the edge states we obtain Eq. (43). For a fixed and , the secular equation is numerically solved. In the bulkpropagating region we obtain the eigenvalues where , , represents a radial quantum number, positive for conduction band modes and negative for valence band modes. The corresponding eigenstates are given by the spinors or in ket notation . We can think of the edge states, when system parameters allow their existence, as the system’s eigenstates with .
Iii Bound states and persistent current of the ring
When the mass parameter is negative (the topological nontrivial regime), our model accepts solutions in the (inverted) gap region . This solutions are exponentially localized near the external and internal boundaries respectively, and are addressed as edge states. In Fig. 2(a) we show the edge state dispersion for a relatively large and wide ring of radius nm and width nm calculated with Eq. (43) for a boundary condition including both ring edges. The physical content of this picture can be undestood remembering that for a given magnetic flux , the eigenstates of the ring are found at with an halfodd integer. It means that with we can move the eigenstates along the dispersion curves in Fig. 2(a), always having two subsequent states at unitarily spaced intervals on the axis, i.e. for we have states at . The curves with squares and circles represent the internal and external edge states respectively, as calculated from the decoupled boundary conditions with Eqs. (49) and (46). We can also think of them as originated from edge states of a disk (external one) and of a hole in a plane (internal one). Their dispersions are different because they are centered on two different effective radii (approximately at ). We note that their slope (which is an energy) is in fact approximately given Jiang and Shan by . This emerges naturally from the fact that the radial wave function has to close on itself in a roundtrip along the circumference.
When the ring width is small enough to permit a finite overlap of the helical edge states, internal and external edge states get mixed. Consequently, as shown in Fig. 2(a), the dispersion curve is modified into the anticrossing upper and lower bands separated by a minigap, as it was also predicted for a straight TI ribbon of finite width Zhou et al. (2008). In Fig. 2(b), we show the radial probability density of the edge state spinors of states at different points along the upper band (U) for . This picture gives us an understanding of the localization properties of the edge states near the minigap. The state at (at the anticrossing) is equally shared between the internal and external edges. Away from this anticrossing point (we plot the states with ), where the dispersion curve resembles that of the uncoupled edges, the edge states are strongly localized near one or the other boundary. This means that we are able to drag an electron from one edge of the ring to the other by tuning . Conversely, for the lower (L) band states exhibit opposite localization properties as compared to the upper band. The implications of this tunability for quantum information processing will be discussed in Section V.
For certain values of the flux (when a state is in correspondence with ), as expected, the minigap exponentially shrinks with increasing (see Fig. 3). However in a fully confined system, as our ring, the discreteness of levels can also lead to a saturation of the minigap at a finite value. For sufficiently small the edge modes can be pushed into the bulkregion, losing their edgecharacter and becoming the first of the bulkpropagating modes. In this case, the minigap is comparable or larger than the bulk gap itself (i.e. larger than ).
The presence of the edge states with energy in the bulk gap depends on the negativity of the Dirac rest mass , while for positive only bulk states exist. But the change of the mass sign has also effects on the bulk energy levels as can be seen in Fig. 4, which shows the lowest lying eigenergies with and for a ring of radius nm, width nm and for meV. Therefore the presence of the topological insulator phase in confined systems can also be deduced from bulkpropagating properties as measured by optical spectroscopy or tunneling transport experiments through the ring.
In Fig. 5, we show the dispersion curve as a function of the magnetic flux for the first bulkconducting mode for a relatively small and narrow ring of radius nm and width nm. We select a ring of small radius in order to enhance the magnitude of the persistent current, which is proportional to the derivative of the dispersion curves with respect to the magnetic flux, which grows with decreasing . The small confinement length leads, instead, to well separated eigenvalues corresponding to different radial quantum numbers . The energy level spacing, between energy eigenvalues of different radial quantum number (see Fig 9), scales, in fact, with . In Fig. 5(a) we show the states of the spin block with , and . As can be seen, also in the absence of the magnetic field, effective time reversal symmetry is broken within a single block. The presence of the second spinblock restores time reversal symmetry when , and states with the same , and opposite and are time reversal (or Kramer) partners. The dispersion curve is periodic in with periodicity given by the flux quantum .
The persistent current at zero temperature is given by
(34) 
where the sum runs over all occcupied states. In Fig. 6 we show the persistent current for a ring with the same parameters as used for Fig. 5. We consider an electron occupation number up to occupying the first radial mode with positive energy, subtracting the current contribution coming from all states below. In Fig 6(a) we consider injection of spinpolarized electrons corresponding to . As a consequence, the persistent current is finite even in the absence of a magnetic flux, and its sign directly reflects the spin polarization. While in Fig 6(b), both blocks can accommodate electrons and, accordingly, the current vanishes at zero magnetic field, respecting the time reversal symmetry of the model. However, we note that the spin current can be finite at . The currents are periodic in with the same periodicity as the dispersion curves in Fig. 5, and show the presence of kinks whenever different bands cross and electrons are forced to move from one to the other in order to maintain the groundstate of the system.
The persistent currents in Fig. 6 are calculated for an edge state () pushed into the bulk conduction band by the overlap between internal and external edge states. But generally, a similar behavior is observed for other bulk states of the ring (, not shown), where a spinselective behavior is not as obvious as in the contribution from the helical edge states. The reason for this phenomenon is that the Dirac mass breaks the symplectic symmetry and in a single block. In graphene rings with a smooth ring boundary the same symmetry is broken and leads to a valleydependent persistent current Recher et al. (2007). This physics in principle would allow to use rings in topological insulators as spindetectors where the direction of spin is mapped to the direction of the persistent current. Indeed currents shown in Fig 6(a) and (b) are well in the range accessible to experiments Mailly et al. (1993). The persistent current has also been calculated for a disk in an homogeneous magnetic field Chang and Lou . However, the topology of that system is qualitatively different from a ring.
Iv Rashba spinorbit interaction
We consider the inclusion of a Rashba spinorbit interaction as derived in Ref. Rothe et al., 2010, retaining only terms to first order in , which gives the most dominant contribution
(35) 
We use cylindrical coordinates and transform it into the symmetrized basis using Eq. (2). We obtain
(36) 
where is the Rashba coefficient. In particular, the Rashba interaction in HgTe quantum well can be tuned with a gate voltage, so that the induced spinsplitting gap varies from zero up to tens of meV pri .
We note that does not commute with and , and therefore will in general mix energy eigenstates of . We can still find a conserved physical observable by noting that the only effect of is to couple with . This motivates us to define the total angular momentum restricted to the band not
(37) 
where the operators are the same as described in Table (6), but their action is now restricted to states of the band only. This can be obtained by applying the projector to the operators defined in Table 6, so that and . It is clear that the Rashba term must conserve and indeed . On the other hand the spinors are eigenstates of and eigenstates of with eigenvalue
(38) 
Therefore, can only couple eigenstates of from the blocks and with
(39) 
The conservation of the “band” total angular momentum imposes that the only nontrivial matrix elements exist between the spinors and , with and two quantum numbers of the radial quantization, and the quantum number of the total angular momentum. In the following we will assume the eigenvalues of two different radial eigenstates () to be sufficiently distant in energy, and the Rashba term sufficiently small, such as to make the mixing induced by spinorbit negligible. Actually the strength of the Rashba term can be tuned in topological insulators, while the distance between neighbouring radial eigenstates increases for smaller , so that we can always restrict ourselves in a parameter range which makes the previous assumption valid.
The relevant matrix element of is
(40) 
which, using the Bessel function’s property Eq. (25), can be put in the form
(41) 
with , and where the coefficients , and , in squared parenthesis, are calculated for the indicated spinors . This expression is valid for both bulk and edge states, for which , respectively.
In Fig. 7, we show the effect of a Rashba term with meVnm on the dispersion relation of the first bulk modes of a ring with the same parameters as in Fig. 5. We note that the most significant signature is the opening of a splitting with an anticrossing behavior between the states and , and between their time reversed ones and (not shown).
V Coherent manipulation of spin and edge degrees of freedom
An ABring in a twodimensional topological insulator can be used to process quantum information. Our idea is to use the magnetic flux to manipulate a twolevel system of states and , which are good system eigenstates, but which can be coupled by some interaction for specific values of the flux (see the scheme in Fig. 8). At resonance, corresponding to the operational magnetic flux , the eigenstates of the system can be described by and , for the upper () and lower () band.
We identify in our TI ring two pairs of such twolevel systems. The first one, which is specific to a topological insulator ring, makes use of the external () and internal () edge states, which realize a system similar to that of a chargequbit in a double quantum dot Hayashi et al. (2003), but where charge separation is due to the nature of the edge states. A ring has actually an even number of Kramer’s partner and therefore it is topologically trivial, in the sense that scattering is allowed between the two different set of helical edge states localized at the internal and at the external boundaries. However for sufficiently large a degree of the topological protection remains, because the scattering is suppressed by their localization properties. As shown in Fig. 2(b), at zero flux, states of the same spin with and are strongly (exponentially) localized at the external and internal boundary respectively. Let us imagine to inject a state of definite spin into the state which is strongly localized at a single edge (see Fig. 2) and then nonadiabatically vary the flux from zero to the operational value , corresponding to . In this situation the eigenstates of the system are equally shared between the two edges and an energy splitting (the minigap) arises, due to the interedge overlap. The original state will now be subjected to Rabi oscillations between the internal and the external boundaries with angular velocity . Read out of this twolevel system could be performed by connecting separately, with tunneling contacts, the internal and external boundary, or measuring the sign of the flux generated by the persistent current (cf. Fig. 6).
Another, more canonical choice, initially proposed in Ref. Loss and DiVincenzo, 1998 is to use the spin degree of freedom and to associate and with referring to the upper and lower block of the TI Hamiltonian with . This twolevel system is indeed topologically protected in a ring for a sufficiently large , or in a disk or hole geometry, from timereversal symmetric scattering, but still is subject to external decoherence sources, like the hyperfine interaction with an underlying nuclear spin system. The tunable Rashba term can offer a way to manipulate the spindegree of freedom Debald and Emary (2005), as implied by Fig. 7, where a spin splitting gap () opens between the state and the state around . The spin state could be observed by detected the persistent current, which is opposite for the two spin states (cf. Fig. 6).
Both spin and edge (i.e. charge) twolevel systems can be operated by the magnetic flux. For example, let us imagine to be initially in state , in a range of the flux value for which it is a good eigenstate of the system (see Fig. 8). Swiftly turning the magnetic flux to the operational value , and keeping it there for a time , will lead to the final rotated state described by . We can switch off the rotation by restoring the magnetic flux to its initial value. For the stability of the twolevel system it is required that the dephasing and relaxation time are much larger than the Rabi period . For these two kinds of twolevel systems (edge and spin), the splitting can be on the order of meV for reasonable parameters and , corresponding to a Rabi period of ps.
One can also exploit the ability to control the localization properties of an edge electron, that is, the possibility to move it from the internal to the external boundary by means of the flux, in a ring network. In such a system, spin qubits can be stored in the edge states localized on the internal boundary, the position in which they are protected from the interaction with the network. Bringing them to the external boundary, corresponds instead to put them in an active position, allowing for their measurements or for the interaction with qubits on other rings.
Vi Conclusion
In the present paper we have solved the eigenstates of a topological insulator for a ring, a disk and a hole structure, taking HgTe quantum wells as a practical example. We solved analytically the fourband model with both linear and quadratic terms, yielding a transcendental secular equation which we solved numerically as a function of the magnetic flux threading the ring. We calculated persistent currents, which can be exploited to measure the spin state of the system. The effect of a Rashba spinorbit term has also been taken into account, showing that its main effect is the opening of a spinsplitting gap at specific values of the magnetic flux. We proposed that, in a TI ring, spin and edge (charge) degrees of freedom, where either up/down spins or internal/external edges are used as quantum basis states (twolevel systems), can be coherently processed. Rashba interaction can be used to manipulate spin, while a finite edgestate overlap can be exploited to manipulate the edge degree of freedom, whereas the ABflux is used to introduce coherent dynamics of the twolevel system.
Acknowledgements.
P. M. and P. R. acknowledge financial support from the DFG via the Emmy Noether program, and B. Trauzettel, J. Budich, H. Buhmann and L.W. Molenkamp for helpful discussions.Appendix A Boundary conditions and secular equations
a.1 Bulkpropagating modes
The bulkpropagating eigenstates of a TI ring, of total angular momentum , can be written as as a linear combination of the spinors of the four modes , and as described by Eqs. (8), (22) and (26). Now, vanishing boundary conditions (Eq. (32) and (33)) impose the spinor components to vanish on the internal and external border and, toghether with the normalization condition, fix both the four coefficients and determine a the secular equation for the system eigenvalues. We obtain the following secular equation
(42)  
where we adopted the following notations
Once the transcendental equation Eq. (42) is solved for the eigenenergy, the coefficients are obtained by solving the boundary conditions. Note that these results depend on through the terms and .
For a given value of the quantum numbers and , the secular equation gives a series of eigenstates labeled by a radial quantum number , with corresponding to the number of nodes of the second component . Generally with edge states have and bulk propagating states are labeled by ,,, where are for conduction and valence band states, respectively. When no edge states are present and bulkpropagating modes are labelled by ,,. As an example, in Fig. 9, we show the numerical solution for of a TI ring in the inverterd regime ( meV) of radius nm and width , and nm. The red curve corresponds to in Eq. (42) and its zeros define the system eigenvalues. Note that the first zero, for the case with nm, corresponds to an edge state pushed into the bulk conduction band by the overlap between internal and external edges (and it is therefore the state). The dotted lines correspond to the analytic fit where are calculated at the energy , with the parameter nm. As can be seen, this fitting curve well reproduces the spacing between the eigenvalues of the system. The solutions are therefore determined by the energy for which . With different values of the mass, we need to adequately fit a new , which appears to decrease with . For and meV the best fit is given by and nm, respectively.
In Fig. 10(a) and (b) we show the and radial modes of the system described in Fig. 9(a), corresponding to an energy of meV and meV, respectively.
a.2 Edge states
In the gap spectral regions of a TI ring, we find evanescent solutions (i.e. helical edge states) if . For a set of quantum numbers and , Eqs. (8), (22) and (26), togheter with the definition of Eq. (30), describe the two spinor components. Now, solving vanishing boundary conditions (Eq. (32) and (33)) and the normalization of the wavefunction, we are led to the secular equation
(43)  
This equation fixes the eigenenergies, while the corresponding spinor coefficients can be obtained by solving, for a fixed energy, the boundary conditions.
a.2.1 Isolated boundaries: disk and hole
If we consider sufficiently large so as to effectively isolate the two boundaries, or just consider a disk or hole geometry, we can independently solve the internal ( sign in Eqs. (32) and (33)) and external ( sign in Eqs. (32) and (33)) boundary conditions. The internal boundary conditions (hole geometry), for themselves, are compatible with and give
(44)  
(45) 
which results in the secular equation
(46) 
For a given energy, the coefficients and are then obtained with the same boundary conditions. The problem of holes in a TI has also been addressed in Ref. Shan et al., .
For the external boundary (disk geometry), consistent with , we find
(47)  
(48) 
and, therefore, the secular equation
(49) 
Again, the coefficients and are then found imposing the same boundary conditions for a fixed energy.
Appendix B Meaning of spin in topological insulators
The bands of a semiconductor, in the presence of spinorbit coupling, are characterized by their real total angular momentum (meaning orbital plus real spin). For our topological insulator we can express the relevant bands at the point as Novik et al. (2005)
where each one of the four pairs obeys , with the timereversal operator. The states considered in the effective 4band model are described as König et al. (2008)
(50) 
with and two set of Kramer’s partners. We can therefore explicitly express the spinor on the block as
(51) 
and similarly we can express its time reversal (we use here the unsymmetrized basis)
(52) 
We note that the two blocks , although often referred to as spin up and spin down blocks, do not exactly correspond to eigenstates up and down of the real spin along the axis. We can indeed, using Eq. (50), calculate the real spin expectation value of these two states, obtaining
(53) 
It is now clear that if we choose a spin quantization axis along , the orthogonal states will correspond to spin up and spin down eigenstates, respectively. Therefore, in principle, particles injected with spin along this direction will enter only states, conversely the ones with opposite spin will enter only states. However the spin quantization direction depends implicitly on energy through and . In conclusion, in a small enough energy range we can consider as spin states along the spin quantization axis given by Eq. (53) and it is meaningful to think of spin injection or detection processes, where the TI ring is coupled to external spinselective materials like ferromagnetic contacts or helical edge states of a two dimensional TI.
References
 Aharonov and Bohm (1959) Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959).
 Lorke et al. (2000) A. Lorke, R. J. Luyken, A. O. Govorov, J. P. Kotthaus, J. M. Garcia, and P. M. Petroff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2223 (2000).
 Bayer et al. (2003) M. Bayer, M. Korkusinski, P. Hawrylak, T. Gutbrod, M. Michel, and A. Forchel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 186801 (2003).
 Büttiker et al. (1983) M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, and R. Landauer, Phys. Lett. 96A, 365 (1983).
 Chandrasekhar et al. (1991) V. Chandrasekhar, R. A. Webb, M. J. Brady, M. B. Ketchen, W. J. Gallagher, and A. Kleinsasser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3578 (1991).
 Bluhm et al. (2009) H. Bluhm, N. C. Koshnick, J. A. Bert, M. E. Huber, and K. A. Moler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 136802 (2009).
 Bleszynski et al. (2009) A. C. Bleszynski, W. E. Shanks, B. Peaudecerf, E. Ginossar, F. von Oppen, L. Gralman, and J. G. E. Harris, Science 326, 272 (2009).
 Mailly et al. (1993) D. Mailly, C. Chapelier, and A. Benoit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2020 (1993).
 König et al. (2006) M. König, A. Tschetschetkin, E. M. Hankiewicz, J. Sinova, V. Hock, V. Daumer, M. Schafer, C. R. Becker, H. Buhmann, and L. W. Molenkamp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 076804 (2006).
 Borunda et al. (2008) M. F. Borunda, X. Liu, A. A. Kovalev, X.J. Liu, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Phys. Rev. B 78, 245315 (2008).
 Zivkovic et al. (2008) M. Zivkovic, M. Jaaskelainen, C. P. Search, and I. Djuric, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115306 (2008).
 Viefers et al. (2004) S. Viefers, P. Koskinen, P. S. Deo, and M. Manninen, Physica E 21, 1 (2004).
 Berche et al. (2010) B. Berche, C. Chatelain, and E. Medina, Eur. J. Phys. 31, 1267 (2010).
 Popp et al. (2003) M. Popp, D. Frustaglia, and K. Richter, Nanotechnology 14, 347 (2003).
 Foldi et al. (2006) P. Foldi, O. Kalman, M. G. Benedict, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 73, 155325 (2006).
 Citro and Romeo (2006) R. Citro and F. Romeo, Phys. Rev. B 73, 233304 (2006).
 Foldi et al. (2005) P. Foldi, B. Molnar, M. G. Benedict, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 71, 033309 (2005).
 Foldi et al. (2009) P. Foldi, O. Kalman, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 80, 125324 (2009).
 Kane and Mele (2005a) C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005a).
 Kane and Mele (2005b) C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005b).
 Bernevig et al. (2006) B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.C. Zhang, Science 314, 1757 (2006).
 Xu and Moore (2006) C. Xu and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. B 73, 045322 (2006).
 König et al. (2007) M. König, S. Wiedmann, C. Brune, A. Roth, H. Buhmann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.L. Qi, and S.C. Zhang, Science 318, 766 (2007).
 König et al. (2008) M. König, H. Buhmann, L. W. Molenkamp, C.X. Liu, X.L. Qi, and S.C. Zhang, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 77, 031007 (2008).
 (25) Z.F. Jiang and W.Y. Shan, arXiv:0908.0890v1.
 Maciejko et al. (2010) J. Maciejko, E.A. Kim, and X.L. Qi, Phys. Rev. B 82, 165409 (2010).
 Chu et al. (2009) R.L. Chu, J. Li, J. K. Jain, and S.Q. Shen, Phys. Rev. B 80, 081102(R) (2009).
 Novik et al. (2005) E. G. Novik, A. PfeufferJeschke, T. Jungwirth, V. Latussek, C. R. Becker, G. Landwehr, H. Buhmann, and L. W. Molenkamp, Phys. Rev. B 72, 035321 (2005).
 Schmidt et al. (2009) M. J. Schmidt, E. G. Novik, M. Kindermann, and B. Trauzettel, Phys. Rev. B 79, 241306(R) (2009).
 Liu et al. (2010) C.X. Liu, H. J. Zhang, B. Yan, X.L. Qi, T. Frauenheim, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 81, 041307 (2010).
 Recher et al. (2007) P. Recher, B. Trauzettel, A. Rycerz, Y. M. Blanter, C. W. J. Beenakker, and A. F. Morpurgo, Phys. Rev. B 76, 235404 (2007).
 Zhou et al. (2008) B. Zhou, H.Z. Lu, R.L. Chu, S.Q. Shen, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 246807 (2008).
 Berry and Mondragon (1987) M. V. Berry and R. J. Mondragon, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 412, 53 (1987).
 (34) K. Chang and W. K. Lou, arXiv: 1010.4153v1.
 Rothe et al. (2010) D. G. Rothe, R. W. Reinthaler, C.X. Liu, L. W. Molenkamp, S.C. Zhang, and E. M. Hankiewicz, New J. Phys. 12, 065012 (2010).
 (36) Private communications with L.W. Molenkamp and H. Buhmann.
 (37) The real total angular momentum operator , which commutes with both and , could have also been used to arrive at the same conclusions.
 Hayashi et al. (2003) T. Hayashi, T. Fujisawa, H. D. Cheong, Y. H. Jeong, and Y. Hirayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 226804 (2003).
 Loss and DiVincenzo (1998) D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998).
 Debald and Emary (2005) S. Debald and C. Emary, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 226803 (2005).
 (41) W.Y. Shan, J. Lu, H.Z. Lu, and S.Q. Shen, arXiv: 1010.0503v2.