Archimedean-Type Force in a Cosmic Dark Fluid:
Ii. Qualitative and Numerical Study
Of a Multistage Universe Expansion
In this (second) part of the work we present the results of numerical and qualitative analysis, based on a new model of the Archimedean-type interaction between dark matter and dark energy. The Archimedean-type force is linear in the four-gradient of the dark energy pressure and plays a role of self-regulator of the energy redistribution in a cosmic dark fluid. Because of the Archimedean-type interaction the cosmological evolution is shown to have a multistage character. Depending on the choice of the values of the model guiding parameters, the Universe’s expansion is shown to be perpetually accelerated, periodic or quasiperiodic with finite number of deceleration/acceleration epochs. We distinguished the models, which can be definitely characterized by the inflation in the early Universe, by the late-time accelerated expansion and nonsingular behavior in intermediate epochs, and classified them with respect to a number of transition points. Transition points appear, when the acceleration parameter changes the sign, providing the natural partition of the Universe’s history into epochs of accelerated and decelerated expansion. The strategy and results of numerical calculations are advocated by the qualitative analysis of the instantaneous phase portraits of the dynamic system associated with the key equation for the dark energy pressure evolution.
pacs:04.20.-q, 04.40.-b, 04.40.Nr
The concepts of dark energy (DE) and dark matter (DM) DE1 ()-DM3 () considered as two manifestations of one unified dark fluid DF1 ()-DF5 () are basic elements of modern cosmology and astrophysics. Because the dark fluid is estimated to accumulate about of the Universe’s energy, the coupling of DE with DM predestine the main features of the Universe evolution. In the first part of the work antigauss () we introduced the so-called Archimedean-type force, which is linear in the four-gradient of the DE pressure and acts on the DM particles. This force is a relativistic generalization of the classical Archimedean force and belongs to the class of effective forces described in BZ1 ()-BZ6 (). From mathematical point of view the presented model gives us a new self-consistent nonlinear scheme of interaction between two constituents of the cosmic medium. From physical point of view the Archimedean-type force is an effective redistributor of the total energy of the Universe between the DE and DM constituents. The Archimedean-type model can be also considered in terms of two-fluid representation of the cosmic medium M1 ()-M6 (), in which the interaction terms appear in the right-hand sides of separate balance equations for the DE and DM with opposite signs and which disappear in a sum, when one deals with the total balance equation. We formulated in antigauss () the theory of interaction between DE and DM by using the relativistic hydrodynamics for dark energy and relativistic kinetics for dark matter.
In the first paper antigauss () we focused on the submodels with some special values of guiding parameters, which admit exact analytical solutions of the total self-consistent system of master equations; in particular, we discussed the so-called anti-Gaussian solution. Now we consider the results of numerical and qualitative analysis for all admissible sets of guiding parameters and initial data. This paper is organized as follows. In Sec.II we recall briefly the key equations and basic formulas of the model with Archimedean-type coupling between dark energy and dark matter. In Sec.III the numerical results are presented: in Sec.III A we explain the scheme of numerical analysis and details of results representation; in Sec.III B we classify the models using the number of transition points and discuss details of seven submodels, the perpetually accelerated and periodic universes being among them. In Sec.IV we analyze the model of Archimedean-type coupling in terms of dynamic system associated with nonlinear key equation for the DE pressure; in Sec.IV A we study the toy model, which relates to the autonomous dynamic system, find critical points and discuss two basic phase portraits of this system; in Sec.IV B we analyze instantaneous phase portraits of a general nonautonomous dynamic system in the context of numerical results presented in Sec.III; in Sec.IV C we consider asymptotical behavior of the models. Sec.V contains discussions: in Sec.V A we attract an attention to the inflationary behavior of the model in the early Universe; in Sec.V B we show that all the models under discussion manifest the late-time accelerated expansion; in Sec.V.C we touch on the coincidence problem.
Ii Master equations of the toy model
ii.1 Dynamic parameters of the Universe
In order to describe the Universe’s evolution from the dynamic point of view, we find three key functions: the scale factor , the Hubble function and the acceleration parameter given by the standard definitions,
The space-time is considered to be of the spatially homogeneous Friedmann-Lematre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) type with the metric
When all the functions describing the state of the Universe, , depend on time through the scale factor , it is convenient to use the new variable and the following relations, associated with :
The last equality gives the scale factor , when is found from the Einstein equations, which can be written in the form
The quantities in the right-hand sides of the Einstein equations are interpreted as follows: is the energy density of the dark energy and is its pressure; and are, respectively, the total energy density and the total pressure of the dark matter. In these terms the acceleration parameter can also be represented as
ii.2 Balance equations
It was shown in the first part of our work that the separate equations of the energy balance for the DM and DE constituents of the dark fluid can be presented in the form
where is a partial pressure of the DM particles of the sort and is the guiding parameter associated with the Archimedean-type force.
The state functions and , which characterize the DM constituent, are presented by the integrals
where the following auxiliary quantities are introduced
ii.3 Key equation of the toy model
Clearly, the key element of the toy model is the function ; to find the DE pressure we use the key equation
where the prime denotes the derivative with respect to . The source term is generally presented by the integral
and we use them for numerical calculations. For the qualitative analysis we use the explicit model expression for the source term
Here denotes the initial value for the DE pressure (let us remind that ). When we deal with massless particles, the corresponding source term coincides with (19), if
When we deal with the cold dark matter, we use the source term (19) with
Thus, the key equation (17) is the ordinary differential equation of the second order linear in the derivatives of the unknown function , and nonlinear in the function itself.
Let us mention that, when , the effective guiding parameter can be introduced instead of . Indeed, using a new unknown function one can rewrite the key equation (17) in the form
Clearly, the parameters and coincide at .
Iii Numerical results
iii.1 About the scheme of analysis
We analyze the Archimedean-type model as follows. First, we integrate the key equation (17) with the source term (18) and find the DE pressure . Then we calculate the function using (11), the functions and using (12) and (13), respectively, then we find the Hubble function using (5), the acceleration parameter using (6) and finally the scale factor using (3). Let us make seven remarks about the scheme of numerical analysis.
1. The solution for the DE pressure depends on the following guiding parameters: , , , , , and on two initial values , . We fulfilled systematic numerical calculations by varying one of these parameters and fixing the remaining ones, and then we classified the obtained plots picking out principally different classes of solutions. For the numerical analysis we used two-component DM model, one component being massless (ultrarelativistic), another one being cold (nonrelativistic). Nevertheless, in order to illustrate the main details of the Universe expansion on the plots we considered only one (leading) component of the DM. Below we summarize the results, emphasize the main features, but do not discuss details of numerical calculations.
2. For a number of sets of the guiding parameters and initial data, mentioned above, the behavior of the solution is of a singular type, i.e., the scale factor, Hubble function, or/and DE pressure, DE energy, etc., can take infinite values at a finite time moment ; we do not discuss such solutions here.
3. We omit the discussion of submodels for which the DM energy density and DM pressure grow infinitely at or tend to finite (nonvanishing) asymptotic values. In other words, we restrict ourselves by the submodels, for which the DE component dominates over DM starting from definite time moment; this motive explains why we consider the parameters to be unchanged in the presented plots.
4. There exist a lot of sets of the guiding parameters for which the solutions for the DE energy and DE pressure are asymptotically unstable; we do not focus on them here.
5. We discuss only the solutions for which the total energy is non-negative for arbitrary , thus guaranteeing that is a real function [see (5)].
6. In order to describe the Archimedean-type model completely we have to indicate the domain in the multidimensional space of parameters , , , , , , and in which the solutions are nonsingular and asymptotically stable; we hope to solve this problem in a special paper and do not discuss them here.
7. Figures 1-7 present the results of numerical calculations and are organized as follows. In the first panels labeled (a)  the plot of the DE energy is presented; (b) contains the plot of the DM energy density ; the DE pressure and DM pressure are presented in panels (c) and (d), respectively; the plot of the Hubble function can be found in panels (e); the acceleration parameter is placed in (f), and finally, the plots of the scale factor are given in (g). Let us remind, that the parameter specifies the logarithmic scale in figure panels (a)-(f), and the value corresponds to ; the plots in panels (g) are presented in terms of logarithm of the normalized cosmological time .
iii.2 Multistage character of the Universe’s evolution
The analysis of the pictures presented in Figs.1(f),2(f),3(f),4(f),5(f),6(f), and 7(f) shows explicitly that for a wide choice of sets of the parameters , , , , , , and the function is not monotonic and can change the sign. We indicate the points, in which the function changes the sign, as transition points, which divide the history of the Universe into deceleration/acceleration epochs; we denote these points as . The epochs with accelerated expansion can give way to the epochs with deceleration, the number of changes being finite or infinite. When the (continuous) curve has extrema, it is natural to divide the corresponding epochs into eras, the number of eras relates to the number of maximums and minimums. Thus, depending on the number of transition points (related to the number of (simple) roots of the equation ), we divide below all the models into three classes and into a number of sub-classes.
iii.2.1 Perpetually accelerated universe (no transition points)
The first class of models relates to the case when the function is non-negative for . In antigauss () we discussed the so-called anti-Gaussian model: exact solutions in this model were presented in terms of elementary functions at . In particular, the acceleration parameter obtained there, , is a monotonic positively defined function exceeding the value , the acceleration parameter for the de Sitter models. In other words, there are no transition points, there is no splitting of the history into epochs and eras, when we deal with an anti-Gaussian universe. Another example presented in antigauss () describes superexponential expansion with the acceleration parameter given by . The plot of this function starts with , reaches the maximum at , and tends asymptotically to . In the context of our terminology, we also deal with perpetually accelerated universe, but its history is now divided into two eras. Here we discuss an alternative example of a perpetually accelerated universe with , studied numerically. Typical pictures illustrating this class of models are given in Fig.1.
The solid curve in Fig.1(f) touches the line in one point, other curves lie above , thus there are no transition points. In this class of models the acceleration parameter as a function of time is non-negative for arbitrary : this means that the accelerated expansion of the Universe is perpetual. For the model under discussion the DE energy density is (perpetually) non-negative [see Fig.1(a)], the DE pressure is nonpositive. The acceleration parameter, the DE energy density and pressure, and the Hubble function change nonmonotonically with time, thus, the statefinder parameter , introduced in statefinder (), is necessary to describe the details of the Universe’s evolution. We do not focus now on these fine details of the model and their physical interpretation, nevertheless, we have to stress, that extrema of the function divide naturally the history of the Universe into the corresponding eras, thus describing the multistage character of its evolution.
The history of a perpetually accelerated universe includes only one epoch, but consists at least of six eras. Indeed, one can clearly identify at least three maximums and two minimums of the curve which divide the acceleration epoch into six eras. The first era () can be indicated as the era of a first superacceleration. During this era the DE energy - density, , grows monotonically [see Fig.1(a)], the DM energy density, , decreases [see Fig.1(b)], but at the beginning of the era DM dominates over the DE from the point of view of energy contribution. The second era finishes with slumps of the DE energy density, of the Hubble function and of the acceleration parameter. The DE pressure, which reached its global maximum at this moment, becomes, clearly, a locomotive power of further universe evolution. The third era can also be indicated as the era of super-acceleration, which is characterized by the growth of DE energy density and the Hubble parameter. Fourth, fifth, etc. eras can be considered in terms of relaxation to the state with asymptotically constant positive values , , and negative . The behavior of the DM state functions and during the second, third, etc. eras can not be recognized in the plots in Fig.1(b) and Fig.1(d), that is why we visualize their behavior specially in the discussion below using more appropriate scale (see Fig.11 and Fig.12).
iii.2.2 Periodic models (infinite number of transition points)
We indicate the model by the term periodic when the equation has an infinite number of roots and the history of the Universe splits into infinite number of identical epochs with accelerated and decelerated expansion. Clearly, it is the case opposite to the first one (perpetually accelerated universe). Figure 2 illustrates this terminology: the DE energy density and DE pressure, as well as the Hubble function and acceleration parameter oscillate with fixed frequency and amplitude (we should keep in mind that the time scale in Fig.2 (a)-(f) is logarithmic, so that the frequency seems to be visually increasing). In the model presented in Fig.2 the DE energy density is non-negative, the averaged over time (mean) value of the DE pressure is negative, and the sum is positive. The plots in the Fig.2(e) and Fig.(2)(f) demonstrate that the stable oscillatory regime starts in the Universe after the second transition point. The first epoch is characterized by the decelerated expansion and consists of three eras; at the end of the first era () the DM contribution into the total energy density becomes negligible in comparison with the DE contribution. The second epoch relates to the accelerated expansion and can be split into two eras, the maximal value of the acceleration parameter being about 3 times smaller than for the subsequent epochs. The scale factor oscillates near the de Sitter curves [see Fig.2(g)]. The periodic model can be obtained as a limiting case, when the parameter tends to its critical value .
iii.2.3 Universe evolution with a finite number of transition points
Let us focus on the models for which the equation has a finite number of simple roots, . This means that during the Universe evolution the epochs with accelerated expansion are changed times by the deceleration epochs, and vice versa. When the roots are not simple, special attention to such models is necessary, since the existence of the root does not guarantee the change of the sign of the function (e.g., when the root is double, the curve touches the line , and this root does not give a transition point). The class of models with transition points can be naturally divided into subclasses with , , etc.; every subclass can be divided into sub-subclasses according to physical and geometrical motivation. Let us focus on the basic ones.
(i) One transition point.
Figure 3 illustrates the subclass of models, for which the plot of the acceleration parameter (see Fig.3(f)) can be visualized as a deformed Heaviside step-function. The change of the deceleration epoch by the acceleration epoch takes place only once in a narrow time period, and the plot looks like a typical picture for a phase transition. Taking into account the plot of the Hubble function [see Fig.3(e)] one can conclude that the Universe’s evolution starts and finishes on quasi de Sitter asymptotes with different Hubble constants . The functions , , related to the DE component of the dark fluid, monotonically increase, and the functions , , related to the DM, monotonically decrease, the sum being non-negative for arbitrary . The second epoch, characterized by the accelerated expansion, looks like the de Sitter-type stage with and vanishing and . The first and second epochs are not divided into eras in the framework of this model.
Figure 4 illustrates an alternative subclass of models with one transition point. In contrast to the first example, the functions , , , and have extrema, so that one can pick out two eras in both epochs of the Universe history. This model also describes the transition from one de Sitter-type universe to another one with different Hubble constants . It is important to stress that the DM pressure is not monotonic now: in contrast to the DM energy density, the DM pressure grows in the early Universe, reaches the maximum and then decreases quickly in the deceleration epoch.
(ii) Two transition points.
The example of the model with two transition points is given in Fig.5. The behavior of the functions , , , and is similar to the one, given in Fig.1, but there are new details in the panels (d) and (f). First, the DM pressure reaches maximum at the end of the first era of the first acceleration epoch. The second new detail is that the deceleration epoch appears, which separates two acceleration epochs with different asymptotic values of the Hubble function.
(iii) Three transition points.
The model which displays two epochs of decelerated expansion and two epochs of accelerated evolution, is presented by Fig.6. The graph of the function is of the so-called type. The start of the Universe’s expansion relates to the deceleration epoch, which is then replaced by a short acceleration epoch as in the case of the periodic model [compare Fig.6(f) with Fig.2(f)]. The Universe’s evolution during the second epoch of decelerated expansion and the subsequent second accelerated epoch is analogous to the model with one transition point (compare Fig.6(f) with Fig.3(f)). Clearly, the second (final) accelerated epoch is of the de Sitter type.
(iv) Quasiperiodic evolutionary models.
Figure 7 illustrates the behavior of the model with a big but finite number of transition points. The first, second, and third epochs of deceleration, as well as the first, second, and third epochs of accelerated expansion in this model have the same character as for the periodic model [compare with Fig.2(f)]. Nevertheless, starting from some transition point with the number , i.e., when , the curve remains above the line , thus, later the Universe’s expansion is accelerated. Clearly, this model is intermediate between the model with two transition points [see Fig.5] and periodic model [see Fig.2]. The behavior of the functions , , and is quasiperiodic: the amplitudes of their oscillations decrease asymptotically. Late-time behavior in average is of the de Sitter type with positive DE energy density and negative DE pressure. The interest in such models has been renewed after publication of the paper Penrose ().
Iv Qualitative analysis
In Sec.III we classified the solutions obtained numerically according to the number of transition points, in which the decelerated expansion of the Universe is changed by the accelerated expansion and vice versa. In order to explain the results qualitatively, below we analyze the key equations by two methods: constructing the phase portraits and using asymptotic analysis. First of all, we consider the example of the model with , for which the key equation can be reduced to the autonomous dynamic system; we find critical points and draw the corresponding phase portraits. On the basis of these results we study nonautonomous dynamic systems with taking into account that critical points of this nonautonomous system remain of the same type as for the case , but they drift with time on the phase plane. Finally, we analyze three asymptotic limits: , and , which allow us to simplify the key equation significantly.
iv.1 Dynamic system associated with the key equation
Let us introduce new variables , and as follows
The quantity is non-negative due to its definition (24). tends to zero in two different cases: first, when , or second, asymptotically at , if is finite. The initial value for the parameter , relates to the moment and, respectively, , then initial data for the integral curves in terms of these variables are the following:
Generally, this dynamic system is nonautonomous because of the term linear in in the second equation. Nevertheless, there is a case when the system (25) becomes autonomous. Let us consider this case in more detail.
iv.1.1 Autonomous dynamic system at
The autonomous dynamic system
contains only two control parameters: and , the parameter being now positive. The new dimensionless parameter
plays an interesting role in further analysis. Physically appropriate integral curves should be situated in the domain on the plane . We consider the integral curves, which penetrate into the domain , as nonadmissible and omit the models with the corresponding set of guiding parameters. The qualitative analysis of the two-parameter autonomous dynamic system (28) demonstrates the following interesting features.
iv.1.2 Critical points
When and , there are two critical points associated with this dynamic system. The first critical point
is the saddle one, when , and is the stable nodal point, when . The second critical point is
and it coincides with the first one, when , i.e., when . Generally, the second critical point can be
(i) the saddle point, when (the first critical point is the nodal one);
(ii) the stable nodal point, when (the first critical point is the saddle one);
(iii) the stable focus, when (the first critical point is the saddle one); or
(iv) the degenerated node, when (the first critical point is the saddle one).
iv.1.3 Two phase portraits of the autonomous dynamic system
A typical phase portrait of the autonomous dynamic system with a stable node and a saddle point is presented in Fig.8. Integral curves in the northern and western domains, which are cut out by the separatrices of the saddle point with coordinates , , tend asymptotically to the nodal point with , . All the integral curves in the southern and eastern domains of this saddle point can be asymptotically characterized by infinite values of and/or .
A typical phase portrait of the autonomous dynamic system with a focus and a saddle point is given in Fig.9. The domain of quasiperiodic motion is situated in the south-western domain, which is cut out by the separatrices of the saddle point at , . This quasiperiodic motion is associated with the presence of the focus at , . Curves walking in three other domains are asymptotically unstable.
iv.2 On the behavior of the nonautonomous dynamic system with
When and the dynamic system is autonomous, there are two typical phase portraits, given by Fig.8 and Fig.9. The qualitative difference between them is predetermined by specific combinations of the guiding parameters , , and : any changes on the phase space are associated with variations of these guiding parameters. Typical phase portraits with fixed guiding parameters remain unchanged with time, and the integral curves can be prolonged till . When , the dynamic system is nonautonomous, nevertheless, one can describe such a model qualitatively in terms of instantaneous phase portrait distortion, in terms of (quasi)critical points drift, and their transformations. One can stress that in this case a restructuring of the instantaneous phase portraits can take place because of time growth, when the guiding parameters remain unchanged.
iv.2.1 Critical points drift and transformation
Let us consider a close vicinity of the point and put the value to the right-hand side of the second equation (25). In the small vicinity of (, and is a small deviation) we can consider (quasi) critical points in analogy with true critical points, studied in the previous case. The first (quasi) critical point relates to , , when , and , , when . In both cases these points disappear from the admissible part of the dynamic plane . Other (quasi) critical points relate to the value , and the corresponding values can be found from the transcendent equation
The plot of the function is presented in Fig.10.
The function has the minimum at , which divides the corresponding curve into two branches: the first of them is situated at (left branch), and the second one relates to the interval (right branch). Clearly, Eq. (32) has no solutions, when or equivalently when , where the critical time moment is
Eq. (32) has only one (double) root, when , or ; there are two different roots, when or equivalently . In other words, there are no (quasi)critical points at , one point appears at , and two (quasi)critical points appear in the instantaneous phase portrait, when .
The first (quasi)critical point indicated as drifts to infinity, since the value , for which the right branch of the curve happens to be crossed by the horizontal straight line, increases with . In order to recognize the type of this (quasi) critical point, let us find the roots of the characteristic equation associated with the dynamic system in the vicinity of the point with coordinates ,
At the critical moment of time the equality takes place, and we deal with the degenerated node; when , there are two real roots of different signs, thus the (quasi)critical point is the saddle one.
The second (quasi)critical point drifts to the point when increases, since the value , for which the left branch of the curve crosses the horizontal straight line, tends to zero. The type of the second (quasi)critical point depends on the value and on the relation between parameters and .
(i) When , or equivalently
the discriminant in (35) is always positive, the roots of characteristic equations are real and negative, thus the second (quasi)critical point is a stable node for each . We deal with the phase portrait, which contains a stable node and a saddle point .
(ii) When we face the reconstruction of the phase portraits with time. Indeed, one can fix two moments of time, and , defined as
for which the discriminant in (35) takes zero value. Since tends to zero with time, one obtains three subsequent situations: first, when the roots are real, i.e., is a node; second, when , the roots are complex numbers, i.e., is a focus; third, when the roots are real again, i.e., is a node. One can guarantee, that the nodes and focus are stable, if .
(iii) If , evidently, there exists a moment , when the decreasing quantity becomes equal to the parameter . At this moment , i.e., the focus transforms into a center. It is possible, when
Finally, at the moments and the discriminant in (35) vanishes, i.e., the corresponding points should be classified as degenerated nodes.
iv.2.2 Phase portrait distortion and transformation
Let us consider the plots in Fig.1(c),2(c),3(c),4(c),5(c),6(c), and 7(c), obtained numerically, from the point of view of qualitative analysis of the models with . In fact we take two typical phase portraits: for a node and a saddle point [Fig.8], and for a focus and saddle point [Fig.9], and provide the changes of two types. First, we move the (quasi)critical points horizontally, thus distorting the instantaneous phase portrait; second, we replace the node by focus and vice-versa, thus modeling transitions in the instantaneous phase portraits with time.
1. Figure1(c): perpetually accelerated universe.
For the given values of the guiding parameters we have , i.e., the inequality is valid [see the discussion of Eq. (37) above]. The zone can be indicated as precritical, the function , the DE pressure, decreases there, since the initial value is negative. Then, as it was qualitatively predicted, the focus appears on the instantaneous phase portrait, so that the DE pressure enters the zone of damped quasioscillations.
2. Figure 2(c): periodic universe.
For this model, clearly, both inequalities given by (38) are valid; in addition , thus it is a typical model with center [see the discussion od Eq. (38) above]. The presence of a center on the phase portrait explains the periodic graph of the DE pressure (the graph is presented in a logarithmic scale).
3. Figure 3(c): first model with one transition point.
There, clearly, the inequality (36) is valid, i.e., and we deal with the absence of focuses. Instantaneous phase portraits contain stable nodes only, the graph for the DE pressure has no quasioscillations.
4. Figure 4(c): second model with one transition point.
5. Figure 5(c): model with two transition points.
There, in both cases, we deal with the situation similar to the one in Fig.1(c).
6. Figure 6(c): model with three transition points.
The situation is analogous to the case given by Fig.3(c).
7. Figure 7(c): quasiperiodic universe. Again we deal with the set of guiding parameters, for which , and thus the stable focus appears in the instantaneous phase portrait of the dynamic system; quasioscillations of the DE pressure are typical for this model.
iv.3 Asymptotic behavior of the integral curves
Speaking about nonrelativistic and ultrarelativistic models, we distinguish between initially and effectively hot or cold states of the DM particles. When the parameters are much bigger or much smaller than 1, we deal with initially nonrelativistic or ultrarelativistic DM, respectively. In the course of the Universe expansion an initially cold DM can become effectively hot (effectively ultrarelativistic), when the term [see (14)]. Such terminology is advocated by the fact, that at one obtains , and the averaged kinetic energy of a DM particle becomes much bigger than the corresponding rest energy, even if initially at () the inequality had the form . Analogously, when , an initially hot DM converts into the effectively nonrelativistic, because the rest energy dominates over the kinetic energy of a DM particle. A new interesting case can appear due to the Archimedean-type force, when , despite the fact that . In this case one deals with the asymptotic fixation of the degree of relativism of the DM particles instead of standard effective cooling. Let us consider these asymptotic cases and analyze the model behavior for arbitrary values of the parameters .
iv.3.1 Asymptotic regime
In the absence of the Archimedean-type force, i.e., at , the function tends to zero asymptotically. When , the function can tend to infinity if the DE pressure takes negative infinite value, . In this asymptotic regime, when , the integrals in (12), (13), (18) can be easily calculated yielding
where the parameter is given by
Let us indicate the maximal parameter from the set as , the corresponding parameter as and as . Then one obtains that, when and , the leading order term in the left-hand side of the key equation (17) is and the reduced equation for is of the form
This means that at the derivatives , , etc., asymptotically vanish, and the behavior of the DE pressure is described by the function inverse to the integral exponent , where . The decomposition of this function at gives the transcendent equation
When , the asymptotic law is in accordance with the exact solution of the anti-Gaussian type, studied in the first part of the work antigauss (). The asymptotic behavior of the DE energy density is given by the formula [see (11)] and depends essentially on the sign of the parameter : it remains positive at , when . Concerning the DM energy density and DE pressure , these quantities grow exponentially; we do not consider the Hubble function and the scale factor for such models, since there is no observational data, which could confirm such behavior.
iv.3.2 Asymptotic regime
This asymptotic regime can be realized, when the DE pressure takes arbitrary positive or finite negative value at . The asymptotic behavior of this type relates to the vanishing source term
and vanishing DM energy density
Thus, the DE pressure satisfies now the Euler equation
which is studied in detail in Sec.III A of the first part of our work antigauss (). In particular, in Sec.III A 3, we have shown that there exist quasiperiodic oscillations near the asymptote , which are manifestly presented in Fig.1(c), Fig.4(c), Fig.5(c), Fig.7(c). The aperiodic solutions studied in Sec.III A 1, and Sec.III A 2 antigauss () clearly appear in Figs.3(c) and 6(c).
iv.3.3 Asymptotic regime
Let us suppose for simplicity that for all types of the DM particles, and let the corresponding function tend to a nonvanishing constant value , when . This means that asymptotic behavior of the DE pressure is the following
Then the initial data require that , and the source term (18) takes asymptotically the following form
i.e., it decreases as at . The left-hand side of Eq. (17) vanishes after the substitution of (47), if and , i.e., the asymptotic regime exists at special conditions only. The DE and DM energy densities behave in this case as
The Hubble function, scale factor and acceleration parameters are given by the following formulas
which, clearly, describe the anti-Gaussian solution studied in the first part of the work antigauss ().
The Archimedean-type model can describe qualitatively two cornerstones of the Universe’s evolution: the inflation in the early Universe and the late-time accelerated expansion. Also, this model offers a variant explanation of the so-called coincidence problem, and it gives some motivation for the specific division of the Universe’s history into epochs and eras. Let us consider these questions in more detail.
v.1 Inflation in the early Universe
When Fig.1(a), 2(a),3(a),4(a),5(a),6(a), and 7(a) display the first inflationary-type epoch: one can reveal a quick growth of the DE energy density . During this period of the Universe evolution the scale factor increases essentially: in order to visualize this inflationary effect we presented additionally the fragment of the plot in the natural scale instead of the logarithmic one [see Fig.11(a)]. The steepness of the plot of is predetermined by the combination of the guiding parameters; there are a lot of possibilities to fit the observed curve by the curve predicted in the framework of the Archimedean-type model. In the context of expansion the growth of the DE energy density in the early Universe relates to the heating of the DE component of the dark fluid. Clearly [compare, e.g., the panels (a) and (b) in Figs.1-7] the sum remains non-negative for the whole interval of time. This feature provides the to be non-negative, which guarantees that is a real function. At the same time the DM energy density [see the panels (b)] decreases monotonically; nevertheless, the rate of its effective cooling differs essentially from the rate given by the standard powerlaw function ( for the ultrarelativistic DM or