Anisotropy induces nonFermiliquid behavior and nematic magnetic order in threedimensional Luttinger semimetals
Abstract
We illuminate the intriguing role played by spatial anisotropy in threedimensional Luttinger semimetals featuring quadratic band touching and longrange Coulomb interactions. We observe the anisotropy to be subject to an exceptionally slow renormalization group (RG) evolution so that it can be considered approximately constant when computing the impact of quantum fluctuations on the remaining couplings of the system. Using perturbative RG we then study the competition of all local shortrange interactions that are generated from the longrange interactions for fixed anisotropy. Two main effects come to light for sufficiently strong anisotropy. First, the threedimensional system features an Abrikosov nonFermi liquid ground state. Second, there appear qualitatively new fixed points which describe quantum phase transitions into phases with nemagnetic orders – higherrank tensor orders that break timereversal symmetry, and thus have both nematic and magnetic character. In real materials these phases may be realized through sufficiently strong microscopic shortrange interactions. On the pyrochlore lattice, the anisotropyinduced fixed points determine the onset of allinallout or spin ice ordering of local magnetic moments of the electrons.
I Introduction
Understanding Fermi points at highsymmetry band crossings in semimetallic materials constitutes a promising portal towards designing exotic states of matter Vafek and Vishwanath (2014). The intriguing properties of systems with linear band touching described by a lowenergy effective Dirac Hamiltonian have been studied extensively in graphene both theoretically and experimentally Herbut (2006); Castro Neto et al. (2009); Das Sarma et al. (2011). The recent advance in realizing threedimensional Weyl semimetals and the subsequent experimental verification of their peculiar properties marks another milestone on this road Xu et al. (2015); Lv et al. (2015). A quadratic band touching (QBT) point is realized in bilayer graphene and threedimensional Luttinger semimetals, the latter being described by the Luttinger Hamiltonian Luttinger (1956), which includes GaAs, HgTe, Sn, or the recently actively studied class of Pyrochlore Iridates Murakami et al. (2004); Moon et al. (2013); WitczakKrempa et al. (2014).
Systems with QBT become particularly interesting when strong spinorbit coupling leads to a band inversion such that both positive and negative energy states meet at the Fermi point. Furthermore, whereas the shortrange part of Coulomb interactions is screened in three dimensions, its longrange part substantially influences the manybody electron correlations. It has been pointed out by Abrikosov Abrikosov and Beneslavski (1971); Abrikosov (1974) and reinvestigated more recently Moon et al. (2013) that the interplay between an inverted QBT point and longrange Coulomb repulsion leads to a nonFermi liquid (NFL) ground state of the system. Both requirements for Abrikosov’s scenario are realized in the Pyrochlore Iridates Nakatsuji et al. (2006); Machida et al. (2010); Kurita et al. (2011); Balicas et al. (2011); WitczakKrempa et al. (2013); Rhim and Kim (2015); Kondo et al. (2015); Nakayama et al. (2016); Liang et al. (2016), which therefore constitutes an ideal experimental platform to test its predictions. It is found that for most members of the material class the ground state is a magnet with spins ordered in allinallout (AIAO) states on the tetrahedra of the pyrochlore lattice. An exception is given by PrIrO, which remains a bad metal for the lowest temperatures explored in experiment WitczakKrempa et al. (2014).
Although the density of states is proportional to the square root of energy at a QBT point in three dimensions so that the shortrange part of the Coulomb repulsion is technically irrelevant, shortrange interactions can still influence the phase structure of the model in two ways. First, if the corresponding coupling constant exceeds a certain critical value, they can lead to qualitatively different ordered states, represented in the renormalization group (RG) by a runaway flow. Second, even if initially absent, shortrange interactions are generated during the RG flow. The feedback of those shortrange couplings onto each other leads to the appearance of further fixed points, which may collide with Abrikosov’s infrared fixed point and annihilate it. In fact, within an expansion around four dimensions extrapolated to three dimensions, this does indeed happen for the isotropic system, and the Abrikosov fixed point is removed through precisely this mechanism Herbut and Janssen (2014). The system is left with a runaway flow towards an ordered nematic state Janssen and Herbut (2015, 2016).
In this work we extend the analysis of the influence of shortrange interactions on Abrikosov’s scenario by incorporating the effect of spatial anisotropy of the band structure at the QBT point. In fact, most real materials are not fully rotationally symmetric, but rather feature only cubic rotation invariance – even in the lowenergy description encoded in the Luttinger Hamiltonian. Whereas Abrikosov points out that a stable fixed point can only be isotropic Abrikosov (1974), Savary, Moon, and Balents Savary et al. (2014) find a stable quantum critical point towards AIAO order at (maximally) strong anisotropy within a controlled expansion. Here we investigate within the expansion whether (i) anisotropy can lead to a stable NFL fixed point in three dimension, and (ii) whether it can yield further unstable directions, such as towards the AIAO state. A key finding is that the RG flow of the anisotropy parameter is negligibly slow so that the anisotropy can simply be considered constant for all practical purposes; i. e. an approximately marginal coupling. Within this approximation both (i) and (ii) will be found to be answered in the affirmative.
This work is organized as follows. In Sec. II we introduce the field theoretic framework describing the anisotropic Luttinger semimetal together with the RG flow of the anisotropy parameter and Abrikosov’s NFL scenario. In Sec. III we study the RG fixed point structure and influence of shortrange interactions in the anisotropic system. We close with a discussion of our results in Sec. IV. Extensive appendices are devoted to deriving the full set of RG equations (A), constructing irreducible spin tensors (B), Fierz identities (C), and computing the functions used throughout the text (D).
Ii Field theoretic framework
ii.1 Lagrangian
The physics of threedimensional Luttinger fermions with longrange Coulomb repulsion is captured by the Lagrangian
(1) 
where is a fourcomponent Grassmann field, is the real electrostatic photon field, denotes imaginary time, is electric charge, and is the Luttinger Hamiltonian Luttinger (1956). The chemical potential is tuned to be at . We assume timereversal invariance at the singleparticle level, no external magnetic field shall be applied. Under these conditions, each of the two bands touching quadratically is doubly degenerate, and Luttinger showed that the most general singleparticle Hamiltonian is given by
(2) 
with Luttinger parameters , effective electron mass , and momentum operator . The matrices represent the spin3/2 angular momentum operators. We set in the following. We have written the Lagrangian (1) in a manner such that the dynamic critical exponent at the noninteracting Gaussian fixed point. Further, denotes the unit matrix.
The Luttinger Hamiltonian can be written in the computationally more advantageous form Murakami et al. (2004); Moon et al. (2013); Herbut and Janssen (2014); Boettcher and Herbut (2016)
(3) 
with five Hermitean matrices satisfying the Clifford algebra,
(4) 
the functions being given by , , , , , and we have and . We define the matrices below in a more general context. The functions constitute the real spherical harmonics on a sphere of radius .
For the field theoretic treatment we rescale the Hamiltonian by , normalize the field such that , and introduce the particlehole asymmetry and anisotropy parameters, and , via
(5) 
In the following we set , corresponding to particlehole symmetry, which will be shown to emerge dynamically during the renormalization group flow. With the normalization in Eq. (5), the parameter lies within the real interval . We eventually arrive at
(6) 
Squaring the Hamiltonian yields
(7) 
due to and . The roots of this expression determine the doubly degenerate spectrum of the Hamiltonian. We observe the spectrum to be rotation symmetric (a function of alone) only for .
The latter observation is a key element of this work. Under a spatial rotation of coordinates with , , the operators and transform as vectors, i.e., in the same manner as . Obviously, the first line in Eq. (2) is rotation invariant. The same is true for the first line in the representation of Eq. (3) – although less obviously so at this point. It will become apparent once we define the matrices as components of the second rank tensor below: the term is then seen to be proportional to , which is clearly rotation invariant.
Rotation invariance of the Hamiltonian is broken for . However, rotations with certain fixed angles still leave the expression invariant, namely those which rotate the individual coordinate axes onto each other. Roughly, those transformations permute the coordinate labels . If this symmetry is present we say that the system has cubic symmetry. The Luttinger Hamiltonian exhausts all cubic invariant terms to order , so that three Luttinger parameters suffice to parametrize a quadratic band touching point. The full rotation and cubic rotation groups are and , respectively.
ii.2 RG flow of the anisotropy
Performing the usual Wilson’s integration of the fermionic modes within the momentum shell and with all frequencies, we derive a flow equation for the anisotropy parameter from the renormalization of the fermion selfenergy. The computation is presented in detail in App. A. For this, angular integrations are performed in three dimensions, but the qualitative results remain invariant when performing the angular integration in four dimensions, which constitutes the upper critical dimension.
The RG flow equations presented in this work are valid for arbitrary values of . Except for some special values, such as , the function can only be determined numerically. To make them more accessible, however, we introduce functions with the following properties: We have for , and for general , is nonzero, positive, and of order unity. In this way, the qualitative and mostly quantitative aspects of the RG flow can be understood by setting
(8) 
in the functions. The functions are computed in App. D and shown in Fig. 8.
The RG flow for the anisotropy parameter to leading order in reads
(9) 
Since , we immediately discern three fixed points at . The coefficient multiplying , however, is exceptionally small. Close to the attractive fixed point , for example, the linearized flow reads
(10) 
This signals an extremely slow flow towards the fixed point. In fact, the entire prefactor multiplying in Eq. (9) remains below in magnitude for all values of , see Fig. 1. Consequently, the parameter can approximately be considered to be marginal  in contrast to a running coupling.
ii.3 Abrikosov’s NFL fixed point
The loop corrections to the fermion selfenergy determine the RG flow of the couplings and , the fermion anomalous dimension , and the dynamic critical exponent . The photon selfenergy leads to a renormalization of the charge . The diagrammatic oneloop contributions to the fermion and photon selfenergies are displayed in Fig. 2. The flow of has been discussed in the previous section. It is easy to see (App. A) that the coupling , which is marginal at the Gaussian fixed point, only receives corrections according to
(11) 
At an interacting fixed point with the coupling is then attracted towards . This justifies setting in Eq. (6). In contrast to Eq. (10), is not exceptionally small so that a nonzero diminishes quickly.
The existence of a nontrivial fixed point close to dimensions with anomalous fermion scaling and charge renormalization for a threedimensional quadratic band touching system has first been pointed out by Abrikosov Abrikosov (1974). This approach to an NFL is ingenious in its simplicity, as it basically relies on the “chirality” of the band dispersion, i.e. the presence of positive and negative eigenenergies (which implies and ), and the frequency independence of the photon propagator (which implies .) This has to be contrasted with an otherwise similar system of ultracold atoms at resonance with , where the lower band is missing, and the dimer propagator is Galilean invariant, implying anomalous boson scaling, but and Diehl and Wetterich (2006); Nikolić and Sachdev (2007); Boettcher et al. (2014). Abrikosov further points out that a stable fixed point of can only be at , and thus sets . As we have seen above, this statement is true, but it is still reasonable to consider the modifications of the Abrikosov NFL fixed point when taking into account a nonzero value of .
The fermion anomalous dimension is given by
(12) 
Close to it reads
(13) 
The numerical coefficient should be compared with the one in Eq. (10). Equations (10) and (13) are consistent with the results of Ref. Boettcher and Herbut (2016), which have been obtained in a perturbative expansion in . The comparison is facilitated by setting in the reference, and adjusting some couplings and prefactors, which leads to identical loop contributions to obtain the fermion selfenergy. The dynamic critical exponent is given by
(14) 
The flow equation for the charge is then given by
(15) 
The function is bounded from below by . We find the Abrikosov fixed point of the charge for small to be
(16) 
Again, is positive and of order unity for all , with . We thus conclude that the Abrikosov fixed point persists for all values of . However, as , the fixed point becomes weakly coupled. This behavior is visualized in Fig. 3.
The presence of the prefactor in the fixed point charge renders the problem perturbative for strong anisotropy, even when working with . A similar observation has been made in Ref. Savary et al. (2014) at the anisotropic fixed point with . In contrast to the expansion applied here, the fixed point in the reference is controlled by a expansion in three dimensions. The findings of the two investigations differ in that we do not find the anisotropic fixed point to be stable. This will be discussed further in Sec. IV.
Iii Shortrange interactions
We restrict the discussion of shortrange interactions to those that can be expressed in terms of local fourfermion terms. Every such term can be written as a contribution
(17) 
to the Lagrangian, with coupling and some matrices , where is the set of complex Hermitean matrices. In particular, even the terms of the form can be brought into the form of Eq. (17) by a Fierz transformation Boettcher and Herbut (2016).
In order to cover all possible terms of the form (17), it is sufficient to restrict to contributions , where is an basis of . Furthermore, rotation or cubic symmetry impose severe constraints on the possible values of . One possible choice of basis consists in with
(18) 
where , , and we require . (There are ten such matrices.) This choice is particularly convenient due to the computational simplifications arising from the Clifford algebra. However, the matrices do not have definite transformation properties under rotations of the cubic symmetry group. For our purposes it is convenient to introduce a basis which is manifestly cubic invariant. We denote it by
(19) 
with and . Note that, indeed, both and consist of 16 elements each.
In this section we first construct irreducible spin tensors to derive the basis , then study the fixed point structure of the RG flow including these couplings, and eventually investigate the instabilities associated with these fixed points (expressed through a divergent susceptibility at the transition).
iii.1 Irreducible spin tensors
To obtain the basis (19) we construct all possible operators that transform as tensors under SO(3). For this let be a rotation matrix, . We define a tensor of rank as any object labelled by indices that transforms as
(20) 
under a change of coordinates . In particular, we will be interested in the case that is a matrix. Recall that the rank of a tensor can be reduced by one or two units, respectively, by contracting it with or according to
(21)  
(22) 
If such a contraction yields zero we say that the tensor is irreducible. From Eqs. (21) and (22) it is then clear that irreducible tensors are precisely the symmetric and traceless tensors Hess (2015). Here, we say that a tensor is traceless if all its partial traces yield zero, i.e., it vanishes whenever two indices are contracted.
In order to construct the basis with definite transformation properties under rotations we apply the following recipe: The spin matrices transform as a vector under , and the product transforms as a tensor of rank . The corresponding irreducible tensors of rank can be computed from these products through symmetrization and the subtraction of suitable traces. One may wonder whether this procedure yields irreducible tensors of arbitrary rank. However, by means of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem it is easy to show that there are no irreducible spin tensors with rank , see App. B.3. Hence, in our case, we obtain irreducible tensors of rank , which can be used to build the basis introduced above.
Due to the noncommutativity of the spin matrices, , products of the type are not symmetric. We define the symmetrized rank tensors
(23)  
(24) 
Next, irreducible tensors , are constructed from the quantities with overbar by subtracting the partial traces such that . With a suitable ansatz and by making use of we arrive at
(25)  
(26) 
These are the irreducible spin tensors of rank for spin .
In App. B we show in detail that the irreducible tensors and can be expressed as
(27)  
(28) 
with , , and orthogonal basis tensors and . Since the spin tensors are matrixvalued, the components and are matrices as well. The desired basis in Eq. (19) is now constructed from the 1+3+5+7=16 elements , , , and after a proper normalization to satisfy
(29) 
We define
(30)  
(31)  
(32) 
In particular, the five components of the second rank tensor are the matrices introduced in the context of the Luttinger Hamiltonian in Eq. (3). We explicitly have
(33)  
(34)  
(35)  
(36)  
(37) 
Note that since is purely imaginary, the matrices are real, whereas are imaginary. The seven components of the thirdrank tensor are given by
(38)  
(39)  
(40)  
(41)  
(42)  
(43)  
(44) 
The operators and are even under timereversal transformations Boettcher and Herbut (2016), whereas and are odd. All operators feature inversion invariance. A nonzero expectation value of , , and corresponds to a nonzero density, magnetization, and nematic order, respectively. The order parameter constitutes a tensorial magnetization that does not point in a particular direction. We therefore suggest to refer to it as “nemagnetic order”. These observations are summarized in Table 1.
order  rank  #  cubic case  


0  1  +  +  

1  3  +  

2  5  +  + 



3  7  + 

iii.2 Local fourfermion couplings
The most general local fourfermion interaction term in the rotation (), inversion, and timereversal invariant case is given by
(45) 
The individual terms transform as scalar, vector, second and thirdrank tensors under , respectively. For the latter two this becomes particularly transparent when writing and . There are two Fierz identities
(46) 
which reveal that the expression (45) contains a certain degree of redundancy that can be removed by eliminating two of the terms. Due to Eq. (46), one of them needs to be either or . Here we choose to eliminate both of them and thus arrive at the Fierz complete interaction term
(47) 
Together with the Lagrangian from Eq. (1) this constitutes the field theoretic setup considered in Ref. Herbut and Janssen (2014).
To study the cubic symmetric case we introduce
(48) 
The most general cubic, inversion, and timereversal symmetric local fourfermion term is given by
(49) 
with
(50)  
(51)  
(52)  
(53)  
(54)  
(55)  
(56) 
and
(57) 
Each of the terms transforms as a singlet under the action of the cubic group. There are also five Fierz identities among the (App. C), allowing us to eliminate five couplings. We are thus left with three independent couplings, which we choose to be . Hence
(58) 
constitutes a Fierz complete interaction term. For it reduces to the expression in Eq. (47). The shortrange interaction terms can also be evoked for the study of other systems with fourcomponent fermions, for instance having linear dispersion, such as Weyl semimetals Maciejko and Nandkishore (2014) or quantum critical antiperovskites Isobe and Fu (2015, 2016).
Apart from the eight fermionic vertices that appear in Eq. (49) one may wonder whether the combinations , , , , and can also be generated during the RG flow. This, however, is forbidden by cubic and timereversal symmetry (), as can be seen as follows: Since is even under , but , , and are odd, the terms explicitly break . Due to the original Lagrangian in Eq. (1) being timereversal symmetric, no such term can be generated during the RG flow. The terms are forbidden by cubic symmetry. For this consider a rotation around the zaxis by . The coordinate vector transforms as . In the same way, and transform as and , respectively. Accordingly, the term is both timereversal and cubic symmetric, and indeed emerges in the present RG analysis. On the other hand, transforms under the same rotation as , so that . Again, since the original Lagrangian is cubic symmetric, the term cannot be generated during the RG evolution.
In the isotropic case, the four fermionic vertices appearing in Eq. (45) are chosen such that they have distinct transformation properties under . Accordingly, no mixing between these terms is possible due to symmetry. This changes in the cubic invariant case, where we observe the term in Eq. (57) to couple and . In fact, for the tensors and have exactly the same symmetries and are thus physically equivalent. Furthermore, every orthogonal pair of linear combinations of and may also be chosen for a basis. Here we define
(59)  
(60) 
In Ref. Isobe and Fu (2016) these tensors are labelled and , respectively. As further pointed out in the latter reference, the satisfy the threedimensional Clifford algebra
(61) 
They are also generators of an algebra. Due to this extra symmetry, the linear combination is distinguished for . The second linear combination, , then follows as the orthogonal partner, but does not possess any further symmetries. Note that in terms of the original we have
(62)  
(63) 
The pseudospin variable introduced in Eq. (10) of Ref. Savary et al. (2014) coincides with up to a prefactor. Further note that in the parametrization of Ref. Murray et al. (2015), where the magnetic channel is written as , corresponds to , which unfortunately falls outside the range considered in the reference.
The Luttinger semimetal considered in this work may be understood as the lowenergy effective field theory describing itinerant electrons on a pyrochlore lattice such as in Pyrochlore Iridates. The nemagnetic orders and can then be associated to particular orders of the local magnetic moments of electrons on the four corners of the tetrahedra forming the pyrochlore lattice. As shown in Ref. Goswami et al. (2017), a nonzero expectation value of or one component of corresponds to an allinallout (AIAO) or spin ice (SI) ordering, respectively. (The reference uses the notation and .) The correspondence is facilitated by observing that
(64)  
(65) 
from Eqs. (280) and (211). For this reason we will refer to the tensor orders corresponding to and as AIAO and SI ordering, although, of course, these notions only make sense on the pyrochlore lattice.
iii.3 Renormalization group flow
During the RG flow, shortrange interactions are generated from longrange interactions by the diagram to the left in Fig. 4. More explicitly, we have a nonvanishing term proportional to in Eqs. (68) and (69) below for the flow of and . This generates and , and they eventually also generate . Once the are present, they couple via the remaining two diagrams in the figure, and thereby lead to a sufficiently rich fixed point structure of the flow.
The flow equations for the couplings are given by
(66) 
with as in Eqs. (12) and (14) and
(67)  
(68)  
(69) 
The anisotropy parameter enters through the functions and . We define the latter by
(70)  
(71) 
We have for and
(72) 
for all . In particular, this implies
(73) 
in the limits of strong anisotropy, since obviously from the very definition.
The flow of the couplings is supplemented by the flow equation for given in Eq. (15), namely
(74) 
Since the flow equation for is not altered by the shortrange interactions, any possible fixed point in the space of couplings necessarily has either or with from Eq. (16). Note that the functions (67)(69) depend on and only through the combination . In App. A we show that this behavior results from the fact that the frequency integral of the squared fermion propagator vanishes.
In the isotropic limit ( and ) we recover the flow equations of Ref. Herbut and Janssen (2014) given by
(75) 
Here we use a different convention for defining the renormalized couplings and than in the reference, see the comment below Eq. (95) for a mapping. The flow equations (75) only support the Abrikosov fixed point for . In dimensions it annihilates with a quantum critical point, and consequently is absent for lower dimensions.
As the anisotropy is varied within the interval , various new fixed points in the space appear as solutions of the RG flow equations. These fixed points typically have several relevant directions and their impact on the phase structure will be discussed below. In order to uniquely identify the Abrikosov fixed point in this zoo of fixed points we define it as the one having only irrelevant directions. (In the fourdimensional coupling space this corresponds to four negative eigenvalues of the stability matrix at the fixed point.) The fixed point defined in this manner indeed satisfies