Double Peak Searches for (Pseudo-)Scalar Resonances at the LHC

Double Peak Searches for (Pseudo-)Scalar Resonances at the LHC

Abstract

Many new physics models contain a neutral scalar resonance that can be predominantly produced via gluon fusion through loops. In such a case, there could be important effects of additional particles, that in turn may hadronize before decaying and form bound states. This interesting possibility may lead to novel signatures with double peaks that can be searched for at the LHC. We study the phenomenology of double peak searches in diboson final states from loop induced production and decay of a new neutral spin-0 resonance at the LHC. The loop-induced couplings should be mediated by particles carrying color and electroweak charge that after forming bound states will induce a second peak in the diboson invariant mass spectrum near twice their mass. A second peak could be present via loop-induced couplings into (dijet), and final states as well as in the and channels for the case of a pseudo-scalar resonance or for scalars with suppressed tree-level coupling to gauge bosons.

EFI-16-14, NSF-KITP-16-089, WSU-HEP-1602

I Introduction

Diboson resonance searches have enjoyed renewed attention in the first years of the LHC. At Run 1, the diphoton channel played a central role in cementing the position of the newly discovered Higgs boson (1); (2). Furthermore, ongoing searches for TeV-scale resonances decaying into and bosons are fundamental to understanding the role of the Higgs in unitarizing vector boson scattering. The LHC experiments observed small excesses in diboson searches at an invariant mass of about 1.8-2 TeV (3); (4) which became less significant with the inclusion of Run 2 data (5); (6). A heavy diboson resonance can have many different origins, and observing the relative signal strengths in different diboson channels can help discriminate between candidate models of physics at the TeV scale.

For instance, composite Higgs models often predict resonances in diboson channels involving the , gauge bosons and the SM Higgs . By contrast, if a resonance is first observed in the diphoton channel, the natural explanation is associated with a new neutral spin-0 resonance, which is resonantly produced through gluon fusion, and decays into two photons (see, for example, Refs. (7); (8); (9); (10); (11) and references therein for recent studies of scalars decaying to photons). A sizable diboson rate demands a large decay branching ratio of the new (pseudo-)scalar to a pair of bosons, and therefore, its tree-level couplings to Standard Model (SM) fermions must be somewhat suppressed. In the case of a resonance appearing first in , new particles that carry color and electric charge are expected to be present, in order to mediate the loop-induced couplings of the new heavy (pseudo-)scalar to SM gauge bosons.

In this work, we concentrate on the possible appearance of two peaks, associated with a new neutral spin-0 resonance with negligible couplings to SM fermions. We shall assume the presence of loop-induced couplings of the new spin-0 resonance to gluons and electroweak gauge bosons, mediated by new colored and charged particles. Gluon fusion production yields a resonant peak at the spin-0 resonance mass in all possible diboson channels. The relative strength of the resonant peak in different diboson channels depends on the quantum numbers of the loop particles. We demonstrate the potential existence of two peaks, rather than one, in the diboson invariant mass spectrum, focusing on the signature. The double peak signature would indicate that the loop particles that contribute to the production and decay processes hadronize before decaying, forming new QCD bound states slightly below the pair production threshold.1 Such a bound state would then give rise to a second peak in the diboson invariant mass spectrum, in addition to the resonance due to the production and decay of the new (pseudo-)scalar. Moreover, the loop particles are expected to have a mass that is larger than half the mass of the neutral spin-0 resonance, in order to avoid tree-level decays of the neutral (pseudo-)scalar into the loop particles. In this case, the second peak would show up at an invariant mass that is larger than the mass of the neutral spin-0 resonance.

The conditions for the presence of two peaks are therefore 1) loop-induced couplings of the neutral (pseudo-)scalar with SM gauge bosons and 2) the loop-induced couplings are mediated by particles which form bound states. The first condition is satisfied for any neutral (pseudo-)scalar coupling to massless gauge bosons. For massive gauge bosons such as and bosons, the couplings to a pseudo-scalar boson are also loop-induced. To fulfill the second condition, the loop particles should have a decay width that is smaller than the QCD hadronization scale. Our considerations apply to any model containing a heavy neutral (pseudo-)scalar coupling to gluons and electroweak gauge bosons via new colored and charged particles in the loop. Therefore, the results shown here may have implications for future searches of new physics in diboson channels at the LHC.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: in Sec. II, we concentrate on final states containing two photons, and calculate the diphoton production cross section associated with the bound state of the new colored particles. The production cross section of other gauge boson channels may be obtained from the diphoton one by simple group theoretical factors associated with the quantum numbers of the loop particles (9). In Sec. III, we discuss the phenomenology of the new colored particles. We reserve Sec. IV for a discussion of our scenario and our conclusions.

Ii The bound state peak

We shall assume the existence of a neutral pseudo-scalar , which couples to gluons and electroweak gauge bosons via loops of new vector-like quarks (VLQ) , and that the width of is dominated by the resulting loop-induced decays. We also assume that the VLQs hadronize before they decay, so that a quarkonium state is formed. Let us denote the relevant Yukawa coupling ,

(1)

Furthermore, we will assume that there are degenerate copies of , each with electric charge transforming in a given color representation of dimension .

Then, assuming so that mixing effects between and the bound states can be neglected, the following properties hold:

(2)

where is the quadratic Casimir of . Similarly,

(3)

The total width is naturally dominated by and, therefore,

(4)

Under the above conditions,

(5)

and the diphoton invariant mass spectrum exhibits a resonant peak at .

On the other hand, the second peak is induced by the quarkonium bound state and the strength is proportional to (14)

(6)

which gives rise to a peak in the diphoton spectrum at . We see then that the strength of the peak at relative to the one at is governed by and depends on the color representation of , but is independent of the electric charge or multiplicity of  2.

Figure 1: Examples of a bound state peak accompanying a 1 TeV pseudoscalar resonance in the diphoton invariant mass spectrum with 50 fb of integrated luminosity at 13 TeV. An 800 GeV charge 5/3 VLQ is assumed, leading to a bound state peak (blue) near  TeV. The signal strength of the pseudoscalar resonance is fixed by its Yukawa coupling to the VLQ, which is 0.3 (0.1) in the magenta solid (dashed) curve. We assume a 1% resolution on each peak. The red curve represents an estimate of the diphoton background, scaled from LHC data (15).

As an illustration of the above relations, in Fig. 1 we present examples of two peaks in the diphoton invariant mass spectrum assuming a luminosity of 50 fb, where the first peak is chosen to be at 1 TeV. We choose a single charge 5/3 weak singlet VLQ with  GeV and . The signal strength of the peaks induced by the quarkonia bound states were computed using the Coulomb potential approximation (16). For , we expect to see the diphoton signal from the resonance first while for , we expect the diphoton signal from the bound state to first reach a sizable significance. Eventually with more data, two peaks would be seen in both cases.

In Fig. 2 we show the diphoton cross section for the bound state and the resonance. In the top panel, we show the cross section associated with the formation of quarkonium bound states at for a weak singlet VLQ with charge 5/3. The bottom curve of the band corresponds to . The top curve results from the choice , or alternatively with a bound state wave function at the origin that is 2 times larger than the value obtained using the Coulomb potential approximation, as suggested by a recent lattice calculation (17). We also show the present bounds on the diphoton cross section from ATLAS (18) and CMS (19), obtained at 13 TeV with an integrated luminosity of 15.4 fb and 12.9 fb, respectively. Bound states of VLQs with masses up to  GeV are already excluded. In the bottom panel, we show the diphoton cross section from a resonance assuming the existence of a single charge 5/3 weak singlet VLQ, with mass chosen to be 1 TeV and Yukawa couplings  (solid, magenta line) and  (dashed, red line). As can be seen from this panel, Yukawa coupling values between about  and  are currently probed by the LHC, with smaller Yukawa couplings generically probed for smaller values of the resonance mass.

Regarding the future LHC sensitivity, scaling the ATLAS diphoton background fit (15) to higher integrated luminosity, we estimate that the LHC with 300 fb of data will be able to probe bound states from a single (3, 1, 5/3) VLQ with a mass lower than roughly 1030 GeV, which is very close to the mass assumed in our benchmark scenario. This implies that for this value of the VLQ mass the LHC is already probing Yukawa couplings in the –1 range. Values of the Yukawa couplings a factor of about 2.5 smaller than the currently probed ones will be probed at these higher luminosities. These are the minimal values that could be probed in the absence of an LHC diphoton peak (larger values of would still be allowed for larger values of the VLQ mass). Let us stress that although we have taken the example of a single (3,1,5/3) VLQ, it is straightforward to use similar methods to compute the bounds on the mass and couplings for other values of the VLQ’ charge, representations and multiplicities, as the ones shown in Table 1.

Figure 2: Top panel: Diphoton signals from , QCD bound states of VLQs, at 13 TeV as a function of the lowest bound state mass for the representation (3,1,5/3). The signal strength is computed from the Coulomb potential calculations in Ref. (14). The lower curve of the orange band corresponds to choosing , while the top curve corresponds to . Bottom panel: Diphoton resonant cross section at 13 TeV from production through a loop of VLQ in the representation (3,1,5/3) with mass 1 TeV, as a function of the resonance mass, for (magenta, solid line) and (red, dashed line). The gray (blue) curve in both panels is the current diphoton cross section limit from ATLAS (CMS).

Iii Phenomenological constraints

The prediction of two peaks in the diphoton invariant mass spectrum applies to a wide class of models. Using a sample 1 TeV spin-0 resonance as a benchmark, in Table 1 we summarize possible new VLQs that could explain a potential signal, assuming a production cross section 0.4 fb, which is somewhat below the current bound on the cross section for this resonance mass and consistent with results obtained for in Fig 1. We show results for both pseudoscalar and scalar resonances3. Observe that is approximately the same for certain doublet and singlet cases, since the main contribution to the diphoton rate comes from the particle in the multiplet with the largest electric charge.

, pseudoscalar , scalar
(3,1,5/3) 0.3 0.5
(3,1,4/3) 0.5 0.8
(3,2,7/6) 0.3 0.4
(3,2,5/6) 0.5 0.7
(3,1,2/3) 2.0 3.0
(3,2,1/6) 1.6 2.4
Table 1: Possible loop VLQs that can produce a 0.4 fb diphoton signal at 1 TeV, which is somewhat below the current cross section bound and consistent with results obtained for in Fig 1. The VLQ mass is assumed to be 800 GeV. In the second column, the vector-like fermions are assumed to couple to a pseudoscalar resonance, while in the third column, the resonance is a scalar. The diphoton signal rate depends on the product of and hence the value of can be scaled to integer values by choosing different values of .

Since quarkonia states would only develop if the loop particles hadronize before decaying, it is relevant to discuss the possible decays of these particles. Among the VLQ quantum numbers listed in Table 1, all but the and cases may decay into Standard Model particles, via Yukawa couplings that mix these exotic states with SM states. The values of these Yukawa couplings should be chosen so that the new colored particles hadronize before decaying, something that naturally occurs for Yukawa couplings smaller than about a few times . Limits on the mass of the VLQs depend on the decay branching fraction into various final states4 and are typically GeV for decays to SM quarks and vector bosons (23); (24); (25). For multiple copies of the VLQs, as may be required for some of the representations in Table 1, these bounds will be even stronger.

The colored particles also hadronize before decaying when they lie in compressed spectra, e.g. as motivated by coannihilation scenarios where the colored particles are expected to be only slightly heavier than some new dark matter state (26). For instance, one can add a new scalar and impose a new parity at the TeV scale under which the SM is even and all new particles are odd. Such a new parity has several advantages and distinct collider phenomenology (27); (28), similar to cases in which possible modifications of the SM Higgs diphoton rate were studied (29); (30). Since has the same quantum numbers as the Higgs field, again a Yukawa coupling between , and a SM quark is possible for all but the and states. This new Yukawa coupling leads to the decay

(7)

where is expected to be the lightest odd particle and therefore can be a dark matter candidate. Then, for sufficiently heavy , the decay products will have soft kinematic spectra. Consequently, pair production above threshold will not be subject to the existing strong bounds on particles decaying to SM quarks and vector gauge bosons. In the limit that and are very close in mass, coannihilation with may help to set the proper relic density of and provide a natural motivation for the long lifetime.

On the other hand, for the exotic singlet VLQs in SM representations and , there is no renormalizable, gauge invariant operator to mediate their decays into (or SM particles). Additional particle content is thus required. As an example, when the loop particle is in the representation, one could consider the existence of an additional isospin doublet VLQ in the representation. All new particles, , and are odd under the new parity. If and the Yukawas of the and are similar, the extra VLQ does not contribute appreciably to the diphoton spectrum. Then, with the Lagrangian

(8)

decays proceed through off-shell ,

(9)

Once again, the decay products of will be soft if is sufficiently heavy, implying weaker collider bounds and therefore allowing lower VLQ masses. Similar considerations apply to the case in which the loop particle is in the representation, with the only difference being that should be in the representation. The lifetime of the exotic singlet VLQs is naturally large, ensuring that these VLQs hadronize before decaying, leading to the formation of bound states.

The addition of the new VLQs in Table 1 to the SM modifies the renormalization group evolution of the gauge couplings and one can inquire about the perturbative consistency of the theory. For , among the possibilities in Table 1, all but the exotic singlet VLQs have been studied in Ref. (31) and the perturbativity of the theory is maintained up to very high energy scales. We checked that this remains the case for the exotic singlet VLQs. However, if extra fermions were included to induce the VLQs’ decays, as in Eq. (8), the hypercharge gauge coupling would become non-perturbative at scales of the order of  GeV, demanding the appearance of new physics below that energy scale.

Iv Conclusions

In this work we consider a wide class of models containing a neutral (pseudo-)scalar coupling to gluons and electroweak gauge bosons via loop-induced couplings of new particles carrying color and electroweak charges. We showed that, if the new loop particles hadronize before decaying, there will be a second peak in the diboson invariant mass spectrum at around twice the mass of the new loop particles. This additional peak is generically at a larger mass than the peak due to the resonant production of the neutral (pseudo-)scalar. This new peak, on the other hand, is due to the new colored particles forming QCD bound states, which subsequently decay back into gauge boson pairs.

The existence of a second peak is quite generic for a heavy diboson resonance arising from a new neutral spin-0 resonance produced in the gluon fusion channel. The only requirement is that the new colored particle has a decay width that is smaller than the QCD hadronization scale. The signal from resonant (pseudo-)scalar production and the bound state peak are not restricted to the final state that we have considered in this work, but are generically expected to appear in the , and channels as well. If the loop particle is charged under , a signature is also possible. While searches involving photons and leptonically decaying bosons tend to be the cleanest experimentally, ultimately the relative strengths of these channels depend on the particular gauge quantum numbers of the loop particle. These quantum numbers affect the decays of both the bound state and the resonance simultaneously, and conseequently an interesting test of our hypothesis is that two diboson peaks are seen with proportional strengths across different channels.

In conclusion, any model that attempts to predict a diboson excess by means of loops of colored and electroweak charged particles should be subject to not only the constraints imposed by direct searches for these loop particles, but also to constraints coming from searches for new diboson peaks associated with the formation of bound states, if the loop particles hadronize before they decay. Indeed, the positions of the additional peaks could provide a better determination of the mass of the new particles than the one provided by direct searches.

Acknowledgements.
Fermilab is operated by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the U.S. Department of Energy. Work at University of Chicago is supported in part by U.S. Department of Energy grant number DE-FG02-13ER41958. Work at ANL is supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. P.H. is partially supported by U.S. Department of Energy Grant DE-FG02-04ER41286. A.I. thanks the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics for its hospitality, and is supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under grant DE-FG02-12ER41811 and the National Science Foundation under grant NSF PHY11-25915. I.L. is supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-SC0010143. N.R.S is supported in part by the Wayne State University Start-up package. C.W. would like to thank G. Bodwin, H.S. Chung, A. Joglekar and A. Katz for helpful discussions on this subject.

Footnotes

  1. If the new loop particles decay before hadronizing, there could still be a “shoulder” in the diboson invariant mass spectrum due the amplitude developing an imaginary part at the kinematic threshold, such as in the case of double Higgs production (12). Such a shoulder, however, may be too small to be observed for reasonable choices of parameters (13).
  2. If the loop induced couplings are generated by more than one colored particle, there may be multiple additional peaks and their strengths will depend on the particular lifetimes, multiplicities and quantum numbers of each of these particles.
  3. For -even resonances, loop scalars may be allowed in place of the VLQs, but for resonance couplings to a pair of scalars of about the scalar mass, the resonant cross section is significantly lower than in the VLQ case (20); (21); (22).
  4. For a scan over decay branching fractions, see “additional materials” in the weblink in Ref. (23).

References

  1. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 1–29, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex].
  2. CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 30–61, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex].
  3. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for high-mass diboson resonances with boson-tagged jets in proton-proton collisions at TeV with the ATLAS detector,” JHEP 12 (2015) 055, arXiv:1506.00962 [hep-ex].
  4. CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., “Search for massive resonances in dijet systems containing jets tagged as W or Z boson decays in pp collisions at = 8 TeV,” JHEP 08 (2014) 173, arXiv:1405.1994 [hep-ex].
  5. CMS Collaboration Collaboration, “Search for massive resonances decaying into pairs of boosted W and Z bosons at = 13 TeV,” Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-EXO-15-002, CERN, Geneva, 2015. http://cds.cern.ch/record/2117062.
  6. “Search for resonances with boson-tagged jets in 3.2 fb of p p collisions at = 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS detector,” Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2015-073, CERN, Geneva, Dec, 2015. http://cds.cern.ch/record/2114845.
  7. R. Franceschini, G. F. Giudice, J. F. Kamenik, M. McCullough, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, M. Redi, F. Riva, A. Strumia, and R. Torre, “What is the gamma gamma resonance at 750 GeV?,” arXiv:1512.04933 [hep-ph].
  8. J. Ellis, S. A. R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, V. Sanz, and T. You, “On the Interpretation of a Possible GeV Particle Decaying into ,” arXiv:1512.05327 [hep-ph].
  9. I. Low and J. Lykken, “Implications of Gauge Invariance on a Heavy Diphoton Resonance,” arXiv:1512.09089 [hep-ph].
  10. W. Altmannshofer, J. Galloway, S. Gori, A. L. Kagan, A. Martin, and J. Zupan, “On the 750 GeV di-photon excess,” arXiv:1512.07616 [hep-ph].
  11. A. Strumia, “Interpreting the 750 GeV digamma excess: a review,” 2016. arXiv:1605.09401 [hep-ph].
  12. S. Dawson, A. Ismail, and I. Low, “What’s in the loop? The anatomy of double Higgs production,” Phys. Rev. D91 no. 11, (2015) 115008, arXiv:1504.05596 [hep-ph].
  13. S. Jain, F. Margaroli, S. Moretti, and L. Panizzi, “The 750 GeV threshold to a new particle world,” arXiv:1605.08741 [hep-ph].
  14. Y. Kats and M. J. Strassler, “Probing Colored Particles with Photons, Leptons, and Jets,” JHEP 11 (2012) 097, arXiv:1204.1119 [hep-ph].
  15. ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for resonances decaying to photon pairs in 3.2 fb of collisions at = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,”.
  16. Y. Kats and M. J. Strassler, “Resonances from QCD bound states and the 750 GeV diphoton excess,” JHEP 05 (2016) 092, arXiv:1602.08819 [hep-ph].
  17. S. Kim, “Nonrelativistic lattice study of stoponium,” Phys. Rev. D92 no. 9, (2015) 094505, arXiv:1508.07080 [hep-lat].
  18. ATLAS Collaboration, T. A. collaboration, “Search for scalar diphoton resonances with 15.4 fb of data collected at =13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 with the ATLAS detector,”.
  19. CMS Collaboration, C. Collaboration, “Search for resonant production of high mass photon pairs using of proton-proton collisions at and combined interpretation of searches at 8 and 13 TeV,”.
  20. D. Choudhury and K. Ghosh, “The LHC Diphoton excess at 750 GeV in the framework of the Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model,” arXiv:1605.00013 [hep-ph].
  21. A. Djouadi and A. Pilaftsis, “The 750 GeV Diphoton Resonance in the MSSM,” arXiv:1605.01040 [hep-ph].
  22. G. T. Bodwin, H. S. Chung, and C. E. M. Wagner, “Higgs-Stoponium Mixing Near the Stop-Antistop Threshold,” arXiv:1609.04831 [hep-ph].
  23. CMS Collaboration Collaboration, “Search for vector-like quarks in final states with a single lepton and jets in pp collisions at TeV,” Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-B2G-12-017, CERN, Geneva, 2014. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsB2G12017#Additional_Material.
  24. CMS Collaboration Collaboration, “Search for pair production of vector-like T quarks in the lepton plus jets final state,” Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-B2G-16-002, CERN, Geneva, 2016.
  25. CMS Collaboration Collaboration, “Search for top quark partners with charge 5/3 at TeV,” Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-B2G-15-006, CERN, Geneva, 2016.
  26. K. Griest and D. Seckel, “Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances,” Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 3191–3203.
  27. H.-C. Cheng and I. Low, “TeV symmetry and the little hierarchy problem,” JHEP 09 (2003) 051, arXiv:hep-ph/0308199 [hep-ph].
  28. H.-C. Cheng, I. Low, and L.-T. Wang, “Top partners in little Higgs theories with T-parity,” Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 055001, arXiv:hep-ph/0510225 [hep-ph].
  29. A. Joglekar, P. Schwaller, and C. E. M. Wagner, “Dark Matter and Enhanced Higgs to Di-photon Rate from Vector-like Leptons,” JHEP 12 (2012) 064, arXiv:1207.4235 [hep-ph].
  30. N. Arkani-Hamed, K. Blum, R. T. D’Agnolo, and J. Fan, “2:1 for Naturalness at the LHC?,” JHEP 01 (2013) 149, arXiv:1207.4482 [hep-ph].
  31. K. J. Bae, M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, and T. Moroi, “Diphoton Excess and Running Couplings,” Phys. Lett. B757 (2016) 493–500, arXiv:1602.03653 [hep-ph].
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
157809
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description