A Photometric Variability Survey of M71

A Search for Photometric Variability Towards M71 with the Near-Infrared Transiting ExoplanetS Telescope

J. McCormac, I. Skillen, D. Pollacco, F. Faedi, G. Ramsay E-mail: jmcc@ing.iac.es    V. S. Dhillon, I. Todd, A. Gonzalez
Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Apartado de Correos 321, E-38700, Santa Cruz de la Palma, Spain
Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen’s University, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
Armagh Observatory, College Hill, Armagh BT61 9DG, UK
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, UK
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, 38205 La Laguna, Spain
Accepted 2013 December 17. Received 2013 December 13; in original form 2013 August 9
Abstract

We present the results of a high-cadence photometric survey of an field centred on the globular cluster M71, with the Near-Infrared Transiting ExoplanetS Telescope. The aim of our survey is to search for stellar variability and transiting giant exoplanets. This survey differs from previous photometric surveys of M71 in that it is more sensitive to lower amplitude ( mag) and longer period ( d) variability than previous work on this cluster. We have discovered new variable stars towards M71 and confirm the nature of previously known objects, for which the orbital periods of are refined or newly determined. Given the photometric precision of our high-cadence survey on the horizontal branch of M71, we confirm the cluster is devoid of RR Lyrae variable stars within the area surveyed. We present new and band photometry of the stars in our sample from which we estimate spectral types of the variable objects. We also search our survey data for transiting hot Jupiters and present simulations of the expected number of detections. Approximately stars were observed on the main-sequence of M71 with sufficient photometric accuracy to detect a transiting hot Jupiter, however none were found.

keywords:
globular clusters: individual (M71, NGC 6838) – instrumentation: photometers – planetary systems – stars: variables: general – techniques: photometric
pagerange: A Search for Photometric Variability Towards M71 with the Near-Infrared Transiting ExoplanetS TelescopeApubyear: 2013

1 Introduction

M71 (NGC 6838) is a sparsely populated, metal-rich Globular Cluster (GC), located at R.A. (J2000) 19534649, Dec. (J2000) +1846′451, at a distance of kpc from the Sun (Geffert & Maintz, 2000), in a crowded field not far from the galactic plane, and (Golsbury et al., 2000). The earliest modern work on variable stars in M71 was carried out by Sawyer (1953), who discovered bright variables in the region towards the cluster, one of which is the long-period semi-regular pulsating giant Z Sagittae and another the semi-detached Algol-type eclipsing binary QU Sge.

The first systematic photometric study of M71 was conducted by Arp & Hartwick (1971, hereafter AH71) with the goal of determining the age of the cluster and creating an accurate Colour-Magnitude Diagram (CMD). AH71 carried out photographic and photo-electric observations of M71, calculating the reddening, distance modulus and age of the system to be , and age Gyr, respectively. Cudworth (1985) conducted a cluster membership survey of over stars towards M71 with using proper motions.

In the early 1990s two photometric surveys were carried out in the central region of M71 by Hodder et al. (1992) and Yan & Mateo (1994), discovering and new variable stars, respectively. Hodder et al. (1992) concluded that one of the Blue Stragglers (BS) observed is a variable star (H1) of the SX Phoenicis (SX Phe) type. The second variable (H2) is possibly a field dwarf Cepheid ( Scuti) and the remaining two variables (H3 & H4) are possible eclipsing binaries. The goal of the survey by Yan & Mateo (1994) was to determine the primordial binary percentage in M71. Three of the variables they discovered are contact binaries (V1, V2 and V5), while the remaining two (V3 and V4) are detached or semi-detached eclipsing binaries.

Figure 1: Summary of the NITES survey observations. The red boxes show the number of images acquired per night. Observations on the nights of 2011 Jun 22 and 23, where significantly more images were acquired, were made with s exposure times. Observations on the other nights were made with s exposure times. The blue crosses show the minimum FWHM in arc seconds for each night. The minimum FWHM was constrained typically by the lack of fine focus control rather than poor seeing. The focuser on the NITES telescope has since been upgraded.

In the most recent survey for variable stars towards M71, Park & Nemec (2000) discovered a further faint variables with mean magnitudes between , of which are definite variables, probable and possible. As previous searches for variable stars in M71 were limited to small areas around the cluster centre, Park & Nemec primarily conducted their search in the outer regions (out to from the cluster centre). They identified possible new SX Phe-type stars (v9, v13, v16 and v22), two of which (v9 and v22) were discovered within of the cluster centre. The faint variables of Park & Nemec (2000) combined with the previously discovered by Hodder et al. (1992) and Yan & Mateo (1994) gave a total of known bright and faint variables towards M71 prior to our study.

Whilst the goal of these GC photometric surveys was the detection of variable stars, for more recent surveys the detection of exoplanets has been the prime objective (e.g. 47 Tuc - Gilliland et al. 2000, Weldrake et al. 2005 and Cen - Weldrake, Sackett & Bridges 2008), although no evidence has been found for an exoplanet orbiting a star in a GC and the hot Jupiter occurrence rate in GCs remains unknown.

Several transiting exoplanet surveys have also been conducted of younger (age 4 Gyr), more metal-rich () stars in Open Clusters (OCs), e.g. NGC 6819 (Street et al., 2003), NGC 6940 (Hood et al., 2005), NGC 7789 (Bramich et al., 2005), NGC 6791 (Mochejska et al., 2005), NGC 2158 (Mochejska et al., 2006), NGC 1245 (Burke et al., 2006), Praesepe (Pepper et al., 2008). None of these surveys found significant evidence of transiting exoplanets. Recently, Quinn et al. (2012) discovered the first two giant planets orbiting main-sequence stars in the young ( Myr) OC Praesepe using the radial velocity method, indicating that hot Jupiters do form and indeed survive in cluster environments.

Meibom et al. (2013) recently discovered the first two transiting exoplanets orbiting sun-like stars in a cluster environment using data from the Kepler spacecraft. The planets, Kepler-66b ( R, d) and Kepler-67b ( R, d) were discovered in the extremely old ( yr) OC NGC 6811 as part of the Kepler Cluster Survey (Meibom, 2011). Meibom et al. (2013) find no significant difference between the occurrence rates of Neptune sized planets inside and outside OCs. This strengthens the idea that such planets must be able to survive the high stellar densities and the violent deaths and high energy radiation of massive stars, to which they were inevitably subjected during the early stages of cluster evolution. However, we note that the results of Meibom et al. (2013) are based on low number statistics and that the hot Jupiter occurrence rate in OCs may still differ somewhat from that around field stars. Continued monitoring of many more OCs is required to place more stringent limits on the occurrence rates of exoplanets, of all sizes, in OCs.

Previous surveys in M71 targeted different regions of the cluster with varying levels of photometric accuracy. The survey presented here aims to discover new variable stars and possibly transiting exoplanets in M71. The relatively high metallicity (, Smolinski et al. 2011) and lower stellar density of M71 also make it a more favourable host for planetary systems in comparison to other metal-poor, densely packed GCs. M71 also contains more stars than a typical OC, and its apparent diameter () is matched well with the field of view (FOV) of the Near-Infrared Transiting ExoplanetS (NITES) telescope (, see §2) allowing the cluster to be imaged out to per cent of its tidal radius 111http://physwww.mcmaster.ca/harris/Databases.html (Harris, 1996) in a single pointing. With the NITES telescope we are able to search for lower amplitude, longer period variability than in previous surveys.

In §2 we introduce the NITES telescope, outline our observations of M71 and describe our data reduction processes. In §3 we describe our method of detecting stellar variability. In §4 we highlight our sensitivity to transiting hot Jupiters in M71 and present simulations of the expected number of detections. In §5 we summarise the results of our survey and comment on the apparent lack of RR Lyrae variables in M71. In §6 we estimate spectral types and discuss cluster membership probabilities for the variable stars in M71. Finally, we close with a summary in §7. In Appendix A we highlight the NITES telescope’s photometric performance, comparing it to a theoretical noise model of the system.

2 The Nites Telescope, Observations & Data Reduction

The NITES telescope is an m Meade LX200GPS Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope. The CCD camera is a Finger Lakes Instrumentation (FLI) Proline 4710 (hereafter PL4710) with a back illuminated , m pixel, deep-depleted CCD made by e2v222e2v model 47-10. The deep depletion CCD suppresses fringing, has a peak quantum efficiency of QE % around nm, and is sensitive out to micron (where QE %). The focal length of the telescope is mm which gives a FOV of , and a plate scale ″ pix, respectively. Using a Peltier cooler, PL4710 runs at °C; at this temperature dark current is noticeable at e pix s. PL4710 can be read out at pixel rates of or MHz with resulting gains and read noises of and e ADU, and and e, respectively. During our survey of M71 the telescope focus was controlled using a basic system supplied by Meade. The focuser had no absolute position encoder and gave poor focusing repeatability. It has since been upgraded to an FLI Precision Digital Focuser (PDF). The PDF contains an absolute stepper motor, encoded with steps and a step size of m, allowing for more repeatable focus control. The telescope is mounted on a custom wedge made by Maurice Walsh & Co., Ballynahinch, U.K. The wedge allows for more precise polar alignment over the traditional fixed pier system. The telescope and its control system are housed inside a ft Astrohaven clamshell dome which is located beside SuperWASP-North (Pollacco et al., 2006) at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos on La Palma. Weather information is taken from the SuperWASP meteorological system in real time. The NITES telescope utilises the DONUTS autoguiding algorithm (McCormac et al., 2013) which calculates guide corrections from the science images directly.

2.1 Photometry with the NITES Telescope

Figure 2: M71 RMS vs magnitude diagram from a typical night during the NITES survey (2011 August 04). The black points represent the unbinned data while the red points are from data binned into min bins. The horizontal dashed grey line shows the % accuracy level required to detect a R sized planet. The vertical dashed grey lines show the limiting magnitudes at the % level for the binned and unbinned data. The dashed blue line highlights the magnitude of the main-sequence turn off () in M71.

Remote observations of M71 using the NITES telescope began on 2011 June 17 and continued until 2011 August 29, exposure times of s were typically used. To increase the sensitivity of the survey, observations were made without a filter. In total the survey collected data over a d baseline with nights of observations, equating to h on sky, collecting images. To monitor the seeing and focus variations during each run and from night to night, the median FWHM of each frame was measured using SExtractor (Bertin & Arnouts, 1996). A summary of the observations is given in Fig. 1.

Data were reduced using standard routines in IRAF333IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.. The reduced data from the entire survey were then batch processed using the difference-imaging software DIAPL2 (Pych private communication). The software makes use of the method of Optimal Image Subtraction of Alard & Lupton (1998) and is an improved version of DIAPL (Wozniak, 2000). DIAPL2 allows for the creation of smaller image subsections which treat rapidly varying Point Spread Functions (PSFs) better.

DIAPL2 begins by measuring the average FWHM of all the images to be processed and ranks them in increasing order. The sharpest frames with the lowest background counts are ranked highest and are combined to create the template image of the field to which the others are compared. The highest ranked image is used as the geometric reference to which all other images are aligned. A total of images met our selection criteria of FWHM ( pixels) and sky background pixel, for template creation. Under-sampled images (FWHM pixels) were discarded. The template image was subsequently broken down into subsections to allow for better PSF fitting and subtraction. Each science image was then split into the same number of subsections and its template subtracted.

SExtractor was used to extract all the sources in the template image with peak flux per pixel within the linear region of the CCD ( e). Images taken at elevations were not used due to dome vignetting and those with focus drifts (median FWHM ) were also excluded from the analysis. Approximately % of the data were lost due to dome vignetting or focus drift. Aperture radii of , and pixels (, and ) were tested and a final aperture radius of pixels () was chosen as it gave the lowest RMS in the reduced light curves.

To estimate the band magnitude at peak brightness () of the stars observed with the NITES telescope, bright photometric standards from Table 1 of AH71 (A1, U, N, A7, A5, Y, X, L, A3, C and A2) were used to transform the white light photometric system to Johnson . As the survey was conducted in white light, no colour information was available making it impossible to convert precisely to Johnson . The method above simply acts as an estimation of the brightness on a magnitude scale.

Mid exposure times were converted to Heliocentric Julian Date (HJD) using the method of Eastman, Siverd & Gaudi (2010). The point-to-point photometric errors from DIAPL2 were systematically larger by a factor of compared with those from SExtractor. As the errors from SExtractor were closer to those expected from typical CCD noise (see Appendix A) they were preferred, and the errors from DIAPL2 were scaled using:

(1)

where is the corrected error for star at time , is the error from DIAPL2 for star at time , is the mean of the errors from DIAPL2 for star and is the error of star in the reference frame as measured by SExtractor.

2.2 Photometry with the Wide Field Camera

In order to obtain accurate colour information for all the stars surveyed by the NITES telescope we obtained and band images of M71 during photometric conditions using the Wide Field Camera (WFC) on the Isaac Newton Telescope on 2013 April 5. The observations in each filter were dithered by steps to cover the gaps between the WFC mosaiced CCDs. The WFC data were reduced using the data reduction package THELI (Erben et al., 2005), which bias subtracted and flat fielded each of the WFC’s CCDs independently.

As M71 is quite crowded, instrumental magnitudes were obtained using PSF fitting in DAOPHOT (Stetson, 1987). The PSF was modelled using bright and isolated stars spread over the FOV. Instrumental magnitudes for stars in the field were obtained and transformed to the standard system using the photometry of GM00. The transformation was carried out using:

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

where and are instrumental magnitudes, and are the atmospheric extinction coefficients, and are the average airmass of the mosaic WFC image in each band, and are the magnitudes of GM00 on the standard system, and are the atmospheric extinction-corrected instrumental magnitudes, and are the transformation coefficients, and are the zero points. As only a small range of airmass was sampled the extinction terms and were assumed to be and , respectively. These values were found by interpolating the results from the atmospheric extinction study of La Palma by D. L. King444http://www.ing.iac.es/Astronomy/observing/manuals/ps/
tech_notes/tn031.pdf
to the central wavelength of each filter ( Å and Å).

We calculated , , and for the transformations above. After the transformation we find a systematic offset of mag fainter for the WFC V magnitudes compared to those of GM00. After correcting the systematic offset the magnitudes presented here are found to be in excellent agreement with GM00.

3 Searching for Stellar Variability

We used a Lomb-Scargle (LS - Lomb 1976; Scargle 1982; Press & Rybicki 1989) periodogram to search for stellar variability with periods in the range d with frequency steps of d. For each periodogram, we estimated the power detection threshold corresponding to a false alarm probability (FAP) of 0.1%, according to the number of independent frequencies used (see Cumming, Marcy & Butler 1999). We tested our FAP performing extensive simulations on a set of synthetic light curves free from astrophysical periodic signals, modelled using real NITES light curves (time stamps, data gaps, data length). Because our data contain real periods at the and periods (mostly caused by our window function) we also used the CLEAN (Roberts, Lehar & Dreher, 1987) algorithm to confirm our period detection.

Additionally, light curves with significant (FAP 0.1%) periodicity from our LS analysis were analysed further using Phase Dispersion Minimisation (PDM - Stellingwerf 1978). The range of periods searched with PDM were restricted to % of the period detected by the LS and CLEAN analyses. It was found that PDM typically returned a better fitting period, especially in the case of non-sinusoidal variability. Variable stars displaying evidence of multiple periods were also analysed using a Fourier power spectrum in the PERIOD04 program (Lenz & Breger, 2005). Breger et al. (1993) and Kuschnig et al. (1997) show that for a significant detection a is required for a given peak in the power spectrum, hence we adopt the same criterion in our multifrequency analysis (see §5.3). A recent comparison of period fitting algorithms by Graham et al. (2013) showed that different types of variability in data of differing quality – both in terms of time sampling and noise characteristics – may have their periodicity more efficiently recovered by different algorithms. Here we choose to concentrate on periodic variability (stellar pulsations, eclipsing binaries as well as transiting exoplanets) and hence adopt the traditional algorithms, LS and PDM, and Box Least Squares (BLS, see §4.2) in the case of searching for transiting exoplanets. We note however, that these algorithms are not perfect; e.g. the well known half-period aliasing problem of eclipsing binaries when using an LS analysis.

The error on each period was calculated using a bootstrapping technique. A random number generator was used to randomly resample, with replacement, each unfolded light curve times, resulting in a series of light curves in which several data points may have been selected more than once and others not at all. PDM was run on this series of resampled light curves and the error on the period was taken as the standard deviation in the spread of periods measured in the resampled series. In the case of eclipsing binaries showing ellipsoidal variations and/or secondary eclipses, the strongest PDM period is often half the true orbital period. These light curves were easily identified by eye and their PDM period doubled.

4 Detectability of Transiting Hot Jupiters in M71

To detect the transit of a typical hot Jupiter requires photometric precision at the % level or better. Figure 2 shows a typical RMS vs magnitude diagram of M71 taken during dark time with the NITES telescope. The unbinned data from the night of 2011 August 04 (black points) are of insufficient accuracy around the main-sequence turn off (MSTO, ) to detect a transiting hot Jupiter. Figure 11 shows that the NITES telescope is essentially free from correlated noise, hence binning of our data points, as done by the BLS fitting algorithm (see §4.2) to increase our photometric accuracy is justified. The data from 2011 August 04 were subsequently binned tenfold into min bins and the RMS vs magnitude diagram was recreated (see Fig. 2 - red points). At this level of binning it is clear that our variability survey is sensitive to transiting hot Jupiters at the top of the MS in M71. Since our survey only samples the bright end of the MS in M71, our targets are those with the least photon noise which allows for easier transit detection.

4.1 Transiting Exoplanet Expectations

Figure 3: BLS detection efficiency per magnitude bin for a planet on a d orbit. Detections are only assumed real if (see §4.2).

In this section we describe the process of creating a series of simulated NITES light curves containing hot Jupiter-like transits of differing depths and durations. The goal is to simulate the possible transit signals we might detect in our survey data and determine our detection success rate using the transit detection algorithm described in §4.2. Given the hot Jupiter median radius and period ( and d, August 2013. See exoplanet encyclopedia555http://www.exoplanet.eu) we investigated our sensitivity in the case of a hot Jupiter with and a period of d.

We adopted the estimates for and as in 47 Tuc (see Bergbusch & VandenBerg 2001 and also Weldrake et al. 2005) for the simulations of exoplanet detectability presented here. Excluding the effects of limb darkening, the transit depth, and duration, , in hours for the simulated light curves can be estimated using:

(6)
(7)

where and in Eq 6 are the radii of the planet and star respectively, and and in Eq 7 are the mass and radius of the star in solar units and is the orbital period in days (Gilliland et al., 2000).

For a given magnitude each light curve was created with depth and duration from Table 1. The synthetic set spans the length of the survey with a time sampling of d, chosen in order to match the real NITES time sampling. The first mid-transit time for each individual light curve was randomly selected from the three days before our observing window. Gaussian noise was then added to individual light curves where the RMS is the limiting accuracy of the NITES survey in each mag bin (see Table 1).

The synthetic light curves were compared to the real times of observation during the survey and points which did not correspond to time on sky were excluded. As observations were carried out only when conditions were favourable no explicit simulations of weather and observing conditions were performed. The process was repeated times for each magnitude bin (see Table 1), resulting in simulated light curves with randomly occurring transits throughout. As can be seen in Table 1, the depths of any transits detectable by the NITES telescope are expected to range from mag.

V (mag) Transit Transit RMS N
Depth (mag) Duration (h) (mag)
17.50 0.01074 2.79 0.007 210
17.75 0.01369 2.48 0.009 255
18.00 0.01635 2.29 0.011 268
18.25 0.01942 2.12 0.013 189
18.50 0.02280 1.97 0.017 115
18.75 0.02617 1.86 0.022 36
19.00 0.02958 1.76 0.030 1
Table 1: Simulated light curve parameters calculated using Eqs 6 & 7 and the estimates of stellar mass and radius of Bergbusch & VandenBerg (2001). The final column is the number of stars in each magnitude bin of the NITES survey with RMS transit depth for a R planet.

The simulated light curves were analysed with the BLS algorithm explained in §4.2. The expected transit depth in each magnitude bin from Table 1 was used to separate stars suitable for transit searching from those with insufficient photometric accuracy. The final column in Table 1 gives the total number of stars per magnitude bin with photometric precision better than the corresponding depth of a R planet. A total of stars were observed on the MS of M71 down to with sufficient accuracy to discover a transiting hot Jupiter.

There are currently conflicting numbers regarding the hot Jupiter occurrence rate around Sun-like stars in the Solar neighbourhood. Wright et al. (2012) summarise the situation and show that the rate differs by up to a factor of depending on the source. Results from the Kepler (Howard et al., 2012) and OGLE-III (Gould et al., 2006) transit surveys (adjusted for all orbital geometries, transiting and non-transiting) disagree with those from the radial velocity (RV) surveys (Marcy et al., 2005; Cumming et al., 2008; Mayor et al., 2011; Wright et al., 2012) by a factor of . Wright et al. (2012) suggest part of this may stem from the likely lower metallicity in the vicinity of the distant Kepler field objects. These distant objects will have significant heights above the galactic plane, possibly separating the population from that of the RV surveys, by age and potentially, metallicity. Beatty & Gaudi (2008) show that in the S/N limited case (i.e. Kepler) the transit detection rate goes as , hence the properties of the RV and transit survey planets are considerably different, notably the larger radii and shorter orbital periods discovered by the transit surveys.

Figure 4: Light curves (left) and power spectra (right) of QU Sge. Three peaks (, and cycles d) are found in the power spectrum of QU Sge out-of-eclipse data. Panel (a): Out-of-eclipse SX Phe pulsations with the best fitting model over plotted. Beating of the frequencies detected is clearly evident on nightly inspection. The data for different nights in Panel (a) have been offset by multiples of mag for clarity, is the Julian Day for a given night. Panel (b): power (p) spectrum of the raw data of QU Sge. Panel (c): power spectrum after the strongest peak ( cycles d) has been removed. Panels (d) and (e): power spectra after the removal of the remaining two significant peaks, cycles d and cycles d, respectively.

If we assume an average of only Kepler and OGLE-III occurrence rates we would expect there to be hot Jupiters per thousand MS stars. Assuming % of those transit, we expect there to be detectable transiting hot Jupiters in the NITES survey. Johnson et al. (2010) suggest that the giant planet occurrence rate is dependent on both the host star mass and metallicity. However, Eq 8 of Johnson et al. (2010) does not account for the fraction of giant planets of short period orbits. In reality, the likelihood of detecting a hot Jupiter on the MS of M71 depends on several factors - metallicity, stellar mass and orbital period - the details of which remain uncertain. This makes the search for transiting giant planets in M71 an interesting endeavour.

Using the BLS detection efficiencies shown in Fig. 3 we calculate an average of a % chance of recovering a transiting hot Jupiter signal over the MS magnitude range . No significant detections were returned from the synthetic light curve analysis at .

4.2 Transit Detection Method

The light curves were searched for transit signals using the BLS algorithm of Kovács, Zucker & Mazeh (2002). We searched for transit durations between and periods between d in frequency steps of d. The Signal Detection Efficiency (SDE) was calculated for each BLS power spectrum using Eq of Kovács, Zucker & Mazeh (2002), and we assume the same criterion to represent a significant detection.

5 Results & Discussion

Our search for variable stars has discovered new variables towards M71, and of the previously proposed variables have been confirmed and had their periods determined or refined. The new variables all lie within the cluster’s projected tidal radius . They have been given numbers ranging from v24 to v40, in keeping with the nomenclature of Park & Nemec (2000, hereafter PN00). Section 5.1 highlights the results from our search for hot Jupiters in the NITES survey data. A brief description of only the remarkable - in the sense that their period or type of variability is found to be different here than that published in the literature - previously discovered variables (QU Sge, S4, v10 and v16) is given in §5.2. The details of the others (v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v19, v20, v21 and v23) are summarised in Tables 3 and 4. Section 5.3 gives an overview of the new variable stars discovered here (v24-v40). Folded light curves for those with a single periodicity detected are shown in Figs 5 & 7. For clarity the light curves have been averaged into bins of in phase and the error bars have been excluded. Figures 6 and 8 show the light curves of the multiply periodic variables v26, v27, v28, v31, v34, v35, v36 and v40. For clarity, in Figs 6 and 8 the data points have been averaged into bins per night and the error bars have also been excluded. A summary of the frequencies detected in the multiply periodic variables is given in Table 2. A finding chart for each of the new variables is given in Fig. 9. We would like to note that it is notoriously difficult to perform precise photometry is crowded stellar environments and in the presence of saturated stars located close to variable objects (e.g. Scottfelt et al. 2013). The inevitable effects of blending may influence to a certain degree the amplitude and/or the period of variable stars in crowded areas or regions surrounding saturated objects.

5.1 Transiting Hot Jupiters Towards M71

A total of light curves were flagged as having sufficient photometric accuracy to detect a R planet on a d orbit and were analysed using the BLS method above. A total of objects showed significant detections (SDE ), two of which are variable stars (v28 and v30 - see §5.2) and one is a probable eclipsing binary of PN00 (v10 - confirmed here in §5.3). The remaining two when folded on the detected period showed none of the characteristics of a transiting hot Jupiter; shallow, flat bottomed and short duration transits with respect to the period of variability. Although our sample is of more than stars, in order to place robust statistical constraints on the hot Jupiter frequency in a relatively metal-rich GC, a much larger sample of the cluster’s MS is required.

5.2 Previously Discovered Variables Towards M71

Figure 5: Folded light curves for the singly periodic, previously known variable stars QU Sge, S4, v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v10, v16, v19, v20, v21 and v23, the newly confirmed Algol-type eclipsing binary v24 and the newly discovered eclipsing binary v25. The periods of S4, v10, v16, v19, v20, v21 and v23 have been improved through the analysis here, v23 is also confirmed as an Algol-type eclipsing binary. PN00 suggested v16 could be an SX Phe-type variable but from the analysis presented here it appears to be eclipsing binary.

QU Sge is a semi-detached Algol-type eclipsing binary containing an SX Phe-type component discovered by Jeon et al. (2006). This was the first pulsating component of an eclipsing binary found in a GC. Jeon et al. (2006) refined the orbital period of QU Sge to d. The eclipsing binary light curve was subtracted from the data revealing short-period ( d) low-amplitude ( mag) variations which are consistent with SX Phe-type variability. Jeon et al. (2006) find two peaks in the power spectrum of QU Sge, cycles d and cycles d. As the ratio of the frequencies detected is larger than (typical value for fundamental and first-overtone modes assumed by Jeon et al. 2006), they conclude that at least one of the two periods originates in a non-radial mode.

A period of d for the eclipses of QU Sge (see Fig. 5) was found here, which is in agreement with the period d of Jeon et al. (2006). Nightly inspection of our QU Sge light curves also showed SX Phe-type variations. Non-eclipsing data were normalised with a second order polynomial and converted to differential magnitudes to highlight the variability. The results are shown in Fig. 4. The out-of-eclipse data were analysed collectively using a Fourier analysis. We find a non-equally spaced triplet in the power spectrum of QU Sge, with cycles d, cycles d and cycles d, two of which are similar to those of Jeon et al. (2006) (see Fig. 4). The fundamental period of high-amplitude () Scuti stars is shorter than the first over-tone pulsation period by a factor of (Poretti et al., 2005). The frequency ratios, , and , from our analysis are also larger than , hinting that at least two of the detected periods originate from non-radial modes.

Figure 6: Light curves for the multiply periodic variables v26, v27, v28 and v31, over plotted with the best fitting models from the Fourier analyses. The data have been combined into binned points per night. For clarity, the data for v26 and v28 are shown in groups of and nights (starting at HJD 2455739, where is the Julian Day for a given night) and each groups of nights have been offset by integer numbers of and mag, respectively. The significant frequencies detected for each object are given in Table 2.

The amplitude of the variations observed here are much larger, mag compared to mmag of Jeon et al. (2006) and is seen to vary over time (see Fig. 4). The greater amplitude observed here is likely caused by the modulation of the light curve by the three different, but closely separated frequencies. The difference in photometric bands between our observations and those of Jeon et al. (2006) (white light vs ) may also contribute to the differences observed in pulsation amplitudes. Assuming we have detected radial pulsations and the fundamental frequency we use the period-luminosity relation of McNamara (2011, their Eq 1) to estimate the distance to QU Sge. We find kpc, which places QU Sge in the foreground of M71 and agrees with the marginal cluster membership probability (%) of Cudworth (1985). If the first overtone has been detected the distance above will be shorter by .

Our NITES observations of several other previously known variables have revealed some interesting results. S4 was originally proposed to be an RR Lyrae variable by Sawyer Hogg (1973), however it actually appears to be a detached eclipsing binary with a period of d, see Fig. 5. v10 was discovered by PN00 as a possible W UMa-type contact binary system with a period of d. However, the period found here () differs significantly from that of PN00 by min. PN00 quote no errors on the period of v10. We suspect that the difference most likely stems from their incomplete phase coverage of their observations, see Fig. 5. Finally, the variable star v16 was suggested to be an SX Phe-type variable by PN00. Our NITES observations show v16 to have variations of differing depths, see Fig. 5. v16 therefore appears to be a possible contact binary rather than a SX Phe variable.

5.3 New Variables Towards M71

v24: The first new eclipsing binary system found in the direction of M71 in over years. We find a period using PDM of d. v24 appears to be a detached eclipsing binary system with a primary eclipse depth approximately twice as large as the secondary (see Fig. 5).

Figure 7: Folded light curves for the newly-discovered, singly periodic Scuti-like variable stars v29 and v30, and the variable stars v32, v33, v37, v38 and v39. No significant periodicity could be determined for the variable v38 as less than one full cycle has clearly been observed. v39 displays large scatter in the data points on a nightly basis, the long-term periodic variations are more clearly seen unbinned.

v25: A possible long-period grazing eclipsing binary (see Fig. 5). Using PDM we find a period of d. v25 is located in a very crowded region towards the centre of M71 (see Fig. 9). This, combined with its relatively long period and shallow eclipse depth ( mmag) may explain why it was previously undetected. A possible X-ray active binary candidate s07 (Elsner et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2010) is located from v25 and its position is encompassed in the photometry aperture.

v26: A short period, low-amplitude variable with a best-fitting period of d, found using an LS periodogram. This object appears to be a Scuti-type variable but as its metallicity has not been determined here we cannot definitively distinguish between SX Phe and Scuti variations. For now we name v26 and the following four variables (v27, v28, v29 and v30), Scuti-like variable stars. Fourier analysis of v26 returns significant (SNR) peaks in the power spectrum and cycles d (see Fig. 6).

v27: A low amplitude, Scuti-like variable. We find a period of d using a LS periodogram. When folded on this period v27 appeared to vary irregularly. Nightly inspection of the data showed variations on a shorter timescale. v27 was folded on the next significant period, d, where it shows regular, low-amplitude Scuti-like variations. A further two possible X-ray active binary candidates s27a and s27b (Elsner et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2010) are located and from v27, respectively. Given the small angular separation we believe v27 to be X-ray binary candidate s27a. Fourier analysis of v27 returned many peaks with slightly reduced significance () which could indicate aperiodic variability. Regardless, Fig. 6 shows the variations of v27 along with the best fitting model created using the three most significant peaks and cycles d. Although and appear to be multiples of one another, phasing upon either period individually results in a poorer fitting model.

v28: A Scuti-like low-amplitude variable. The strongest peak in the LS periodogram of v28 was found at d. The Scuti-like variations are also visible on a nightly basis with this period. v28 is the shortest period Scuti-like variable discovered here, with a period within d suggesting it could possibly be an SX Phe-type variable (McNamara, 2011). Fourier analysis of v28 returned significant (SNR) peaks in the power spectrum , and cycles d (see Fig. 6).

Figure 8: Light curves for the multiply periodic variables v34, v35, v36 and v40, over plotted with the best fitting models from the Fourier analyses. The data have been combined into binned points per night.The significant frequencies detected for each object are given in Table 2.

v29: A larger amplitude ( mag) Scuti-like variable (see Fig. 7). We find a best-fitting period of d using PDM. Variations on this period are clearly visible in a night-by-night inspection of the data.

v30: The final Scuti-like variable discovered here. We find a period of d using PDM. v30 was seen to vary only on the nights towards the end of the observing campaign and requires additional observations to confirm the type of variability (see Fig. 7).

v31: A possible eclipsing binary with asymmetrical eclipses. Using PDM we find a best-fitting period of d. Analysis of the Fourier power spectrum of v31 returned peaks at and cycles d. Similarly to v27, and appear to be multiples of each other but both frequencies are required to fit the double peaked variation shown in Fig. 6.

v32: A relatively faint long-period variable star of undefined type (see Fig. 7). We find a best fitting period of d using PDM. It is possible that less than one full cycle of this star has been measured.

v33: A long period variable star of undefined type (see Fig. 7). We detect a significant period at d using a LS periodogram.

v34: A possible long period eclipsing binary. Analysis of v34 using a Fourier power spectrum returns significant frequencies , and cycles d (see Fig. 8). v34 also displays short period variations, however the periods of which could not be detected with any significance. v34 appears to be the most complexly variable system discovered here.

v35: A long period, possible semi-regular variable. v35 is much brighter than the MS in M71 and is possibly a pulsating giant or a field star. Fourier analysis of v35 returns several significant (SNR) peaks in the power spectrum , and cycles d. The light curve of v35 appears to be best fitted by a combination of them all (see Fig. 8).

v36: A bright variable star of undefined type. Our LS analysis returned a period of d. A search for aliases around this period showed that not all the variations were of equal strength. The power spectrum of v36 shows significant peaks at and cycles d. It is clear that the object is variable (see Fig. 8) but the nature of the variability is uncertain. Further observations are required to constrain any periodicity.

v37: A long-period variable star of undefined type (see Fig. 7). We find a best-fitting period of d. The X-ray binary s20 (Elsner et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2010) is located from v37 and encompassed by the photometry aperture.

Star
cycles d cycles d cycles d
QU Sge 33.9167 36.1381 38.8864
v26 2.41849 2.00666
v27 0.28104 0.14195
v28 12.0535 3.00624 11.61858
v31 0.40896 0.20367
v34 0.02182 0.04191 2.00960
v35 0.01822 0.06496 0.03961
v36 0.04437 0.03407
v40 0.03723 0.02534
Table 2: A summary of the significant frequencies detected in the multi-periodic light curves of stars observed during the NITES survey of M71. All except QU Sge are newly discovered here.
Figure 9: Finding charts for the new variables (v24 - v40) discovered here. The charts are each and taken from the WFC data described in §2.2. North is up and East is left.

v38: A very long period variable, possibly the longest detected here (see Fig. 7). We find one significant peak ( cycles d, d) in the Fourier power spectrum of v38, however this is much longer than the length of the NITES survey hence constraining the period is not possible. Continued observation of v38 is required to constrain the period.

v39: A long period low-amplitude variable of undefined type. A best-fitting period of d was found using a LS periodogram. The data shows a large intra-nightly scatter and binning masks the smooth long term variations seen unbinned (see Fig. 7).

v40: A possible semi-regular variable. Analysis of the power spectrum of v40 reveals significant peaks at and cycles d (see Fig. 8). It appears from Fig. 8 that additional frequencies are present in v40 but are not detected with sufficient significance in our survey data.

Star R.A. Dec. r V N Period P Period Variable
(J2000) (J2000) (arcsec) (mag) (d) (d) improved type
Previously discovered:
QU Sge 195349.34 +1845′43.26″ 74.0 0.892 23 466 3.79100 0.00061 No SD / MP
S4 195404.91 +1847′24.55″ 272.2 0.367 22 229 2.525252 0.000033 Yes DB
v1 195357.49 +1843′33.76″ 247.6 0.573 23 243 0.348904 0.000025 No CB
v2 195357.09 +1845′46.97″ 166.2 0.357 23 213 0.36721 0.00001 No CB
v3 195350.84 +1847′51.48″ 99.2 0.168 23 238 0.373856 0.000018 No CB
v4 195349.34 +1847′49.70″ 84.3 0.096 23 206 0.55615 0.00002 No DB
v5 195334.28 +1844′05.01″ 227.4 0.373 23 240 0.404341 0.000015 No CB
v10 195401.76 +1847′16.73″ 226.8 0.106 21 642 0.796674 0.000033 Yes CB?
v16 195358.96 +1849′28.48″ 249.5 0.062 23 227 0.642204 0.000047 Yes CB?
v19 195409.60 +1847′21.78″ 337.7 0.594 23 174 6.1070 0.0042 Yes EB?
v20 195323.44 +1842′10.61″ 418.6 0.540 9 585 0.469967 0.000028 Yes CB
v21 195325.54 +1851′17.44″ 401.7 0.330 23 129 0.357907 0.000005 Yes CB
v23 195357.68 +1842′50.67″ 283.0 0.602 23 293 5.657241 0.000027 Yes DB
Newly discovered:
v24 195408.11 +1842′13.41″ 412.0 0.936 23 268 1.33673 0.00029 Yes DB
v25 195346.43 +1846′46.01″ 8.6 0.033 22 690 11.66332 0.00056 Yes EB?
v26 195347.94 +1849′37.19″ 179.3 0.045 23 223 0.413481 0.000052 Yes Sct-like / MP
v27 195351.48 +1846′00.53″ 87.3 0.020 23 466 3.5582 0.0012 Yes Sct-like / MP
v28 195328.40 +1841′45.31″ 386.5 0.013 23 137 0.082964 0.000002 Yes Sct-like / MP
v29 195342.72 +1845′58.35″ 62.5 0.070 23 245 0.190207 0.000017 Yes Sct-like
v30 195353.08 +1847′14.36″ 106.3 0.030 23 190 0.166267 0.000018 Yes Sct-like
v31 195402.86 +1842′50.31″ 331.8 0.112 17 153 2.4452 0.0011 Yes EB? / MP
v32 195407.41 +1843′04.73″ 372.6 0.174 23 355 48.178 0.021 Yes LP
v33 195328.62 +1844′05.73″ 291.1 0.181 23 240 5.418895 0.00018 Yes LP
v34 195341.39 +1844′44.41″ 132.8 0.043 22 962 45.8295 0.0056 Yes MP
v35 195345.09 +1843′01.35″ 219.0 0.114 22 486 54.88470 0.00056 Yes SR? / MP
v36 195411.28 +1852′01.56″ 481.9 0.098 19 828 22.5377 0.0016 Yes SR? / MP
v37 195348.95 +1847′13.76″ 53.8 0.080 20 905 24.04635 0.00083 Yes LP
v38 195405.44 +1851′58.36″ 421.3 0.067 22 695 LP
v39 195338.34 +1849′25.33″ 197.9 0.021 22 732 11.18242 0.00051 Yes LP
v40 195341.90 +1851′24.81″ 290.7 0.147 20 932 26.86000 0.00062 Yes SR? / MP
Table 3: Summary of the new and previously discovered variables observed in the NITES survey. The distance from the cluster centre r in arcseconds was calculated for each star using the cluster centre coordinates R.A. (J2000) 195346 and Dec. (J2000) +1846′40″ of PN00. is the peak-to-peak change in brightness in magnitudes and is the final number of reduced observations analysed for each target. The periods for multiply periodic variables are the principal periods detected. A period improvement is defined as yes if it has been newly determined here or significantly refined with respect to previously published values. (DB) detached binary; (SD) semi-detached binary; (CB) contact binary; (EB) eclipsing binary of undefined type; ( Sct-like) Scuti-like variable star; (LP) Long period variable of undefined type; (SR) Semi-regular type variable; (MP) multiply periodic.

5.4 No RR Lyrae stars in M71?

One striking thing to note about M71 is the lack of RR Lyrae (RRL) variable stars discovered in previous surveys. RRL variables are old, metal-poor, population II, pulsating horizontal branch stars and make up a significant fraction of all the variables known in GCs. M71 is an intermediate population cluster and is relatively metal rich (only M69 has a higher metallicity), which likely contributes to the lack of RRL stars. The colour-magnitude diagram of AH71 places the Horizontal Branch (HB) of M71 at V which is well above the sensitivity limit of the NITES survey. However, the HB is relatively short and quite red so that a potential RRL progenitor in M71 may never evolve blue enough on the HB to reach the RRL instability strip.

The QUEST RRL survey (Vivas et al., 2004) found that fundamental mode (RRLab) and first overtone (RRLc) variables have mean band amplitudes and periods of and mags and and d, respectively. The unbinned data in Fig. 2 (black points) shows that the NITES telescope has a typical photometric accuracy of mmag at HB magnitudes in M71. The faintest stars surveyed here ( mag) typically have an mag. Therefore, given that the amplitude of variation of RRLab and RRLc stars is several orders of magnitude larger than our photometric performance on the HB of M71, and the high time resolution of our survey data, we conclude that the cluster is devoid of RRL stars with amplitudes mag, within the field surveyed (). Further observation of the outer regions ( of M71 are required to determine if M71 is completely devoid of RRL variable stars.

6 Estimating Spectral Types and Membership Probabilities of Variable Stars Towards M71

Figure 10: Figure 5 of GM00 over plotted with the photometry of the variable star population measured from our WFC data. Stars in red are newly discovered variable stars, those in blue are the previously known objects and those in green are previously known objects that were not observed in the NITES survey.

In order to constrain the spectral types of the variables observed in our survey we obtained photometry of M71 using the WFC on the INT. GM00 present photometry of the cluster but do not cover all of the variable stars described in §5.2 and §5.3. We plot the position of each variable star, as observed in our data in Fig. 10. Stars brighter than in fig. 5 of GM00 were probable cluster members as determined by their proper motion analysis. Stars fainter than were taken from Hodder et al. (1992).

Janulis & Straizys (1984) measure variations in reddening towards M71 of . The Galactic reddening maps derived from the IRAS and COBE infrared sky surveys (Schlegel, Finkbeiner & Davis, 1998)666http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/DUST/ also show a variation in reddening across the face of the cluster. We assume the reddening towards each variable star of Schlegel, Finkbeiner & Davis (1998) as the average reddening in a area surrounding each object, see Table 4. The average reddening from previous surveys of M71 in several photometric systems, from Janulis & Straizys (1984) and references within, and those of GM00, AH71, Cudworth (1985, hereafter CW85) and Grundahl, Stetson & Anderson (2002) gives . The Schlegel, Finkbeiner & Davis (1998) maps indicate a mean reddening of towards M71 (Grundahl, Stetson & Anderson, 2002), which is in agreement with the general consensus of previous studies. We calculate the intrinsic and for each variable star using the values of Schlegel, Finkbeiner & Davis (1998), assuming and subsequently estimate a small range of spectral types for each variable using the transformations of Schmidt-Kaler (1982), see Table 4. As the spectral type conversions of Schmidt-Kaler (1982) require knowledge of the star’s luminosity class we quote a range of spectral types, for which the main-sequence and giant star transformations of Schmidt-Kaler (1982) encompass the intrinsic colour. Spectroscopy of the variable stars towards M71 is needed to confirm their spectral types, distances and cluster membership probabilities more rigorously.

v36 appears on Simbad as an M2.5 giant (the only variable star in M71 with a known spectral type) but with no reference to its classification. CW85 determines S4 (V4) to be a field star based on its proper motion and he calculates that QU Sge (2-255, V3) has a marginal cluster membership probability of 51%. Liller & Tokarz (1981) also show QU Sge to be a nonmember based on its radial velocity but Jeon et al. (2006) argue against this. In §5.2 we also determine QU Sge to be a non-member based on the period-luminosity relation of the SX Phe pulsating component of the system. Of the remaining variables presented here only others were included in the CW85 proper motion survey of M71. v22 (KC 2-216), v34 (KC 1-91) and v37 (KC 1-38) have cluster membership probabilities of , and %, respectively. The additional names in parentheses given above for S4, QU Sge, v22, v34 and v37 are those of CW85.

Star V (B-V) E(B-V) Spectral Notes
(mag) (mag) (mag) Type
Previously discovered:
QU Sge F0 , p=
S4 F4/F5
v1 G0/G2
v2 G0/F9
v3 G8/K2
v4 F8
v5 F9/G0
v8 G1/G5
v9 F5
v10 K3/K6
v11 G4/K0
v12 G5/K1
v13 F3
v14 F9/G0
v15 F9/G0
v16 F4
v17 G0/G4
v18 G1/G6
v19 G9/K3
v20 F6
v21 F9/G0
v22 F4
v23 F9/G2
Newly discovered:
v24 F4
v25 G2/G9
v26 G2/G8
v27 G2/G9
v28 F1
v29 F9/G1
v30 F6/F7
v31 G2/G9
v32 G4/K0
v33 G0/G3
v34 G5/K1
v35 K3/K6
v36 K3/K7
v37 G4/K0
v38 G2/G9
v39 F8/F9
v40 K4/K7
Table 4: Variable star parameters summary. Intrinsic magnitudes and colours for of the variable stars towards M71 calculated using the reddening measurements of Schlegel, Finkbeiner & Davis (1998) and . Stars v6 and v7 could not be identified with confidence in our WFC data. The range of spectral types have been estimated using the transformations of Schmidt-Kaler (1982). We note that the specific spectral type of each object depends upon the determination of its luminosity class, which in turn requires a full spectroscopic classification not carried out here. In the notes column the Distances ( in kpc) to the short period Scuti-type variables are calculated using from Column 1 and Eq 1 of McNamara (2011), and the cluster membership probabilities ( %) are those from the proper motion survey of Cudworth (1985).

Using the period-luminosity relation of McNamara (2011) (Eq 1) and we calculate distances in parsecs to each of the Scuti-like variables towards M71. Assuming the fundamental frequency has been detected we find that all but (v28) of the Scuti-like variables v26-v30 are located at large distances behind the cluster, see Table 4. v28 is the shortest period variable detected here, consistent with an SX Phe-type variability and is found to be in the foreground of the cluster at kpc. If the period which we have identified is the first over-tone rather than the fundamental, then the distances we have determined will be shorter by 15%.

Within the area surveyed we find no evidence for RRL variables towards M71 hence the ratios of different types of variables in M71 differs significantly from the variable star ratios in GCs of Clement et al. (2001). From the literature they estimate % of variable stars in GCs to be RRL, % are eclipsing binaries, % are SX Phe variables, % are Cepheids and % are semi-regular variables. Based on the current population of variable stars towards M71 we find that % are eclipsing binaries, % are Sct-like, % semi-regular and % are long or multiply periodic variables of undefined type.

7 Summary

Our high-cadence observations of M71 have revealed an additional previously undiscovered variable stars towards the cluster, one of which is a detached eclipsing binary, are possible eclipsing binary systems, are Scuti-like variables, are long period variable stars of an as yet undefined type and are possible semi-regular variables. We confirm the variability of previously known variables and refine or calculate for the first time periods for of them. Our data shows that the non-member S4 is most likely a detached eclipsing binary and not an RRL variable as previously suggested, and v16 appears to show variations of differing depths, suggesting an eclipsing binary rather than an SX Phe-type variable as proposed by PN00.

We estimate spectral types for of variables towards M71 (see Table 4), v6 and v7 which could not be identified with confidence in our WFC data and were subsequently excluded from our analysis. We cross correlate our catalogue of variable stars with the proper motion survey of CW85 and find cluster membership probabilities for variable stars (QU Sge, S4, v22, v34 and v37), of which are non-members and probable members. None have a high probability of belonging to M71. As M71 is located at low galactic latitude we expect increased contamination of variable stars from the field along the line of sight to the cluster, compared to other GCs in the halo. We estimate distances to variable stars towards M71 (QU Sge, v26, v27, v28, 29 and v30) using the period-luminosity relation of McNamara (2011), finding that all but one lie at large distances behind the cluster, assuming the fundamental mode of oscillation has been detected. Continued observation of M71 is also required to constrain any periodicity in of the newly discovered variable stars for which a period could not be constrained.

Our search for transiting giant planets revealed significant transit-like detections. However none of these were consistent with a typical hot Jupiter signal. Two are the new short period, low amplitude variable stars v38 and v30, one is the probable eclipsing binary v10 of PN00 (which is confirmed here) and the light curves of the remaining two objects are inconsistent with giant transiting planet-like detections when folded on the periods detected. As only a small fraction of the MS in M71 was surveyed with the NITES telescope it is difficult to constrain the giant planet frequency in M71 with confidence. Continued observation of a larger fraction of the MS is required to place limits on the giant planet frequency. To increase the likelihood of detecting a transiting hot Jupiter in M71, or any GC for that matter, requires deeper observations of a more significant fraction of the cluster’s main-sequence. In the case of M71, to do so would require photometry from a larger facility ( m class telescopes, e.g. WFC on INT) to reach the photometric precision required to detect transiting giant planets at fainter magnitudes.

We have shown that the NITES telescope is sensitive to low amplitude variability ( mag) and well suited to its future role as a follow-up telescope for transiting exoplanets. The recent discovery of transiting Neptune-sized planets in the old OC NGC 6811 (Meibom et al., 2013) has shown that planets do indeed survive in OCs. Hence, new surveys of younger, more metal-rich OCs using the NITES telescope could discover more transiting giant exoplanets in the future.

Acknowledgments

This research has made use of the Simbad database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. The authors would like to acknowledge the Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes for their support during the installation of the NITES telescope and Wojtek Pych for the use of his difference-imaging package DIAPL2.

References

  • Alard & Lupton (1998) Alard C., Lupton R. H., 1998, ApJ, 503, 325
  • Arp & Hartwick (1971) Arp H. C., Hartwick F. D. A., 1971, ApJ, 167, 499
  • Beatty & Gaudi (2008) Beatty T. G., Gaudi B. S., 2008, AJ 686, 1302
  • Bergbusch & VandenBerg (2001) Bergbusch P. A., VandenBerg D. A., 2001, ApJ, 556, 322
  • Bertin & Arnouts (1996) Bertin E., Arnouts S., 1996, A&AS, 117, 393
  • Bramich et al. (2005) Bramich D. M., Horne K., Bond I. A., Street R. A., Collier Cameron A., Hood B., Cooke J., James D., Lister T. A. et al., 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1096
  • Breger et al. (1993) Breger M., Stich J., Garrido R., Martin B., Jiang S. Y., Li Z. P., Hube D. P., Ostermann W., Paparo M., Scheck M., 1993, A&A, 271, 482
  • Burke et al. (2006) Burke C. J., Gaudi B. S., DePoy D. L., Pogge R. W., 2006, AJ, 132, 210
  • Claret (2000) Claret A., 2000, A&A, 363, 1081
  • Clement et al. (2001) Clement C. M. Muzzin A., Dufton Q., Ponnampalam T., Wang J., Burford J., Richardson A., Rosebery T., Rowe J., Hogg H. S., 2001, AJ, 122, 2587
  • Cudworth (1985) Cudworth K. M., 1985, AJ, 90, 65
  • Cumming, Marcy & Butler (1999) Cumming A., Marcy G. W., Butler R. P. 1999, ApJ, 526, 890
  • Cumming et al. (2008) Cumming A., Butler R. P., Marcy G. W., Vogt S. S., Wright J. T., Fischer D. A., 2008, PASP, 120, 531
  • Di Cecco et al. (2012) Di Cecco A., Bono G., Monelli M., Stetson P. B., Becucci R., Degl’Innocenti S., Moroni P. G. P., Buonanno R., 2012, Star Clusters in the Era of Large Surveys, ed Moitinho A. & Alves J., 207
  • Dravins et al. (1998) Dravins D., Lindegren L., Mezey E., Young A. T., 1998, PASP, 110, 610
  • Eastman, Siverd & Gaudi (2010) Eastman J., Siverd R., Gaudi B. S., 2010, PASP, 122, 935
  • Elsner et al. (2008) Elsner R. F., Heinke C. O., Cohn H. N., Lugger P. M., Maxwell J. E., Stairs I. H., Ransom S. M., Hessels J. W. T., Becker W., Huang R. H. H. et al., 2008, ApJ, 687, 1019
  • Erben et al. (2005) Erben T., Schirmer M., Dietrich J. P., Cordes O., Haberzettl L., Hetterscheidt M., Hildebrandt H., Schmithuesen O., Schneider P. et al., 2005, Astronomische Nachrichten, 326, 432
  • Geffert & Maintz (2000) Geffert M., Maintz G., 2000, A&AS, 144, 227
  • Gilliland et al. (2000) Gilliland R. L., Brown T. M., Guhathakurta P., Sarajedini A., Milone E. F., Albrow M. D., Baliber N. R., Bruntt H., Burrows A. et al., 2000, ApJ, 545, L47
  • Golsbury et al. (2000) Goldsbury R., Richer H. B., Anderson J., Dotter A., Sarajedini A., Woodley K., 2010, AJ, 140, 1830
  • Gould et al. (2006) Gould A., Dorsher S., Gaudi B. S., Udalski A., 2006, Acta. Astron., 56, 1
  • Graham et al. (2013) Graham M. J., Drake A. J., Djorgovski S. G., Mahabal A. A., Donalek C., Duan V., Maker A., 2013, MNRAS, 434, 3423
  • Grundahl, Stetson & Anderson (2002) Grundahl F., Stetson, P. B., Andersen M. I., 2002, A&A, 395, 481
  • Harris (1996) Harris, W. E., 1996, AJ, 112, 1487
  • Hesser et al. (1987) Hesser J. E., Harris W. E., Vandenberg D. A., Allwright J. W. B., Shott P., Stetson P. B., 1987, PASP, 99, 739
  • Hodder et al. (1992) Hodder P. J. C., Nemec J. M., Richer H. B., Fahlman G. G., 1992, AJ, 103, 460
  • Hood et al. (2005) Hood B., Collier Cameron A., Kane S. R., Bramich D. M., Horne K., Street R. A., Bond I. A., Penny A. J., Tsapras Y., et al., 2005, MNRAS, 360, 791
  • Howard et al. (2012) Howard A. W., Marcy G. W., Bryson S. T., Jenkins J. M., Rowe J. F., Batalha N. M., Borucki W. J., Koch D. G., Dunham E. W. et al., 2012, ApJ, 201, 15
  • Huang et al. (2010) Huang R. H. H., Becker W., Edmonds P. D., Elsner R. F., Heinke C. O., Hsieh B. C., 2010, A&A, 513, A16
  • Janes (1996) Janes K., 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 14853
  • Janulis & Straizys (1984) Janulis R., Straizys V., 1984, Ap&SS, 100, 95
  • Jeon et al. (2006) Jeon Y. B., Kim S. L., Lee M. G., Lee H., Lee J. W., 2006, ApJ, 636, L129
  • Johnson et al. (2010) Johnson J. A., Aller K. M., Howard A. W., Crepp J. R., 2010, PASP, 122, 894, 905
  • Kovács, Zucker & Mazeh (2002) Kovács G., Zucker S., Mazeh T., 2002, A&A, 391, 369
  • Kuschnig et al. (1997) Kuschnig R., Weiss W. W., Gruber R., Bely P. Y., Jenkner H., 1997, A&A, 328, 544
  • Lenz & Breger (2005) Lenz P., Breger M., 2005, CoAst, 146, 53
  • Liller & Tokarz (1981) Liller M. H., Tokarz S. P., 1981, AJ, 86, 669
  • Lomb (1976) Lomb N. R., 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447
  • Marcy et al. (2005) Marcy G., Butler R. P., Fischer D., Vogt S., Wright J. T., Tinney C. G., Jones H. R. A., 2005, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 158, 24
  • Mayor & Queloz (1995) Mayor M., Queloz D., 1995, Nature, 378, 355
  • Mayor et al. (2011) Mayor M., Marmier M., Lovis C., Udry S., Ségransan D., Pepe F., Benz W., Bertaux J., Bouchy F. et al., 2011, ArXiv e-prints, 1109.2497
  • McCormac et al. (2013) McCormac J., Pollacco D., Skillen I., Faedi F., Todd I., Watson C. A., 2013, PASP, 125, 548
  • McNamara (2011) McNamara D. H., 2011, AJ, 142, 110
  • Meibom (2011) Meibom S., 2011, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts 218, 311.03
  • Meibom et al. (2013) Meibom S., Torres G., Fressin F., Latham D. W., Rowe J. F., Ciardi D. R., Bryson S. T., Rogers L. A., Henze C. E. et al., 2013, Nature, 499, 55
  • Mochejska et al. (2005) Mochejska B. J., Stanek K. Z., Sasselov D. D., Szentgyorgyi A. H., Bakos G. Á., Hradecky J., Devor V., Marrone D. P., Winn J. N., Zaldarriaga M., 2005, AJ, 129, 2856
  • Mochejska et al. (2006) Mochejska B. J., Stanek K. Z., Sasselov D. D., Szentgyorgyi A. H., Adams E., Cooper R. L., Foster J. B., Hartman J. D., Hickox R. C., Lai K., Westover M., Winn J. N., 2006, AJ, 131 1090
  • Park & Nemec (2000) Park N. K., Nemec J. M., 2000, AJ, 119, 1803
  • Pepper et al. (2008) Pepper J., Stanek K. Z., Pogge R. W., Latham D. W., DePoy D. L., Siverd R., Poindexter S., Sivakoff G. R., 2008, AJ, 135, 907
  • Pollacco et al. (2006) Pollacco D. L., Skillen I., Cameron A. C., Christian D. J., Hellier C., Irwin J., Lister T. A., Street R. A., West R. G. et al., 2006, PASP, 118, 1407
  • Pont, Zucker & Queloz (2006) Pont F., Zucker S., Queloz D., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 231
  • Poretti et al. (2005) Poretti E., Suárez J. C., Niarchos P. G., Gazeas K. D., Manimanis V. N., van Cauteren P., Lampens P., Wils P., Alonso R. et al., 2005, A&A, 440, 1097
  • Press & Rybicki (1989) Press W. H., Rybicki G. B., 1989, ApJ, 338, 277
  • Quinn et al. (2012) Quinn S. N., White R. J., Latham D. W., Buchhave L. A., Cantrell J. R., Dahm S. E., Fűrész G., Szentgyorgyi A. H., Geary J. C. et al., 2012, ApJ, 756, L33
  • Roberts, Lehar & Dreher (1987) Roberts D. H., Lehar J., Dreher J. W., 1987, AJ, 93, 968
  • Sackett (1999) Sackett P. D., 1999, NATO ASIC Proc. 532: Planets Outside the Solar System: Theory and Observations, ed Mariotti J, M. & Alloin D., 189
  • Sawyer (1953) Sawyer, H. B, 1953, JRASC, 47, 229
  • Sawyer Hogg (1973) Sawyer Hogg H., 1973, Publications of the David Dunlap Observatory, 3, 6
  • Scargle (1982) Scargle J. D., 1982, ApJ, 263, 835
  • Schlegel, Finkbeiner & Davis (1998) Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., Davis M., 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
  • Schmidt-Kaler (1982) Schmidt-Kaler T., 1982, in Landolt-Bšrnstein New Series, Group 6, Vol. 2b, Stars and Star Clusters, ed. K. Schaifers & H.-H. Voigt (Berlin: Springer)
  • Scottfelt et al. (2013) Skottfelt J., Bramich D. M., Figuera Jaimes R., Jørgensen U. G., Kains N., Harpsøe K. B. W., Liebig C., Penny M. T., Alsubai K. A., 2013, A&A, 553, A111
  • Smith et al. (2006) Smith A. M. S., Collier Cameron A., Christian D. J., Clarkson W. I., Enoch B., Evans A., Haswell C. A., Hellier C., Horne K. et al., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1151
  • Smolinski et al. (2011) Smolinski J. P., Lee Y. S., Beers T. C., An D., Bickerton S. J., Johnson J. A., Loomis C. P., Rockosi C. M., Sivarani T., Yanny B., 2011, AJ, 141, 89
  • Stellingwerf (1978) Stellingwerf R. F., 1978, ApJ, 224, 953
  • Stetson (1987) Stetson P. B., 1987, PASP, 99, 191
  • Street et al. (2003) Street R. A., Horne K., Lister T. A., Penny A. J., Tsapras Y., Quirrenbach A., Safizadeh N., Mitchell D., Cooke J., Collier Cameron A., 2003, MNRAS, 340, 1287
  • Vivas et al. (2004) Vivas A. K., Zinn R., Abad C., Andrews P., Bailyn C., Baltay C., Bongiovanni A., Briceño C., Bruzual G. et al., 2004, AJ, 127, 1158
  • Wozniak (2000) Wozniak P. R., 2000, Acta Astron., 50, 421
  • Weldrake et al. (2005) Weldrake D. T. F., Sackett P. D., Bridges T. J., Freeman K. C., 2005, ApJ, 620, 1043
  • Weldrake, Sackett & Bridges (2008) Weldrake D. T. F., Sackett P. D., Bridges T. J., 2008, ApJ, 674, 1117
  • Wright et al. (2012) Wright J. T., Marcy G. W., Howard A. W., Johnson J. A., Morton T. D., Fischer D. A., 2012, ApJ, 753, 160
  • Yan & Mateo (1994) Yan, L., Mateo, M., 1994, AJ, 108, 1810
  • Zacharias et al. (2010) Zacharias N., Finch C., Girard T., Hambly N., Wycoff G., Zacharias M. I., Castillo D., Corbin T., DiVittorio M. et al., 2010, AJ, 139, 2184

Appendix A Photometric Performance & Noise Analysis of the Nites Telescope

Figure 11: Black and grey points represent data taken during dark and bright time, respectively. The left and middle plots are RMS vs flux diagrams taken during dark and bright time, respectively. The right plot is the RMS vs binned exposure time for the average of the nine brightest non-variable stars during bright and dark time. The green, blue, red, purple, yellow and brown dashed lines represent the noise models from the target, sky, read noise, dark current, scintillation and flat fields, respectively. In the left panel the noise models of the sky, dark current and read noise (blue, purple and red dashed lines) are almost completely overlapping. In the central panel the noise models of the dark current and read noise (purple and red dashed lines) are also overlapping. The solid black line represents the total noise model, while the black and grey dashed lines show the expected decrease in RMS in the presence of Gaussian noise only, where is the number of points per bin.

During our survey of M71 the photometric performance of the system was measured using full moon and first quarter observations compared to a theoretical noise model. The noise model combines errors from the target, sky, read noise, dark current and scintillation with an estimation of the error in the flat fielding process using Eq 8;

(8)

where , , and are the flux from the target, sky, dark current and the read noise inside the photometry aperture, respectively and;

(9)
(10)

are the errors from flat fielding and the scintillation noise according to Dravins et al. (1998), respectively. is the number of pixels inside the photometric aperture, is the combined flux in e pix in the master flat field (typically e pix), is the diameter of the telescope aperture in cm, is the airmass, is the altitude of the observatory in m, m is the atmospheric scale height, is the integration time in s and is a variable dependent on angle between the line of sight and wind direction. , or when observing perpendicular to the wind, close to the zenith and parallel to the wind, respectively.

The image subtracted frames (see §2.1) typically have a background level with a mean flux , hence measuring the sky level directly is impossible. However, the noise from the sky will remain in the subtracted images and is expected to be Gaussian in nature. Hence, by measuring the standard deviation in the background of each subtracted image, the flux from the sky in the photometry aperture in e can be estimated using:

(11)

where is the nightly average standard deviation of the background in the subtracted images and is the gain in .

Figure 11 (left and centre) show the noise model of the NITES telescope along with the typical photometric accuracy during dark and bright time, respectively. It is evident from Figure 11 (right) that the noise in the system is essentially Gaussian as the data points follow the decrease in RMS, where is the number of binned points. Figure 11 (right) demonstrates that the system is relatively free from systematic noise down to the sub-mmag regime. A photometric accuracy of mmag is reached with binned exposure times of s during dark time while bright time observations reach RMS mmag on the same time scale.

Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
102754
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description