A MultiScale Approach to Describe Electrical Impulses Propagating along Actin Filaments in both Intracellular and Invitro Conditions
Abstract
An accurate and efficient characterization of the polyelectrolyte properties for cytoskeleton filaments are key to the molecular understanding of electrical signal propagation, bundle and network formation, as well as other relevant physicochemical processes associated with biological functions in eukaryotic cells and their potential nanotechnological applications. In this article, we introduce an innovative multiscale approach able to account for the atomistic details of a proteins molecular structure, its biological environment, and their impact on electrical impulses propagating along wild type Actin filaments. The approach provides a novel, simple, accurate, approximate analytic expression for the characterization of electrical impulses in the shape of soliton waveforms. It has been successfully used to determine the effects of electrolyte conditions and voltage stimulus on the electrical impulse shape, attenuation and kern propagation velocity in these systems. It has been shown that the formulation is capable of accounting for the details of electroosmosis and convection, as well as the electrical double layer of Gactins includding the electrical conductivity and capacitance. The approach predicts higher electrical conductivity, linear capacitance and nonlinear accumulation of charge in intracellular condictions. Our results also show a siginificant influence of the voltage input on the electrical impulse shape, attenuation and propagation velocity. The filament is able to sustain the soliton propagation at almost constant kern velocity in the invitro condition, but the soliton displays a remarkable deceleration in the intracellular condition. Additionally, the solitons are narrower and travel faster at higher voltage input. Whereas, the voltage input does not play an important role on the soliton kern velocity in the invitro condition. Overall, Our results predict the propagation of electrical signal impulses in the form of solitons for the range of voltage stimulus and electrolyte solutions typically present in intracellular and invitro conditions. This multiscale theory may also be applicable to other highly charged rodlike polyelectrolytes with relevance in biomedicine and biophysics. It is also able to account for molecular structure conformation (mutation) and biological environment (protonations/deprotonations) changes often present in pathological conditions.
Keywords: Electrical signal propagation, Actin filaments, Theoretical developments, Electrochemistry, Polyelectrolytes
1 Introduction
Actin filaments (Factin) are long charged rodlike cytoskeleton polymers, which carry out many important biological activities in eukaryotic cells.^{1; 2} These microfilaments have recently gained wide notoriety for their fascinating polyelectrolyte properties.^{3} According to single filament experiments in solution,^{4; 5} Factin have been shown to sustain ionic conductance and transmit electrical currents in the form of localized counterionic waves about the polymer’s surface. The velocity of propagation along the surface of an actin microfilament is consistent with the velocity of propagation for neuronal impulses. Hence, in principle, concurrent propagation of both electrical signals along actin microfilaments, and electrochemical currents along the axonal membrane are highly possible. Another intriguing property of these proteins is their capacity for overcoming electrostatic interactions to form higherorder structures (bundles and networks) in the cytoplasm. For instance, cytoskeletal filaments are often directly connected with both ionotropic and metabotropic types of membrane embedded receptors, thereby linking synaptic inputs to intracellular functions. ^{6} Conducting microfilaments may also govern at least some aspects of overall ion channel behavior within microvilli. ^{7; 8}
All of these observations provide strong evidence on the polyelectrolyte nature of Factin, which provides unique, yet still poorly understood, conducting and bundling formation properties in a variety of neuron activities including intracellular information processing, regulating developmental plasticity, and mediating transport. Certainly, the molecular understanding of the polyelectrolyte properties of cytoskeleton filaments will not only open unexplored frontiers in biology and biomedicine, but it will also be crucial for the development of reliable, highly functioning small devices with biotechnological applications such as bionanosensors and computing bionanoprocessors. ^{9; 10; 11; 12; 13} Therefore, it is of crucial importance to determine the underlying biophysical principles and molecular mechanisms that support the ionic conductance and electrical impulse transmission in Actin filaments under a variety of biological environments.
The current understanding of these phenomena builds on a pioneers work, Fumio Oosawa suggested around 50 years ago that electric signals could be channeled through a medium along a microfilament due to the electrolyte solution forming an electron cloud along the filament length ^{14}. It was Manning who introduced condensation theory ^{15}, which provided the foundation for linear polymers to enable electrical currents in the form of ionic movements. As charged polyelectrolytes, cytoskeleton filaments may contain a proportion of their surrounding counterions in the form of a dense or "condensed" cloud about their surface, as long as, there is a sufficiently high linear charge density, a critical concentration of multivalent ions, and a small dielectric constant of the surrounding medium. These criteria are indeed met for actin filaments in neurons. ^{16; 14; 17} Further, molecular structure analysis indicates the distribution of counterion clouds is nonuniform along the filament’s length. This is because Factin originates from the linear polymerization of globular actin (Gactin) units. Each of these units have tight binding sites that mediate headtotail interactions to form a doublestranded helix. Therefore, resembling a solenoid with a fluctuating current flowing as a result of voltage differences generated by the ends of the filament. Additionally, with the filament core separated from the rest of the ions in the bulk solution by the counterion condensation cloud, this overcast of counterions may act as a dielectric medium between the filament and bulk layer. Hence, providing Factin both resistive and capacitive behaviors that may be associated with a highly conductive medium. This conduction along microfilaments is characterized by the decomposition of an electrical input pulse into discrete delayed charge portions. These patterns clearly indicate the existence of charge centers with corresponding counter ion clouds along the polymer axis. As a consequence, electrically forced ions entering one end of the biopolymer will result in ions exiting the other end (Fig. 1). Therefore, actin polymers may serve as "electrical nanobiowires" whom can be modeled as nonlinear inhomogeneous transmission lines known to propagate nonlinear dispersive solitary waves .^{18} These waves can take the form of localized electrical signal impulses .^{19; 20; 21} However, this basic understanding on electrical impulses propagating along actin filaments does not account for all conductance properties of microfilament bundles. ^{22} More recent approaches, based on GouyChapman electrical double layer type models and meanfield PoissonBoltzmann theories, provide further insight into the ionic equilibrium distributions and electric potential properties near the polymer surface, which arise from the charged polyelectrolyte surface, continuum solvent dielectric medium, and mean electrostatic potential energy generated by mixed salts comprised of pointlike ions ^{23; 24; 25; 26; 27}. These methods are shown to break down for cytoskeleton filaments under certain situations, because they entail several approximations in their treatment of the ions and solvent molecules. They don’t account for water crowding, ion size asymmetry or electrostatic ion correlation effects, all of which are likely to play a fundamental role in providing a quantitative description of the polyelectrolyte nature of cytoskeleton filaments, and consequently, their conducting and electrical signal propagation properties ^{28; 29; 30; 31}.
In this article, we introduce a novel multiscale () approach to describe nonlinear dispersive electrical impulses propagating along Actin filaments (see Fig. 1). In section II, an atomistic model for the Factin ^{32} and its biological environment is used to determine the polyelectrolyte properties and molecular mechanisms governing Gactins in the polymerization state. This approach, along with a suitable modification of NernstPlanck theory ^{33}, are used to calculate the monomeric radial and axial flow resistances. In addition, a more sophisticated approach based on a classical solvation density functional theory ^{34; 35; 36; 37; 31} is required to calculate the monomeric radial ionic capacitance. In section III we use this monomer characterization to capture the biophysics and biochemistry at larger (microfilament) scale distances. We utilize those parameters in a nonlinear inhomogeneous transmission line prototype model which accounts for the monomermonomer interactions, and consequently, the electrical impulse propagation along the filament length. A novel approximate analytic solution is obtained for this model and utilized in section IV to characterize the electrical impulse peak, width, and velocity of propagation under several voltage stimulus and electrolyte conditions.
2 Gactin Characterization in the Polymerization State
2.1 Cylindrical Biomolecule Model for Gactins
The physicochemical properties of each monomer composing the actin filament are different from those as single globular actin proteins, because polymerization into filamentous form generates several conformational changes on each monomer. Therefore, we retrieve the information on the monomer molecular structure from one of the most recent 13 monomers, biologically assembled wild type Factin filament models posted on the protein data bank: the Cong model ^{32} (see Fig.2a). It provides a detailed molecular characterization including the amino acids sequence and the number and type of residues exposed to the electrolyte. This uncharged molecular structure in pdb format is uploaded into pdb2pqr webserver ^{38} to assign atomic charges and sizes, add hydrogens, optimize the hydrogen bonding network, and renormalize atomic charges of the residues exposed to the surface due to pH effects (protonation/deprotonation process). The resulting charged molecular structure at is used to extract information on the effective filament and monomer length , as well as the total filament charge , where is the electronic charge (see Fig. 2b). The filament length and total charge are used to estimate the filament linear charge density . The resulting structure is uploaded into “3v: voss volume voxelator” webserver ^{39} to estimate the total filament volume . From here the effective monomer radius of the molecular structure model is calculated . The linear charge density and radius are subsequently used to calculate the filament (= monomer) surface charge density . This effective radius , length and surface charge density are used in the next sections to determine the longitudinal and transversal ionic flow resistances, capacitance and selfinductance for each monomer along the filament length ((see Fig. 2c).
2.2 Electrical and Conductive Properties of Gactins in Solutions
In this approach, the electrical properties of a single Gactin are characterized by a capacitor, two resistances and a selfinductance component. The capacitor, whose capacitance changes with applied voltage, originates the nonlinearity behavior of the electrical impulse. The structural periodicity in the arrangement of monomers generates the dispersion of the electrical impulse along the filament. Whereas, the losses in the transmission media is accounted for by a series and shunt resistors, which represent the finite conductivity of the conductors and the dielectric insulator between the conductors, respectively. Additionally, the inductive component to the electrical properties of the electrical impulse is due to Factin’s doublestranded helical structure, which induces the ionic flow in a solenoidal manner around each monomers. A detailed characterization of these properties is provided below.
2.2.1 Longitudinal and Transversal Ionic Flow Resistances
We use transport and Ohm’s laws as well as NavierStokes and Poisson’s theories to obtain simple and accurate, approximate analytic expressions for the radial (transversal) and axial (longitudinal) ionic flow resistances. To make calculations tracktable, we assume azimuthal and axial symmetry on the electric potential generated by charged ions and monomer surface charge densities. We also assume that the radial electrolyte convection is neglectable.
In the longitudinal ionic flow resistance calculations, we also assume that an external perturbation voltage is applied between the monomer ends, which are separated by a distance . This voltage drop generates a uniform axial electric field along the monomer with magnitude , and consequently, an electroosmotic (migration) force on the ions in the electrolyte. Another longitudinal driving force considered in this approach is the natural convection arising from the movement of the fluid characterized by the axial velocity profile . As a result, the transport law provides the following equation for the axial electric surface current density ^{23}
(1) 
This expression depends on the electrolyte conductivity
(2) 
and the total charge density distribution
(3) 
In previous expressions, is the slip velocity position, , is Faraday’s constant and the mobility, valence, and concentration of ion species are represented by , , and , respectively.
Moreover, we combine Poisson’s and the NavierStokes’ equations to obtain the following expression for the axial velocity profile
(4) 
This expression indicates that under the action of a uniform axial electric field, the velocity profile of the fluid is proportional to the radial electric potential drop . In the latter equation, and represent the absolute bulk permittivity and viscosity parameters, respectively. On the other hand, the radial electric potential is generated by the total charge density distribution as dictated by the Poisson’s equation
(5) 
To obtain an analytic solution for the electric potential we use a Boltzmann distribution and DebyeHückel (linearized PB) approximation for the ion density distributions
(6) 
where is the bulk concentration of species , the gas constant, and the electrolyte temperature. After substitution of eqn (6) into eqn (3), the use of the bulk electroneutrality condition (), and the replacement of the resulting expression into eqn (5), we obtain
(7) 
where is the modified Bessel function of the second kind, represents the Debye length , the monomer surface charge density, is the radius predicted by the cylindrical model. Note that the Debye length in eqn (7) plays an important role providing an estimate on the width of the electrical double layer.
The approximate analytic solution obtained for the electric potential is subsequently replaced into eqn (6), (5), (4), and (2) to get an analytic solution for the surface current density. This solution is integrated over the Bjerrum length , e.g. the length scale below which electrostatic correlations are important. In the latter expressions, is the relative bulk solvent dielectric constant; the vacuum permittivity; the Boltzmann’s constant, and the temperature in Kelvin degree. The integration yields the following expression for the total longitudinal ionic current
(8) 
After performing some algebra and integral calculations using mathematica11.1 software ^{40} expression 8 becomes
(9) 
where is the bulk electrolyte conductivity
(10) 
the corrections predicted by our approach
(11) 
and is the following analytic function
Finally, the longitudinal ionic flow resistance is calculated from ohm’s law, which relates the axial voltage drop and the total electric current as . As a result, we have
(12) 
where represents the effective cross section surface area facing perpendicular to the longitudinal ionic flow and is the effective axial ionic conductivity.
A similar approach is used for the transversal ionic flow resistance calculations. Here we assume that the electroosmosis generated by the gradient of the radial electric potential is the only driving (migration) force dominating the radial surface current density
(13) 
Since this expression does not depend on the axial and azimutal coordinates, the total radial current passing from the inner to the outer layer is obtained by multiplying the radial surface current density by the lateral monomeric surface layer area at a section in the solution, e.g. . ^{23} Since is a constant independent of position, this expression can be integrated across the electrical double layer to obtain
(14) 
Therefore,
After some algebra we obtain a linear dependence between the total radial current and the electric potential drop across the electrical double layer following the Ohmlike law equation
where the radial ionic flow resistance is given by
(15) 
In the later expression represents the effective lateral surface area facing perpendicular to the radial ionic flow, is the effective radial ionic conductivity, and the corrections to the bulk electrolyte conductivity
(16) 
We note that our results recover more oversimplified approximations for cytoskeleton filaments when these contributions are neglected ,^{24; 25} namely
Additionally, under the conditions considered in this article, , which is needed to justify a meanfield theory for the diffuse part of the electrical double layer.
2.2.2 Ionic Capacitance
The PoissonBoltzmann theory used in the previous calculations is certainly inaccurate to describe the differential capacitance of electric double layers in ionic liquids and its correlation with the monomer surface charge density and electric potential .^{29; 28} In the present article, we use a more sophisticated approach based on a classical solvation density functional theory (CSDFT).^{34} The polyelectrolyte properties of the biomolecule are characterized by the effective molecular radius and uniform bare surface charge density predicted by the Cong molecular structure model, whereas the biological environment is represented by an electrolyte (either alkaline, acid or neutral) solution comprised of ionic species (characterized by crystal radius, ^{41} charge and bulk concentration), explicit water molecules (characterized by neutral ions at experimental size () and bulk concentration ()) (Fig. 2). The approach was successfully tested on segments of BDNAs and its application is extended here to describe the polyelectrolyte properties of a segment of Factin (e.g., a monomer)..
To calculate the capacitance of the cylindrical electrical double layer we consider a monomer perturbated by changing the pH level (alkaline, acid and neutral levels) in the solution. These pH changes generate perturbations on the surface charge density , which are predicted by the Cong molecular structure model and titration calculations as explained previously. For each surface charge density value we use CSDFT to predict the induced changes on the corresponding surface electrical potential . These two sets of parameter values can be correlated using a cubic fitting polynomial curve. These curves are used to calculate the slope analytically to obtain the following expression for the differential capacitance
(17) 
Integration of this expression with respect to the electric potential along the voltage drop across the electrical double layer leads to the following expression for the total charge accumulated in the capacitor ^{42}
(18) 
where represents the linear capacitance of the capacitor and the theory’s parameter characterizing its nonlinear behavior. Specific values for these parameters in intracellular and invitro conditions are provided below.
2.2.3 SelfInductance
In reference (24) Faraday’s law is used to estimate the selfinductance for Gactins which is found to be of the order of picoHenry
(19) 
where and represent the magnetic permeability and the number of turns (e.g. how many ions could be lined up along the length of a monomer), respectively. Here , where is the average ion size.
According to this result, the contribution to the electrical signal propagation for Factins is expected to be neglectable, however it may play an important role in other highly charged filaments. Therefore, in the present work we include this rough estimate of selfinductance in the approach.
3 Lossy, Nonlinear, Dispersive Transmission Line Model for Microfilaments
Loan counterions surrounding microfilaments may be transferred from one charge center (e.g. monomer) to the next, giving rise to locally restricted excess of partial charges representing the propagation of electrical impulses along the conducting pathway.^{8} This kind of charge transfer mechanism between monomers is well known to generate flow of weakly bound electrons in conducting polymer systems where the electrical current and propagation velocity are different in nature. These transmission line models have been successfully demonstrated to characterize electron currents along conducting polymers, and are often utilized to describe ionic conductance and electrical impulse propagation along cytoskeleton filaments. ^{18; 26; 43} Here we use the sequential arrangement of elementary electric units introduced in references. ^{24} In this case, each unit represents a single Gactin characterized by the capacitor, resistances and selfinductance described in the previous section.
Application of Kirchoff’s laws on the discrete transmission line model constructed by elementary cells (monomers) provides a differential equation for describing the electric potential and ionic current across cell units. The current conservation law at the node A between the cells “” and “”, provide the following equation (see Fig. 3)
(20) 
where represents the current across the capacitor in the cell “”. By replacing eqn (18) into eqn (20) we have
(21) 
On the other hand, Kirchhoff’s voltage law along the circuit ABCD generates the following expression (see Fig. 3)
(22) 
where is given by
(23) 
and represents a constant DC bias electric potential. Further substitution of eqn (23) into eqn (22) yields
(24) 
The later equation can be written in terms of the characteristic impedance of the electrical circuit unit and the new function , where as usual:^{26} and . In this article, the characteristic impedance is estimated as follows
(25) 
where , , and is a parameter characterizing the electrical circuit unit time scale.
(26) 
(27) 
Since Factins are a filamentous form of its subunits gactin, we have that the individual monomer length is much smaller than the filament length . As a result, we can approximate eqn (26) and (27) as the voltage and current travel down the actin filament by moving from one adjacent circuit modeled monomer to the next. Using the continuum approximation with a Taylor series in terms of the parameter we obtain the following expansion for
(28) 
Consequently,
(29) 
(31) 
The later equation can be conveniently rewritten as follows
(32) 
The master equation (32) can be solved for in terms of dimensionless variables
(33) 
After some manipulations and using the following relationships , , and , we have
(34) 
where . Since we look for slow changes on the time evolution in the electrical impulse solution of eqn (34), , the time rate in the electrical impulse is considered to be much slower than on the traveling variable. As a result, an analytic solution of eqn (34) can be obtained by performing the change, and defining new parameters , . Accordingly, eqn (34) becomes the wellknown perturbated Kortewegde Vries (pKdV) differential equation ^{21; 44}
(35) 
The left and right sides in the later equation represent the regular KdV equation ^{45} and the corresponding perturbation, respectively. The first term to the left resembles the time dependent term in Fick’s diffusion law, whereas the second and third terms represent the nonlinearity and dispersive contributions arising from the condensed ion cloud in the electrical double layer and the diffusive spreading of ions along the microfilament, respectively. On the other hand, the first and second terms to the right represent the dissipation and damping perturbations, respectively.
Equation (35) appears in a variety of systems ^{46} describing the propagation of electrical solitons in a nonlinear dispersive transmission line in the form of localized voltage waves. An initial pulse in the transmission line may decay into a sequence of solitons and a tail. In this work, we will consider single soliton solutions only. In doing so, we assume that the perturbation is so small that it has a negligible influence on the soliton formation. Therefore, the perturbation will manifest itself by affecting the soliton only after an extended amount of time from its origination. Thus, the mutual interaction between solitons becomes unimportant when the soliton movement is of the order of its length. In what follows we consider this problem in the first approximation. In this case, the solution of equation (35) for nondissipative systems represents a non perturbated pulse soliton of the regular KdV equation (^{47})
(36) 
with dimensionless constant voltage amplitude and propagation velocity . Solitarywave solutions that propagate without changing form may also be expected due to a balance between nonlinearity and dispersion (e.g. ), hence requiring that the effect of the perturbing terms on the shape of the soliton cancel each other out. ^{48} Otherwise, when and/or are not zero, equation (36) is no longer the solution of the perturbed KdV equation. ^{47; 45; 49; 50}
In this analysis, we look for an analytic solution of eqn (36) in the framework of the perturbation theory on the basis of the adiabatic approximation. ^{47} In that case, the solution is a soliton pulse in the form :
(37) 
where and satisfy the following equations
(38) 
(39) 
and is the perturbation term defined in eqn (35). The calculation of the integrals appearing in eqn (38) and (39) provide the following analytic solutions
(40) 
(41) 
The validation of these exppressions is discussed in Appendix A, where we provide a comparison between the exact numerical and our the approximate analytic solution.
Note that , therefore the unperturbated dimensionless amplitude is linearly proportional to the external voltage input
(42) 
It is worth mentioning that eqn (40), (41) and (45) describe the evolution of one soliton in the presence of a perturbation characterized by the amplitudes and which are expected to yield a slow change on the soliton parameters. ^{47} Therefore, the expansions appearing in eqn (40) and (41) provide a good estimation of the characteristic soliton travel time (in seconds) . This time should be, in principle, larger than the characteristic ion flow time, such that . Additionally, for the electrolyte conditions and models considered in the present article, we have , and which yield the following approximate implicit equation for the impedance
with solution and .
Another important soliton characterization is given by the expression for the kern velocity of the electrical impulse along the filament (in units of ). By rewriting the argument of solution (37) in terms of the original variables we have
(43) 
which provides the following expressions for the time dependent wave number and kern propagation velocity
(44) 
where
(45) 
Based on these results, the time average kern velocity of the soliton in a time interval can be calculated as usual
(46) 
Here represents the vanishing time, which in this work is considered as the time taken by the initial soliton amplitude to be attenuated , namely .
4 Results and Discussion
In this section, we use expressions (12), (15), (17), (19), (37), (40) and (41) to investigate the impact of different electrolyte solutions and voltage stimulus on the physicochemical properties of Gactins and electrical signal propagation along Factins. We investigate two electrolyte solutions, one representing an intracellular biological environment in physiological solution conditions (140mM , 4mM , 75mM , and 012mM at 310 K), ^{51} whereas the other represents in vitro conditions ^{5} (0.1M and 0.1M at 298 K). For the voltage stimulus, we consider both and peak voltage inputs in order to simulate the typical electric potential present in cells and single microfilament experiments.
4.1 Model’s Parameters
Our calculations on the Debye length reveal the formation of a wider electrical double layer in the intracellular condition than invitro condition, namely
The effective conductivity predicted by our approach relative to the conventional results reads
with corresponding resistances
and impedances
The results predicted on ion conductivity indicate an increase (decrease) of the resistances in typical invitro (intracellular) environments compared to the corresponding bulk values. These corrections, given by expressions (11), display a balance (competition) between migration and convection forces, which depend in a nontrival fashion, on the electrical double layer thickness, the Debye length, the electrochemistry (particles electropheresis mobility, valence, bulk density and size, solvent viscosity and dielectric permittivity), as well as the monomer surface chemistry (surface charge density and size).
Another neoteric result of this work is the prediction of the nonlinear charge accumulation due to the linear monomeric capacitance behavior, namely .. To obtain the numerical values of the parameters and , we correlate the set of surface charge densities values predicted by the Cong model with the set of surface electrical potentials values predicted by CSDFT. We use the Fit function provided by mathematica software ^{40} to generate a cubic fitting polynomial between these two parameters as shown in Fig. 4. These curves, when used to calculate the slope analytically, generate the following value for and
The results on the capacitor show a remarkable increase in the linear capacitance in the intracellular condition, which has a high impact on the monomer’s ability to accumulate electric energy in the capacitor. Additionally, the parameter is negative for the intracellular condition, whereas it is positive for the invitro condition. Accordingly, the nonlinearity of the charge accumulated in the capacitor mimics the behavior of a nMOS varactor in accumulation mode and a diode ^{52} in our electric circuit unit model for the intracellular and invitro conditions, respectively. We note that the sign of the parameter also affects the polarization of the transmission line voltage (soliton) . Certainly, the following caculations
(47) 
predict that the electrical impulse will propagate upright and down for invitro and intracellular conditions, respectively. Another key role of this parameter arises from eqn (42) and (47) which predict a linear dependence on the unperturbated soliton amplitude. Indeed, the substitution of these values for into eqn (42) yields and (intracellular condition) and and (invitro condition), for and voltage inputs, respectively.
4.2 Electrical Signal Propagation
We use expressions 37, 40 and 41 along with the numerical values for the parameters obtained previously to characterize the kern propagation velocity, shape and attenuation of the electrical impulse along an actin filament under a variety of conditions.
In Fig. 5, we illustrate the propagation of normalized electrical signals for voltage peak input for both intracellular and invitro conditions. Our results show similar soliton range of the order of a micron in both conditions. On the other hand, the soliton vanishing time is around 2 times longer in the intracellular condition. As a result, the biological environment has a high impact on the average kern propagation velocity and attenuation.
In Fig. 6, we compare several equitemporal snapshots of the soliton profile along Factin for both electrolyte conditions and voltage peak inputs. In both biological conditions, the electrical impulse shape is wider for lower voltage inputs. Although, when comparing to each other, the shape of the soliton is narrower for the intracellular condition than for the invitro condition. The shift between consecutive blue and orange peak positions shown in Fig. 6a) indicates that solitons at higher voltage input travel faster in the intracellular condition. On the other hand, Fig. 6b) implies the voltage input does not play an important role on the soliton kern velocity for invitro condition. This is in agreement with the results displayed in Fig. 7 for the soliton kern velocity. Clearly, the filament is able to sustain the soliton propagation at almost constant kern velocity in the invitro condition (see Fig. 7b), namely and for and voltage inputs, respectively. Nevertheless, a different scenario is manifiested in Fig. 7a) where the initial kern propagation velocity for the intracellular condition is around and for and peak voltage inputs, respectively. The corresponding time averaged kern velocity is much lower, namely and . This indicates a remarkable soliton propagation deceleration caused by a larger linear capacitance and nonlinear parameter values, higher longitudinal ionic flow resistance, smaller electrical double layer thickness, and higher ion asymmetries (size, concentration, electrophoresis mobility, electrical valence, species number), among other factors. Additionally, our results demonstrate a higher voltage peak input that generates a higher time average kern propagation velocity. This can be understood from eqn (44) and (45), which predict an increasing propagation velocity of the electrical impulse with , and consequently, with the voltage input by expression (42). On the other hand, the time average velocity comparison between both electrolyte conditions reveal that solitons from the invitro condition travel, on average, faster than the intracellular condition, while the soliton peak attenuation is slower in the latter condition. This biological environment impact on electrical signal propagation is displayed in Fig. 8, which illustrates the soliton amplitude time evolution. It indicates similar vanishing time for both voltage peak inputs in each electrolyte condition. This is a consequence of the neglectable impact of the amplitude on the characteristic soliton travel time . Moreover, our results reveal a more pronounced, fast soliton attenuation decay rate at higher voltage input (blue lines in Fig. 8). This is caused by higher voltage inputs generating larger values for , and consequently, larger values for the denominator in eqn (40) for .
Overall, our results predict that the propagation of electrical signal impulses in the form of solitons are possible for a range of electrolyte solution and voltage stimulus typically present in intracellular and invitro conditions. These predictions are in agreement with avialable experimental data on single Actin filaments. ^{5; 4}
5 Conclusions
In this article, we introduced an innovative multiscale approach which accounts for the atomistic details on the protein molecular structure and biological environment, as well as their impact on electrical impulses propagating in the form of micron solitons along wild type Actin filaments. The approach provides a novel, simple, accurate, approximate analytic expression for the characterization of solitons. It has been used to determine the effects of electrolyte conditions and voltage stimulus on the electrical impulse shape, attenuation and kern propagation velocity. The formulation has been shown to be capable of accounting for the details on the electrical double layer thickness and layering formation (ionic and water density distributions), the electrokinetics (particles electropheresis mobility, valence and size, solvent viscosity and dielectric permittivity), and the monomerelectrolyte interface (surface charge density and size) on the ionic electrical conductivity and capacitance.
Our results reveal a high impact of the electrolyte condition on electrical conductivity and capacitance in Gactins. The approach predicts wider electrical double layer, higher electrical conductivity, linear capacitance and nonlinear accumulation of charge in intracellular condictions, which play an important role on the electrical signal propagation along the Actin filament. Additionally, the nonlinearity of the charge accumulated in the capacitor resembles the behavior of a varactor and a diode in our electric circuit unit model for the intracellular and invitro conditions, respectively. The approach also predicts different polarization of the transmission line voltage (soliton). The electrical impulse propagates upright and down for invitro and intracellular conditions, respectively.
Our results also show a siginificant influence of the voltage input on the electrical impulse shape, attenuation and kern propagation velocity. The filament is able to sustain the soliton propagation at almost constant kern velocity for the invitro condition, but it displays a remarkable deceleration for the intracellular condition, with a slower soliton peak attenuation which is more pronounced at higher voltage input. Solitons are narrower and travel faster at higher voltage input in the intracellular condition. Whereas the voltage input does not seem to play an important role on the soliton kern velocity in the invitro condition. On the other hand, the electrical impulse shape is wider at lower voltage input and the soliton range of the order of one micron in both electrolyte conditions. Although, the vanishing time is of around 2 times longer in the intracellular condition.
Overall, our results predict that the propagation of electrical signal impulses in the form of solitons are possible for a range of electrolyte solutions and voltage stimulus typically present in intracellular and invitro conditions. Our preditions are an improvement on less recent theories and in good agreement with experimentaly obtained data for single filaments. One of the most important outcomes of this approach lies in the ability to determine the impact of molecular structure conformation (mutations) and physicochemical solution changes (protonations/deprotonations alterations) often present in pathological conditions in cytoskeleton filaments. This multiscale theory may also be applicable to other highly charged rodlike polyelectrolytes with relevance in biomedicine and biophysics. ^{3} Currently we are working along this direction with the ultimate goal of providing a molecular understanding for how and why age and inheritance conditions induce dysfunction and malformation in cytoskeleton filaments associated with a variety of diseases. ^{1}
Our preditions are an improvement on less recent theories and in good agreement with experimentaly obtained data for single filaments.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH Grant 1SC2GM11257801.
6 Appendix A
6.1 Numerical and Analytic Solution Comparison


We solve equation 35 numerically by using periodic boundary conditions and a voltage input signal:
(48) 
The artificially periodic boundary conditions were imposed to facilitate the resolution of the partial differential equation 35. However, for lengths of the microfilament big enough it does not affect the solution of the system. ^{53} The equation 35 was solved using the commercial software Mathematica 11.0. ^{40} We applied the numerical method of lines algorithm which is a efficient approach to numerically solve partial differential equations provided it is an initial value problem. This method discretizes all but one dimension, then integrates the semidiscrete problem as a system of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) or DifferentialAlgebraic Equations (DAEs). Additionally, we configured some parameters to obtain the solution. We set the WorkingPrecision (e.g. how many digits of precision should be maintained in internal computations) to the MachinePrecision value (doubleprecision floatingpoint numbers: 16 decimal digits) . The AccuracyGoal and the PrecisionGoal (e.g. how many effective digits of accuracy and precision, respectively) were set to a value equal to half the setting for WorkingPrecision. The InterpolationOrder of the solution (e.g. continuity degree of the final output) was set to 6 for the variable and 3 for the variable. The MaxStepFraction (e.g. maximum fraction of the total range to cover in a single step) was equal to 1/10, the MaxStepSize (e.g. maximum size of each step) was defined as the inverse of MaxStepFraction (10) and the MaxSteps (e.g. maximum number of steps to take in generating a result) was set to 10000. In the case of the NormFunction parameter, we used an infinitynorm. ^{40} It is worth mentioning that the inductance value considered in this work does not affect the numerical solution obtained for the soliton.
Fig. 9 shows the soliton profile comparison between the numerical and the approximate analytic solution (37) for both intracellular and invitro conditions, obtaining a good visual matching over the whole domain. In general, there was a short and intermediate time evolution where the adiabatic approximation is valid. Certainly, at longer times the perturbation increases the impact on the soliton shape and tails. Overall, the peak position and width, as well as the kern velocity between the numerical and analytic solutions in intracellular conditions, are in very good agreement. Whereas, the analytic solution predicts a wider and more attenuated soliton for invitro conditions. Higher order approximations and multisoliton solutions will be considered in a future work.
References
References
 1 C. dos Remedios and D. Chhabra. ActinBinding Proteins and Disease. Protein Reviews. Springer New York, 2008.
 2 N.J. Woolf and A. Priel. Nanoneuroscience: Structural and Functional Roles of the Neuronal Cytoskeleton in Health and Disease. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
 3 Paul A. Janmey, David R. Slochower, YuHsiu Wang, Qi Wen, and Andrejs Cebers. Polyelectrolyte properties of filamentous biopolymers and their consequences in biological fluids. Soft Matter, 10:1439–1449, 2014.
 4 H.F. Cantiello, C. Patenaude, and K. Zaner. Osmotically induced electrical signals from actin filaments. Biophysical Journal, 59(6):1284 – 1289, 1991.
 5 E.C. Lin and H.F. Cantiello. A novel method to study the electrodynamic behavior of actin filaments. evidence for cablelike properties of actin. Biophysical Journal, 65(4):1371 – 1378, 1993.
 6 JE Goldman. Immunocytochemical studies of actin localization in the central nervous system. Journal of Neuroscience, 3(10):1952–1962, 1983.
 7 Klaus Lange. Microvillar ion channels: Cytoskeletal modulation of ion fluxes. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206(4):561 – 584, 2000.
 8 Joachim Gartzke and Klaus Lange. Cellular target of weak magnetic fields: ionic conduction along actin filaments of microvilli. American Journal of Physiology  Cell Physiology, 283(5):C1333–C1346, 2002.
 9 Mark Sundberg, Richard Bunk, Nuria AlbetTorres, Anders Kvennefors, Fredrik Persson, Lars Montelius, Ian A Nicholls, Sara GhatnekarNilsson, Pär Omling, Sven Tågerud, et al. Actin filament guidance on a chip: toward highthroughput assays and labonachip applications. Langmuir, 22(17):7286–7295, 2006.
 10 Mark E. Arsenault, Hui Zhao, Prashant K. Purohit, Yale E. Goldman, and Haim H. Bau. Confinement and manipulation of actin filaments by electric fields. Biophysical Journal, 93(8):L42 – L44, 2007.
 11 Rémi Galland, Patrick Leduc, Christophe Guérin, David Peyrade, Laurent Blanchoin, and Manuel Théry. Fabrication of threedimensional electrical connections by means of directed actin selforganization. Nature Materials, 12(5):416–21, May 2013. A Press release CEA, CNRS, UJF, INRA has been published for this publication (February 11th, 2013): http://www2.cnrs.fr/presse/communique/2987.htm.
 12 Fernando Patolsky, Yossi Weizmann, and Itamar Willner. Actinbased metallic nanowires as bionanotransporters. Nature Materials, 3(10):692–5, 10 2004. Copyright  Copyright Nature Publishing Group Oct 2004; Last updated  20140430.
 13 Till Korten, Alf Månsson, and Stefan Diez. Towards the application of cytoskeletal motor proteins in molecular detection and diagnostic devices. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 21(4):477 – 488, 2010.
 14 Fumio Oosawa. Counterion fluctuation and dielectric dispersion in linear polyelectrolytes. Biopolymers, 9(6):677–688, 1970.
 15 Gerald S. Manning. The molecular theory of polyelectrolyte solutions with applications to the electrostatic properties of polynucleotides. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 11(2):179–246, 1978.
 16 G. S. Manning. Limiting Laws and Counterion Condensation in Polyelectrolyte Solutions I. Colligative Properties. J. Chem. Phys., 51:924–933, August 1969.
 17 Bruno H. Zimm. Use of the PoissonBoltzmann Equation To Predict Ion Condensation Around Polyelectrolytes, chapter 17, pages 212–215. 1986.
 18 Joseph A Kolosick, Don L Landt, HCS Hsuan, and Karle E Lonngren. Properties of solitary waves as observed on a nonlinear dispersive transmission line. Proceedings of the IEEE, 62(5):578–581, 1974.
 19 A. Noguchi. Solitons in a nonlinear transmission line. Electronics Communications of Japan, 57:9 – 13, Feb 1974.
 20 Karl E. Lonngren. Observations of solitons on nonlinear dispersive transmission lines. In Karl Lonngren and Alwyn Scott, editors, Solutions in Action, pages 127 – 152. Academic Press, 1978.
 21 S. Novikov, S.V. Manakov, L.P. Pitaevskii, and V.E. Zakharov. Theory of Solitons: The Inverse Scattering Method. Plenum, New York, 1