A micrometer-scale integrated silicon source of time-energy entangled photons

A micrometer-scale integrated silicon source of time-energy entangled photons


Entanglement is a fundamental resource in quantum information processing. Several studies have explored the integration of sources of entangled states on a silicon chip but the sources demonstrated so far require millimeter lengths and pump powers of the order of hundreds of mWs to produce an appreciable photon flux, hindering their scalability and dense integration.

Microring resonators have been shown to be efficient sources of photon pairs, but entangled state emission has never been demonstrated. Here we report the first demonstration of a microring resonator capable of emitting time-energy entangled photons. We use a Franson experiment to show a violation of Bell’s inequality by as much as 11 standard deviations. The source is integrated on a silicon chip, operates at sub-mW pump power, emits in the telecom band with a pair generation rate exceeding 10 Hz per , and outputs into a photonic waveguide. These are all essential features of an entangled states emitter for a quantum photonic networks.

I Introduction

Photonics is increasingly seen as an attractive platform for quantum information processing NielsenandChuang (); Ekert (); cryptoent (); Ent_Role (). In quantum cryptography Ekert (); BB84 () photons have several advantages as vectors of information, due to their long coherence times at room temperature and the possibility of being transmitted over the existing optical fiber infrastructure. The potential scalability and integrability of photonics also suggests its application in quantum simulation and computing Osellame (); Metcalf (); Shadbolt (); Silverstone (). The most common strategy for producing entangled photon pairs at room temperature is the use of the parametric fluorescence that can occur in a non-linear crystal EP12 (); Fujii (). While having high generation rates, these sources are very difficult to integrate. An ideal integrated source of entangled photons should be CMOS compatible for cost-effective and reliable production, easily interfaced with fiber networks for long range transmission in the telecom band, and take up little “real estate” on the chip. In these regards, the main results have been obtained by exploiting third order nonlinearities in silicon, and they are focused on the generation of qubits based on polarization entangled photon pairs Take_Pol (); Olislager () or entangled time-bins Take_0 (); Take (); Take_scirep () in long waveguiding structures. However, these devices require lengths ranging from fractions of a millimeter to centimeters to produce an appreciable photon pair flux, hindering their scalability. Another kind of quantum correlation of photon pairs is time-energy entanglement. This is arguably the most suitable format for the entanglement, as it can be easily manipulated in integrated optical circuits Shadbolt (), and it can be preserved over long distances in the fiber optical networks Tittel (); Marcikic () needed for communication between devices. Very recently, it has been shown that the use of time-energy entangled photon pairs in quantum key distribution can enable higher key generation rate compared to entangled photon pairs in lower-dimensional Hilbert spaces EnglundPRA2013 ().

In this work we demonstrate that silicon ring resonators in a silicon-on-insulator platform are an efficient source of time-energy entangled photon pairs. The large field enhancements that can be obtained in resonant structures Davanco (); PhM () and ring resonators in particular Lipson_nat (); Clemmen () combined with the large effective nonlinearities achievable in silicon ridge waveguides, of which they are made, allows the reduction of the emitter’s footprint by orders of magnitude and the drastic improvement of the wavelength conversion efficiency, together with the spectral properties of the emitted pairs, with respect to silicon waveguide sources.

Ii Sample structure and transmission spectra

The sample geometry is illustrated in Fig. 1a: the device is a ring resonator with a radius of 10 m, evanescently coupled to a straight silicon waveguide on one side of the ring; both the ring and the waveguide have transverse dimensions of 500 nm (width) and 220 nm (height) and are etched on a silicon-on-insulator wafer. The gap between the ring and the waveguide is 150 nm. The coupling of light onto and off of the chip is implemented by mode field converters, and the emission is extracted through a tapered optical fiber (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Note 1). A tunable continuous wave laser is used for characterizing the sample, and as a pump for the nonlinear optical experiments (see Methods). While such ring resonators would act as all-pass devices in the absence of scattering losses, they are somewhat akin to integrated Fabry-Perot cavities in that the modes of the electromagnetic field are identified by a comb of resonances. The transmission spectrum from our sample is shown in Fig. 1b, where the dips occur due to scattering losses at the resonances. The free spectral range is about 9 nm, and the resonance quality factors (Qs) are, on average, around 15000. The minimum transmission is about 3-5% on resonance, meaning that the ring almost satisfies the critical coupling condition, which maximizes the coupling between the ring and the bus waveguide.

Figure 1: Sample structure and characterization. (a) Sketch of the sample together with the input/output light coupling mechanism. The R=10 m ring resonator is evanescently coupled to a silicon nano-wire waveguide via a deep-etched 150 nm gap point coupler. An optical microscope image of the ring is shown in the inset. The waveguide ends at both sides with spot-size converters: 300 m long silicon inverse tapers ending in a 20 nm tip width covered by 1.5x2.0 m polymer waveguides. Light injection from a collimated pump laser is achieved by the use of an aspheric lens with numerical aperture NA=0.5. The output from the sample is collected with a PM lensed-fiber with a working distance of 3 m. (b) Transmssion spectrum of the resonator. The pump resonance is highlighted in green, the signal and idler resonances employed in the experiment are indicated in blue and red, respectively.

Iii Nonlinear spectroscopy and coincidence measurements

The nonlinear process responsible for the generation of photon pairs is spontaneous four wave mixing Clemmen (); Sharping (); Kraus (); OE (); Engin (): two pump photons at frequency are converted into signal and idler photons at frequencies and (as sketched in the inset of Fig. 1b). When using resonant structures, energy conservation implies three equally spaced resonances in energy (). Another advantage in using ring resonators is that the process is greatly amplified by the resonance, and it has been shown OL () that the generation rate goes as where is the quality factor of the resonances, the ring’s radius and the pump power. In our ring resonators, waveguide dispersion limits the bandwidth over which pairs can be generated for a fixed pump wavelength to a spectral range of about 80 nm, resulting in plentiful choice of possible signal and idler pairs: we have also verified that generation rate is almost the same for the fourth neighbouring resonances from the pump OL (). We note that in fact a single pump pulse will generate a number of entangled signal and idler pairs in parallel, with each entangled pair easily extracted because of their frequencies. But in this work we study only one pair, as highlighted by colors in Fig 1b: we use a resonance around 1550 nm (at the center of the telecommunication c-band) for the pump and its second nearest neighbor resonances for signal and idler; this spectral distance is chosen to optimize filtering of the laser background noise at the signal and idler frequencies.

Figure 2: Spontaneaous FWM and coincidences. Spectra of the spontaneous FWM experiment for five different coupled pump powers, signal and idler intensities are divided by the corresponding pump power to underline the superlinear growth of the intensity. The slight difference in intensity between the two peaks is due to slightly different coupling to the input/output bus of the signal and idler modes. For coupled pump powers above 1 mW, the pump wavelength was retuned to compensate the red shift of the resonance due to the thermo-optic effect Lipson_nat (). The horizontal scale is expanded around the signal and idler resonances, while the complete absence of detected photons at the pump resonance confirms the excellent rejection of the transmitted pump intensity in the set-up. (b) Scaling of the internal generation rates of signal (blue squares) and idler (red circles) photons in SFWM, varying the coupled pump power. The black dashed line is a guide to the eye proportional to the square of the pump power. The left axis indicates the photon flux measured at the sample output. (c) Measured coincidence histogram for a coupled pump power = 1 mW. The time resolution is 75 ps, and it is driven by the response time of the detectors.

Four wave mixing spectra are shown in Fig. 2a: two clear peaks of generated photons are evident at the signal and idler frequencies. It is important to notice that the pump laser is completely filtered out, so that only spontaneously generated photons are detected. The parametric nature of the emission process is confirmed by the superlinear increase of the generation rate with increasing pumping powers: the quadratic behavior of the generated beams is reported in Fig. 2b, where we plot the estimated generation rate of photon pairs inside the ring resonator and the output rate OL (). The output rate was directly measured at the sample output, as is detailed in the Supplementary information. The internal generation rate was estimated in the following way: we have directly measured a total insertion loss of 7 dB for the sample. Due to the sample symmetry, we assume that propagation and coupling losses from the ring resonator to the output fiber to be 3.5 dB. The internal generation rate is then estimated from the flux measured at the output by subtracting the 3.5 dB.

The generation rate can exceed 10 Hz; this is an extremely high rate, and will be beneficial for all experiments involving coincidence counting. The first step necessary to verify entanglement is to check that signal and idler photons are emitted in pairs: this was assessed via a coincidence experiment, in which the relative times of arrival of idler and signal photons were statistically analyzed OE (). The coincidence measurement shown in Fig. 2c is obtained employing the set-up described in Fig. 3a (and detailed in Supplementary Fig. 1) by masking the short arm of each interferometer (see Methods). The total losses undergo by signal and idler in the coincidence experiment are 31 dB and 34 dB respectively (Supplementary Note 1).

Figure 3: Correlations at the output of a double interferomenter. (a) Sketch of the signal and idler Michelson interferometers. The arm length difference of the two interferometers is the same to well within the coherence length of the generated photons (Supplementary Note 1). The movable mirrors on the short arms are connected to a piezo actuator and are used to control the relative phase between the short and long arms. At the outputs of the interferometers are two Superconducting Single Photon Detectors (SSPDs). (b) An instance of coincidence histogram measured at the output of the interferometers, taken for a couple pump power of 1.5 mW. The integration time is 120 s. The error bars indicate the error on the counts. The inset shows the absolute intensity at the output of each interferometer while varying the respective phase: the complete absence of interference confirms that the arm length difference is much larger that the coherence time on the generated photons.

An instance of a histogram of the arrival times is shown in Fig. 2c, where a distinct coincidence peak is visible over a small background of accidental counts; this is a clear signature of the concurrent emission of the signal-idler pairs. The 3.5 ns offset is determined by the different path lengths of the signal and idler photons. The coincidence measuments, for experimental consistency, were taken using the same set-up used to measure the entanglement as described below, by masking one arm in each interferometer. The losses from the set-up were directly measured for each component, and amount to 31 dB for signal photons and 34 dB for idler photons, giving a total loss of 64 dB on the coincidence rate. Almost all of these losses, as detailed in the Supplementary Information, are outside the source and are mainly given by the low quantum efficiency of the detectors used in these experiments and the interferometers.

Accidental counts are primarily due to emitted pairs of which only one photon is detected. The accidentals in the coincidence curve mainly come from detection of signal and idler photons belonging to different pairs. As all emission times are equivalent, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is also an indication of how likely it is for multiple pairs to be generated at the same time Gisin_fs (). In our case the SNR is about 70 in Fig. 2c, and higher than 100 in some of the measurements (see Methods and Supplementary Note 3).

Iv Entanglement test on the emitted photon pairs

The photon pairs are emitted simultaneously but, because of the continuous wave pumping, the emission time is indeterminate to within the coherence time of the pump laser; this is several s in our experiments. This systematic lack of information can lead to the pairs being time-energy entangled, as first pointed out by J. D. Franson FransonPRL (). In order to experimentally measure the entanglement we have used a double interferometer FransonPRL (); FransonPRA (), as shown in Fig. 3a. Photons at idler frequencies enter one interferometer, while photons at signal frequencies enter the other (see Methods Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Note 4). The unbalance between the two arms of the interferometers must be much greater than the coherence time of the signal and idler photons to avoid first order interference. In our case ns while ps ( was extracted from the linewidth of the modes).

Figure 4: Entanglement between signal and idler photons. (a)-(d) Histograms of the coincidence rate for four different phase settings. (e) Two photon interference of the double interferometer configuration: the coincidence count rate of the central peak is plotted as a function of the phase . The integration time is of 120 s for each point and the pump power is 1.5 mW. The dotted black curve is a best fit of the experimental data.

The absence of interference in each single interferometer was verified by varying the path differences independently in each of the interferometers and confirming that there was no change in the counting rate detected by the SSPDs, as shown in the inset of Fig. 3b. Then with the interferometer arms fixed Grassani2014 () we measured the arrival time of signal photons with respect to idler photons; the generated histograms reveal three relative arrival times. The earlier peak is due to the signal photon having taken the long path in the interferometer and the idler photon having taken the short path; the reverse holds for the latest peak. The middle peak is due to two indistinguishable paths: both photons taking the long path or both taking the short path. The inability to distinguish from which of these two cases the coincidence event arises, due to the long coherence time of the pump, causes second order interference FransonPRL (). The coincidence rate for the central peak is expected to be


where is the detected coincidence rate measured by covering one arm in each interferometer. Since signal and idler photons propagate in the same direction once they exit the sample, the phase term in the above expression is given by the sum of the phases acquired by the photons passing through the long arms with respect to the short ones: ; and is a constant phase term dependent on the unknown actual lengths of the interferometer arms.

The effect of varying is shown in Fig. 4 (the full experimental dataset is shown in Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 3). While the side peaks, corresponding to distinguishable events, have heights that are independent of , the number of the coincidence counts of the central peak oscillate between minima, close to zero events, and a maximum, close to four times the height of the side peaks, as shown in Fig. 4a-d. The height of the central peak as a function of is summarized in Fig. 4e. The trend is well fitted by a sinusoid curve of the type of eq (1). For the data of Fig. 4e, the best fit yields a visibility , proving a violation of Bell’s inequality by 7.1 standard deviations, and so we can conclude that we are generating time-energy entangled photon-pairs KwiatPRAR2472 ().

P (mW) R (MHz) SNR (%) V (%)
0.250.025 0.4 0.11 131.616.5 94.83.8 6.4 99.84
0.50.05 1.7 0.3 120.47.9 88.24.8 3.6 92.85.1
1.00.1 5.8 0.8 64.43.3 91.81.9 11.2 96.62.0
1.50.15 14 1.9 45.12.2 89.32.6 7.1 94.02.7
2.00.2 27 3.1 22.91.0 83.83.2 4.1 88.23.4
Table 1: Violation of Bell inequalities. Summary of the measured parameters for five values of the coupled pump power . is the pair emission rate, SNR the signal to noise ratio, is the visibility of the two photon interference extracted from the experimental raw data and is the number of standard deviation by which the Bell inequality is violated. Finally, the visibility is corrected for the limited visibility of the interferometers: .

V Discussion

The experiment was performed for various pumping powers (Supplementary Fig. 4), and the results are summarized in Table 1 (Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Note 3). The Bell’s inequality is violated in all cases and by more that 11 standard deviations in the best case. The visibility is limited by the background due to emission of multiple couples and possibly other parasitic luminescent processes (for instance four-wave-mixing and Raman scattering in the access waveguide and in the optical fibers in the setup): the SNR, as expected, decreases with increasing the pumping power, but it is always sufficiently high to grant entanglement. It is worth noticing that the values of the visibility reported in the table are obtained by a single fit operation on the raw data without performing any data correction, e. g. without subtracting the dark counts of the detectors). Finally, the maximum measurable visibility is limited by the first order visibility of the interferometers, in our setup , which gives the expected visibility (see the last column of Tab. I)

In conclusion, we have experimentally demonstrated a microstructured, CMOS-compatible source of entangled photons, operating at room temperature with unprecedented capabilities. While ring resonators have long been studied theoretically as a source of quantum correlated states, and pairs of photons emitted from spontaneous four-wave mixing in silicon ring resonators have been detected, with this work the oft-quoted promise that these devices could serve as sources of entangled photons has finally been fulfilled. We confirmed the violation of Bell’s inequality by more than seven standard deviations, and we demonstrated the generation of time-energy entangled photon pairs particularly relevant for telecommunication applications. The source has incomparable operating characteristics. The spectral brightness per coupled pump power is extremely high, at about 610 nmmWs. This is more than four order of magnitudes larger than that reported for entangled photon pairs emitted by long silicon waveguides Take_Pol (); Take (); Clemmen (). Even when compared to room temperature sources of entangled photons based on nonlinearities, which are typically not CMOS-compatible, the emission rate reported here is remarkable. It is two orders of magnitude larger than that obtained from GaAs based waveguides Ducci () for 1 mW of pumping power, and, for the given bandwidth, it is only a factor of 5-6 less than what can be obtained with centimeter long waveguides in periodically poled crystals Fujii (); our source has a footprint of less than a hundred square microns. This small footprint has great advantages for scalability: all the existing know-how of integrated photonics can be directly used with our source, and its micrometric size makes it ideal for integration with other devices on the same chip, e.g. integrated filters for the pump and routing of signal and idler, both functions well established in integrated photonics. Ring resonators are also a well established industrial standard, already used in modulators, for example. Here we have demonstrated a new, compelling functionality of ring resonators: they can be used as sources of entangled states of light. Their production readiness has an immediate large impact for application, much more than other structures characterised by larger nonlinearities but also a less mature integration PhM (). The signal and idler beams have a bandwidth of 13 GHz, which would allow their use in DWDM network systems without the need of any spectral filtering; the pump powers used here, on the order of dBm, are characteristic of that used in fiber networks; and the pump, signal, and idler frequencies lie in the telecommunications band. We can confidently expect that silicon mircoring resonators will become the dominant paradigm of correlated photon sources for quantum photonics, both for applications involving the transmission of quantum correlations over long distances, such as quantum cryptography, and for applications involving quantum information processing “on-a-chip”.

Vi Funding

This work was supported by MIUR funding through the FIRB ”Futuro in Ricerca” project RBFR08XMVY, from the foundation Alma Mater Ticinensis and by Fondazione Cariplo through project 2010-0523 Nanophotonics for thin-film photovoltaics. JES acknowledges support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. MJS and MS acknowledge support from the EPSRC, UK.

Vii Aknowledgements

We acknowledge the technical staff of the James Watt Nanofabrication Centre at Glasgow University.

See Supplementary Information for supporting content.

Appendix A Supplementary information for the manuscript “An integrated silicon source of time-energy entangled photons”

a.1 Sample fabrication

The devices were fabricated on a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer from SOITEC with a 220 nm-thick silicon core layer. The 5 mm-long and 500 nm-wide single-mode silicon waveguides for TE-polarized light were fabricated comprising spot-size converters (SSCs) for efficient input and output coupling. SSCs consist of 300 m-long silicon inverse tapers with a 20 nm tip width and 1.5 2.0 m polymer (SU8) waveguides. Ring resonators with radii of 5, 10, 20 and 30 m were fabricated side-coupled to a single bus waveguide at different coupling distances for each radius. The pattern of the silicon waveguide structures was defined in negative tone resist via electronic beam lithography, and then transferred into the silicon layer by using inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching. Polymer waveguide-couplers were written in SU8 material using a second e-beam lithography step. The silicon chip was finally coated with a protective PMMA layer. We chose a ring resonator with radius R=10 m and a coupling distance of 150 nm for the experiments reported in this paper based on its efficiency in the generation of photon pairs.

Appendix B Detailed experimental set-up

Figure 5, gives a detailed scheme of the actual setup we employed. Light from a tunable cw pump diode laser (Santec, TSL-510), whose wavelength can range through 1500-1630 nm, comes through a polarization maintaining (PM) single-mode optical fiber. The pump laser light is collimated to free-space by means of an aspheric lens and then it passes through a half wave plate (HWP) and some pass band interferometric filters (PBFs) to achieve more than 120 dB of side-band suppression at the frequency of the spontaneously generated photons. The collimated and filtered pump laser is then injected into the silicon wire waveguide (SWW) by means of a second aspheric lens, which focuses the beam to a diffraction limited spot (diameter 2 m) onto the waveguide’s edge. The HWP is turned to align the pump polarization to the TE-like single mode SWW. The sample has polymeric field mode converters to couple the silicon wire waveguides to the optical fibers.

Figure 5: Complete scheme of the experimental set-up. The acronyms stand for: PMF, polarization maintaining fiber; SMF, single mode fiber; BPF, band-pass filter; FP, fiber polarizer; Piezo, piezoelectric actuator.

The output from the sample is collected by a PM lens tapered fiber mounted on a high precision fiber rotator. In-coupling and out-coupling losses are estimated to be the same, and they sum up to a measured value of about 7 dB. Then two band pass filters (BPFs), tuned at the signal and idler frequencies, are employed at the output of a 50:50 fiber beam splitter in order to separate the signal from the idler.

b.1 Characterization and Four Wave Mixing measurements

Linear transmission spectra with a resolution of 5 pm were taken using a tunable continuous wave laser modulated through an optical chopper for injection and an InGaAs photodiode coupled to a lock-in amplifier for detection. The experimental setup used to test spontaneous four wave mixing uses a Santec TSL-510 tunable cw laser. Spectral filtering of the laser beam is performed before injection to filter out the fluorescence background emitted from the laser because of amplified spontaneous emission. The pump beam is collimated to free-space using an aspheric lens, its polarization is aligned to the TE-like single-mode of the silicon waveguide, and finally the pump light is coupled to the sample using an aspheric lens. The output from the sample is collected with a PM lensed-fiber mounted on a high-precision fiber rotator. The total insertion losses of the silicon chip are estimated around 7 dB. The output containing the transmitted pump beam and the photon pairs is sent, through a 50:50 fiber beam-splitter, to two band pass filters (BPF) tuned to the signal and idler frequencies in order to reject the remaining pump. Using a 50:50 fiber beam-combiner, the output of both band pass filters is finally conveyed to a monochromator coupled to a nitrogen-cooled CCD.

b.2 Measurement of the generation and output rates

The output rate was measured in an ad-hoc set-up: we calibrated the response of the LN-cooled CCD camera using a power-meter with sub-pW sensitivity, so that the CCD could be then used as a power-meter itself. Between the sample and the CCD we have placed only a filtering stage (to select only signal or idler photons and completely rejecting all other resonances including the pump). The insertion loss of the filtering stage was directly measured to be 3.5 dB. To extract the internal generation efficiency, we have back-traced this flux to the ring by adding an additional 3.5 dB of coupling losses (half of the 7 dB insertion loss of the whole sample).

b.3 Coincidence measurements

After the signal and idler filters, collimators couple the photons from the optical fibers to free space. Signal and idler photons then enter the two separate, equally unbalanced, Michelson interferometers. The path length difference is about cm, well above the coherence length of the generated photons ( mm). The mirrors on the short path of the interferometers are positioned using an open loop piezo actuator (Attocube series 101) with resolution better than 1 nm. The piezo actuator is connected to a computer-based feedback system that allows the stabilization of the interferometers and the control of their relative phase (see the next section). The collimated photons exiting from the interferometers are then coupled to two single mode fibers by which signal and idler photons are sent to two superconducting single photon detectors from Scontel.

Losses were directly measured for all components of the set-up. In-coupling and out-coupling losses of the sample are estimated to be the same, and they sum up to a measured value of about 7 dB. So the outcoupling losses from the sample are dB, then the beamsplitter introduces another dB, while losses from the filters have been measured to be dB. Since we are only collecting from one of the two outputs of each interferometer (with the second output coinciding with the input), half of the signal and idler photons are lost. Moreover, for every interferometer, nonunitary mirror reflectivity, beam splitter imperfections, and coupling losses from fiber to free-space, and viceversa, result in a total loss 10 dB for both the short and the long paths. Detector 1 has a detection efficiency of 10%, so dB, while detector 2 has a detection efficiency of 5%, so dB. In total we have a loss dB for signal photons, and a loss of dB for idler photons. The detected coincidence rate is then given by where is the internal generation rate, so on there is a loss of about 65 dB.

A very important condition to fulfill in a Franson type experiment is the following relation between the relevant time quantities: , where is the coherence time of signal and idler photos, is the time difference between the two paths of each interferometer, and is the pump laser coherence time. The second fundamental condition is that both interferometers must have the same path difference to within the coherence length of signal and idler photons. In order to align the path difference of the two interferometers we used the following procedure. The first interferometer (at Alice’s side) was aligned using a highly coherent laser beam. The second interferometer (at Bob’s side) is then roughly aligned (to within about one centimeter) by means of a measuring tape. Then, a pulsed laser (spectral width 8 nm, and pulse coherence time 0.5 ps) is injected in Alice’s interferometer whose output is connected in cascade to the input of Bob’s device. Finally, the output of Bob’s interferometer is sent to a slow detector. Then, the piezo actuator controlling Alice’s mirror is scanned with an excursion larger than the laser wavelength. Since the coherence length of the laser pump pulses ( 150 m) is much shorter than , interference arises when . Note the interference involves only two of the four paths a pump pulse can take, and thus its visibility is limited to 50 %. By maximizing the interference’s amplitude oscillation, we were able to set the same value of for both interferometers to within m, well below the coherence length on the generated photons (estimated to be about 3 mm).

b.4 Stabilization of the interferometers

Figure 6: Scheme of the stabilized interferometer comprising a control red beam and a target (measured) IR beam. The inset shows the transmission of the red and IR beams through the wedge beam-splitter, the effect is intentionally exaggerate to better show the effect.
Figure 7: (a) Interferometer output with and without the feedback as a function of the acquisition time. (b) Statistical distribution of the phase errors during the stabilization.

In order to verify time-energy entanglement between photon pairs produced by our silicon microring resonators, it is necessary to relate the coincidence rate at the output of two separate interferometers, while varying their phases and . The period length of the interference is about half the pump wavelength ( nm). Because of the sub micrometric period of the interference, together with the need of long integration time in coincidence measurements, environmental noise, due for example to thermal fluctuation or mechanical stresses on the optical table, can seriously affect the results of the measurement. This configuration therefore requires very accurate control and stabilization of the path length difference between the arms of each interferometer. To achieve this aim we have developed a new stabilization method by which it is possible to actively stabilize an interferometer at an arbitrary phase with sub-nanometric resolution. The scheme of our set-up is reported in Figure 6: a He:Ne laser (632.8 nm) (depicted in red in Figure 6) is used as a reference beam, while signal and idler photons follow the controlled IR beam path (in green). One of the two mirrors (M1) is slightly tilted and forms an angle with the plane P, which is parallel to the wavefront of the incoming light (-direction), so that the two parts of the reference laser beam traveling in the two arms exit the interferometer at a slightly different angle and the interfering beams are no more collinear. This angle results therefore in vertical spatial interference fringes along the -direction.

In order to obtain a collinear geometry on the controlled IR beam while preserving the spatial interference fringes along the -direction on the red reference beam, we injected the reference and controlled beams into the interferometer following two spatially separated parallel directions, and we employed a UV fused silica wedged (wedge angle: 30 arcmin) beam splitter, with an antireflection coating ranging from 600 nm to 1700 nm. The optical dispersion of silica (), together with the wedge angle, cause the transmitted beam of this beam splitter to exit with an angle dependent on its wavelength. Thus, if we adjust the mirror M1 on the transmitted arm (see Figure 6) such that it is perpendicular to the IR beam, this mirror reflects the red beam at a certain angle with respect to the incoming wave. Remembering that the mirror on the reflected arm is perpendicular to both beams, this leads to a spatial interference fringe for the reference beam, while the controlled beam conserves a homogeneous phase over its transverse area. In practice, the wedge angle of our beam splitter is sufficient to create about three spatial fringes on the red output beam.

The fringes on the reference beam are measured using a line CCD camera. The phase of the fringe pattern is directly correlated to the phase of the IR beam, so in essence this methods converts a temporal modulation to a spatial modulation. The camera signal is used as an input for PID control algorithm driving the piezo actuators in the interferometers. We have checked that the interferometers can be set and stabilized at an arbitrary phase. An example of stabilization is shown in Figure 7, where the phase has been kept stable for 48 hours and then the PID control algorithm was switched off. Analysis of the data confirms that both stability and positioning accuracy are about 0.8 nm, limited by the piezo positioning accuracy. This corresponds to a precision in phase of about one third of a degree, for the signal and idler wavelengths.

A full description of the stabilization method and further details can be found in Grassani et al. Optics Letters 39, 2530 (2014)..

b.5 SNR and visibility from the data

Levenberg-Marquardt nonlinear regression of the function


to the experimental data was performed using Mircocal Originlab plotting and analysis software; here is the sum of the phases of the two interferometers, while , and are the fit parameters. The measured visibility is extracted from the best fit of the experimental data:


where and are respectively the maxima and the minima of the curve. Since the value defined in (3) depends on the accidental counts of the measure, and the to the coincidences, we can express as a function of the signal to noise ratio SNR as follows:


where is the mean first order interference visibility of the interferometers, measured using a high coherence laser beam. The SNR can itself be extracted from the best fit parameters, . SNR can however be directly extracted from the measured coincidence curves: as the side peaks of the coincidence curves do not depend on , we can define


where is the count rate for events in which the signal photon has taken the long path and the idler photon has taken the short path in the interferometers (vice versa per ), while is the accidentals count rate. We have chosen to extract the SNR directly from the data as outlined equation 5: the obtained values are consistent with the SNR measured in direct coincidence experiments (i.e. without interferometers).

b.6 Error analysis

The errors are taken into account using standard error propagation theory. The statistical distribution of coincidence counts, including , and , is assumed to be Poissonian. The interferometers stabilization procedure lets us set the value of to better than 0.4, nonetheless we estimate the error on to be about 10 due to phase inhomogeneity on the beam profiles. The uncertainty on the derived quantities and is obtained from the fitting routine. The error on the visibility is thus:


The error on the SNR is


b.7 The full experimental dataset of figure 4 (e)

In the following two pages are all the coincidence curves measured for a coupled pump power of 1.5 mW (Fig. 4 in the main text). The curves are reported as measured from the event timer, without any treatment of the data (and thus with no error bars). The time window of 75 ps coincides with the time resolution of the detectors.


  1. Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000).
  2. Ekert, A. K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661-663 (1991).
  3. Curty, M., Lewenstein, M. & Lütkenhaus, N. Entanglement as a precondition for secure quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 217903 (2004)
  4. Jozsa, R. & Linden, N. On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational speed-up. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 459, 2011 (2003).
  5. Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. Quantum Cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computers, Systems and Signal Processing. 175-179 (IEEE,1984).
  6. Crespi, A. et al. Integrated photonic quantum gates for polarization qubits. Nature Commun. 2, 566 (2011).
  7. Metcalf, B. J. et al. Multiphoton quantum interference in a multiport integrated photonic device. Nat. Commun. 4, 1356 (2013).
  8. Shadbolt, P. J. et al. Generating, manipulating and measuring entanglement and mixture with a reconfigurable photonic circuit. Nature Photon. 6, 45-49 (2012).
  9. Silverstone, J.W. et al. On-chip quantum interference between silicon photon-pair sources. Nature Photon. 8, 104-108 (2014).
  10. Kwiat, P.G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4337-4341 (1995).
  11. Fujii, G., Namekata, N., Motoya, M., Kurimura, S. & Inoue, S. Bright narrowband source of photon pairs at optical telecommunication wavelengths using a type-II periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide. Opt. Express 15, 12769-12776 (2007).
  12. Matsuda, N. et al. A monolithically integrated polarization entangled photon pair source on a silicon chip. Sci. Rep. 2, 817 (2012).
  13. Olislager, L. et al. Silicon-on-insulator integrated source of polarization-entangled photons. Opt. Lett. 38, 1960-1962 (2013).
  14. Takesue, H. et al. Entanglement generation using silicon wire waveguide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 201108 (2007).
  15. Harada, K. et al. Generation of high-purity entangled photon pairs using silicon wire waveguide. Opt. Express 16, 20368-20373 (2008).
  16. Takesue, H., Matsuda, N., Kuramochi, E.& Masaya, N. Entangled photons from on-chip slow light. Sci. Rep. 4, 3913 (2014).
  17. Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Zbinden, H. and Gisin, N. Quantum Cryptography Using Entangled Photons in Energy-Time Bell States. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4737-4740 (2000).
  18. Marcikic, I. et al. Distribution of time-bin entangled qubits over 50 km of optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 180502 (2004).
  19. Mower, J. et al. High-dimensional quantum key distribution using dispersive optics Phys. Rev. A 87, 062322 (2013)
  20. Davanço, M. et al. Telecommunications-band heralded single photons from a silicon nanophotonic chip Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 261104 (2012).
  21. Azzini, S. et al. Stimulated and spontaneous four-wave mixing in silicon-on-insulator coupled photonic wire nano-cavities Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 031117 (2013).
  22. Almeida, V. R., Barrios, C. A., Panepucci, R. R. & Lipson, M. All-optical control of light on a silicon chip. Nature 431, 1081-1084 (2004).
  23. Clemmen, S. et al. Continuous wave photon pair generation in silicon-on-insulator waveguides and ring resonators. Opt. Express 17, 16558-16570 (2009).
  24. Sharping, J. E. et al. Generation of correlated photons in nanoscale silicon waveguides. Opt. Express 14 12388-12393 (2006).
  25. Xiong, C. et al. Slow-light enhanced correlated photon pair generation in a silicon photonic crystal waveguide. Opt. Lett. 36, 3413-3415 (2011).
  26. Azzini, S. et al. Ultra-low power generation of twin photons in a compact silicon ring resonator. Opt. Express 20, 23100-23107 (2012).
  27. Engin, E. et al. Photon pair generation in a silicon micro-ring resonator with reverse bias enhancement. Opt. Express 21, 27826-27834 (2013).
  28. Azzini, S. et al. From Classical Four-Wave Mixing to Parametric Fluorescence in Silicon micro-ring resonators. Opt. Lett. 37, 3807-3809 (2012).
  29. Marcikic, I., et al. Time-bin entangled qubits for quantum communication created by femtosecond pulses Phys. Rev. A 66, 062308 (2002).
  30. Franson, J. D. Bell Inequality for Position and Time. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2205-2208 (1989).
  31. J. D. Franson ”Two photon interferometry over large distances.” Phys. Rev. A 44, 4552 (1991).
  32. Kwiat, P. G., Steinberg, A. M. & Chiao, R. Y. High-visibility interference in a Bell-inequality experiment for energy and time. Phys. Rev. A 47, R2472-R2475 (1993).
  33. Grassani, D., Galli, M., Bajoni, D. Active stabilization of a Michelson interferometer at an arbitrary phase with subnanometer resolution. Opt. Lett. 39, 2530-2533 (2014).
  34. Orieux, A. et al. Direct Bell States Generation on a III-V Semiconductor Chip at Room Temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 160502 (2013).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description