FIRST/SDSS BL Lacs

A Large Sample of BL Lacs from SDSS and FIRST

Abstract

We present a large sample of 501 radio-selected BL Lac candidates from the combination of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 5 optical spectroscopy and from the Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty-Centimeters (FIRST) radio survey; this is one of the largest BL Lac samples yet assembled, and each object emerges with homogeneous data coverage. Each candidate is detected in the radio from FIRST and confirmed in SDSS optical spectroscopy to have: (1) no emission feature with measured rest equivalent width larger than 5 Å; and (2) no measured Ca ii H/K depression larger than 40%. We subdivide our sample into 426 higher confidence candidates and 75 lower confidence candidates. We argue that contamination from other classes of objects that formally pass our selection criteria is small, and we identify a few very rare radio AGN with unusual spectra that are probably related to broad absorption line quasars. About one-fifth of our sample were known BL Lacs prior to the SDSS. A preliminary analysis of the sample generally supports the standard beaming paradigm. While we recover sizable numbers of low-energy and intermediate-energy cutoff BL Lacs (LBLs and IBLs, respectively), there are indications of a potential bias toward recovering high-energy cutoff BL Lacs (HBLs) from SDSS spectroscopy. Such a large sample may eventually provide new constraints on BL Lac unification models and their potentially peculiar cosmic evolution; in particular, our sample contains a significant number of higher redshift objects, a sub-population for which the standard paradigm has yet to be rigorously constrained.

Subject headings:
BL Lacertae objects:general —galaxies:active — quasars:general — surveys
10

1. Introduction

BL Lacs are a rare subclass of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) characterized by nearly featureless optical spectra, multiwavelength emission, marked variability and strong polarization (e.g., see Blandford & Rees, 1978; Kollgaard, 1994; Urry & Padovani, 1995; Perlman et al., 2001). Their spectral energy distributions (SEDs) tend to be dominated by synchrotron radiation, with a component due to inverse Compton scattering at higher frequencies. The standard paradigm describes BL Lacs in the context of AGN unification as FR I radio galaxies with their relativistic jets pointed toward the observer (e.g., Blandford & Rees, 1978). In this scenario the observed jets are brightened through beaming effects, making BL Lacs powerful probes of AGN jet physics and radio-loud AGN in general. Their rarity and lack of strong spectral features historically render many traditional quasar selection techniques (e.g., UV-excess or objective prism surveys) inefficient. Still, large BL Lac samples are eagerly sought but until relatively recently have remained elusive; given their strong multiwavelength continuous emission and rarity, broad-band recovery methods over large regions of the sky tend to be the most efficient.

BL Lac studies are sensitive to selection biases and historically have been limited by small number statistics. For example, a now disfavored dichotomy between radio selected BL Lacs (RBLs) and X-ray selected BL Lacs (XBLs) was initially suggested from a comparison between the small and relatively shallow but complete 1 Jy radio sample (Stickel et al., 1991) and an X-ray selected sample from the Einstein Observatory Extended Medium-Sensitivity Survey (EMSS; Stocke et al., 1991). In addition to XBLs appearing to have less rapid variability and smaller nuclear to host galaxy flux ratios, RBLs and XBLs were thought to populate distinctly different regions of parameter space (e.g., see Figure 5 of Padovani & Giommi, 1995b). XBLs are also more weakly polarized on average, and the majority of XBLs have constant polarization position angles (within 20) over timescales of at least 3 years (Jannuzi et al., 1994).

But Padovani & Giommi (1995b) argue against two distinct BL Lac populations, and they instead propose that the observed differences between RBLs and XBLs could be explained via different energy cutoffs in the beamed synchrotron radiation component of their SEDs. They suggest a more physical naming scheme of low-energy cutoff BL Lac (LBL) and high-energy cutoff BL Lac (HBL) to replace RBL and XBL. LBLs have energy cutoffs in the near-infrared/optical, while HBLs have energy cutoffs in the UV/X-ray. Most but not all RBLs are LBLs in this scenario, and similarly most XBLs are HBLs. Deeper surveys have subsequently found many objects, aptly named intermediate-energy cutoff BL Lacs (IBL), that bridge this LBL/HBL gap (e.g., Kock et al., 1996; Perlman et al., 1996; Laurent-Muehleisen et al., 1999; Collinge et al., 2005), thereby demonstrating the apparent dichotomy’s emergence as a selection effect. However, any model advocating a single BL Lac population is still challenged with explaining the phenomenological differences between RBLs and XBLs described in the previous paragraph.

Large and deep samples are clearly essential for advancing our knowledge on BL Lacs (e.g., see Padovani & Giommi, 1995b; Perlman et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2006), and much progress has been made over the past 10-15 years: the number of known BL Lacs has ballooned from only a couple hundred (Padovani & Giommi, 1995a) to about 1100 catalogued in Véron-Cetty & Véron (2006). Numerous selection techniques have been used to assemble sizable BL Lac samples. One multifrequency selection approach identifies candidates based on flat radio spectra, followed by requisite optical spectroscopy (e.g., Kühr & Schmidt, 1990; Stickel et al., 1991; Marchã et al., 1996; Caccianiga et al., 2002b), while another popular technique assembles catalogs via the indentification of optical counterparts to radio and/or X-ray error circles in various surveys (e.g., Stocke et al., 1991; Wolter et al., 1997; Bade et al., 1998; Fischer et al., 1998; Laurent-Muehleisen et al., 1998; Maccacaro et al., 1998; Laurent-Muehleisen et al., 1999; Perlman et al., 1998; Caccianiga et al., 1999; Brinkmann et al., 2000; Landt et al., 2001; Caccianiga et al., 2002a; Beckmann et al., 2003; Padovani et al., 2007). While these combined radio/X-ray selected samples include a significant fraction of IBLs in addition to LBLs and HBLs, they are of course sensitive to the varying flux limits and biases inherent to each multiwavelength survey.

One practical limitation to recovering a large uniform sample from imaging surveys as described above is performing the necessary optical spectroscopic follow-up for (easily) thousands of candidates, among which only are typically actual BL Lacs. It has been noted that BL Lacs tend to have characteristic X-ray-to-optical and optical-to-radio flux ratios differentiating them (at least statistically) from other radio/X-ray sources (e.g., Stocke et al., 1989, 1991; Nass et al., 1996). This feature has been exploited to increase the efficiency of BL Lac search algorithms by targeting radio/X-ray sources with broad-band flux ratios indicative of known BL Lacs. Notably, the Einstein Slew Survey (Perlman et al., 1996) and the Sedentary Multifrequency Survey (Giommi et al., 1999, 2005; Piranomonte et al., 2007) adopted this approach to recover large uniform BL Lac samples (60 in the case of the Einstein survey and 150 in the final Sedentary sample.) While such broad-band color selection approaches can recover LBLs, IBLs and HBLs, it has been noted that the broad-band SED of BL Lacs can vary largely from object to object, and this selection approach is prone to missing some BL Lac subpopulations potentially in large numbers (Laurent-Muehleisen, 1997; Laurent-Muehleisen et al., 1999). It should be noted however that the Einstein Slew Survey produced the first large BL Lac sample containing a sizable number of LBLs, IBLs and HBLs from a single selection technique; the Sedentary sample intentionally only attempted to recover HBLs, and it nicely complements other surveys more sensitive to LBLs (particularly the Deep X-ray Radio Blazar Survey; Perlman et al., 1998; Landt et al., 2001; Padovani et al., 2007)

The recent advent of digital large scale spectroscopic optical surveys has eased the difficulties of optical follow-up incurred by previous BL Lac surveys. A purely optically selected sample was assembled from the 2df and 6df quasar surveys (Londish et al., 2007), and Collinge et al. (2005) additionally recovered hundreds of optically spectroscopically selected BL Lac candidates from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS, York et al., 2000). These optically selected samples do not entirely rule out the existence of radio-quiet BL Lacs; however, if such a population exists they must be extremely rare (e.g., see Stocke et al., 1990).

The 10 currently known BL Lacs were derived from many different surveys, each with slightly different selection criteria and biases. In this paper, we present a 501 object radio sample with homogeneous data coverage selected jointly from the SDSS and from the Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty-Centimeters (FIRST, Becker et al., 1995) survey. This sample is one of the largest BL Lac samples yet assembled. We also recently published in Anderson et al. (2007) a 266 object X-ray sample selected jointly from SDSS spectroscopy and from the Rosat All Sky Survey (RASS, Voges et al., 1999, 2000). Our X-ray sample recovered LBLs, IBLs and HBLs, and a post-selection correlation with FIRST and the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) revealed only 7 objects currently lacking radio detections (possibly, but not certainly, because their radio emission lies below the FIRST/NVSS catalog flux limits.) Both our separate SDSS/FIRST and SDSS/RASS samples are large with similar systematics given their similar recovery methods in SDSS. These samples therefore provide an interesting opportunity for comparing radio and X-ray selected BL Lacs in a uniform manner. The sheer size of our SDSS/FIRST sample, when supplemented by a rigorous understanding of selection biases among the different wavebands, may eventually permit application to a range of BL Lac topics, from AGN unification, to host galaxy properties, to BL Lac evolution.

Our purpose here is to present our radio selected sample with some preliminary analysis. We defer detailed investigations and comparisons with other samples to a later paper. In §2 we present our selection criteria. Potential contaminants to our sample are discussed in §3, and our catalog is given in §4. Some preliminary results and future applications of our sample are discussed in §5, with a summary in §6. Throughout we use  km s Mpc, and .

2. Sample Selection

We select BL Lac candidates from the combination of the SDSS Data Release 5 (DR5) spectroscopic database (Adelman-McCarthy et al., 2007) in the optical, and from the FIRST survey catalog (Becker et al., 1995) in the radio. The SDSS is a multi-institutional effort to image  deg of the north galactic cap in 5 optical filters covering 3800 to 10,000 Å (e.g., see Fukugita et al., 1996; Gunn et al., 1998), with follow-up moderate resolution spectroscopy () of 10 galaxies, 10 QSOs, and 10 unusual stars (e.g., see York et al., 2000). Data is taken with a special purpose 2.5-meter telescope located at Apache Point Observatory (see Gunn et al., 2006), with astrometric accuracy at the 100 milli-arcsec level at the survey limit of  (Pier et al., 2003) and typical photometric precision of approximately 0.02-0.03 mag (Ivezić et al., 2004); 640 simultaneous spectra are obtained over a 7 deg field with a multifiber optical spectrograph. Further technical details can be found in Stoughton et al. (2002). The SDSS DR5 spectroscopic database contains spectra for  objects over  deg, and the DR5 Quasar Catalog (Schneider et al., 2007) contains 77,429 quasars with reliable spectroscopic redshifts. Our selection process identifies a very small fraction of objects () in the DR5 Quasar Catalog as BL Lacs (see §4).

The FIRST radio survey imaged approximately the same 10 deg of the North Galactic Cap in the VLA’s B configuration (5 resolution) at 1.4 GHz. Three-minute snapshots were co-added together, and sources were extracted via specialized algorithms (see White et al., 1997) with a catalog flux limit of 1 mJy and positional uncertainties better than . The FIRST survey is by design well suited both in sky coverage and depth for matching optical counterparts in SDSS, and about one-third of FIRST sources have detectable optical counterparts in the SDSS photometric survey (Kimball & Ivezić, 2008). There are 37,456 objects in the SDSS DR5 spectroscopic database that are flagged as FIRST radio sources.

The target selection algorithms for follow-up SDSS spectroscopy are well suited for recovering BL Lacs. Please refer to Anderson et al. (2003) for a thorough discussion. Briefly, one goal of the SDSS is to identify optical counterparts to 10 RASS X-ray sources. At least one source with  or  within many RASS error circles is targeted for spectroscopy. This X-ray counterpart algorithm targets many BL Lacs, as sources whose SDSS positions additionally match within 2 to a FIRST source are given highest priority, followed by objects with quasar-like or otherwise strange SDSS colors. The SDSS spectroscopic sample is even more advantageous for BL Lac recovery in that BL Lac spectra are additionally obtained through other quasar, serendipity, or galaxy spectroscopic target selection algorithms (see Eisenstein et al., 2001; Richards et al., 2002; Strauss et al., 2002).

Although one might initially expect that our emphasis on radio detection for inclusion would bias our sample toward excess LBLs, we do not believe this is an important concern. It is true that by requiring a detection in FIRST we are prone to missing some BL Lacs. For example, some regions of the sky might not have data coverage in FIRST; and, some BL Lacs with SDSS spectroscopy might have been in a low flux state during the FIRST observations and would therefore be missed; also, we are not highly sensitive to the radio-weak/quiet tail of the BL Lac population. While very interesting, radio-weak/quiet BL Lacs must be extremely rare if they exist (e.g., see Stocke et al., 1990; Londish et al., 2007); omission of a few would not affect our sample in a statistical sense. However, most BL Lacs at the faint flux limit for SDSS spectroscopy (, , or ) will have radio fluxes larger than the 1 mJy flux limit of the FIRST survey at 1.4 GHz. Figure 1 shows typical SEDs for an LBL, an IBL, and an HBL (SEDs were kindly provided by Elina Nieppola, see Nieppola et al., 2006) as a solid line, dotted line, and dashed line respectively; the SEDs are normalized to . Overplotted as black squares with arrows are typical flux limits for FIRST, SDSS spectroscopy, and RASS from left to right, respectively. So, while it is likely there are some BL Lacs with SDSS spectroscopy not detected in FIRST, we do not appear to be significantly biasing our sample toward or against one particular BL Lac subclass by applying the radio flux limit to our selection criteria. Note, however, that applying the RASS flux limit (taken from Anderson et al. 2007 as 2.510 erg s cm from 0.1-2.4 keV) would bias our sample toward HBLs. While we do not explicitly apply this flux limit, it does play a role in determining which objects are targeted for SDSS spectroscopy. Therefore, objects in BL Lac samples derived from SDSS spectroscopy could be biased toward HBLs (see §5 and also Collinge et al. 2005). The relatively higher RASS flux limit could also explain why we recover almost twice as many BL Lac candidates from FIRST/SDSS as Anderson et al. (2007) did from RASS/SDSS over the same area of the sky.

Figure 1.— Average SEDs for LBLs (solid line), IBLs (dotted line), and HBLs (dashed line) in Nieppola et al. (2006), normalized to  mag. Approximate flux limits for FIRST in the radio (1 mJy at 1.4 GHz), SDSS spectroscopy in the optical (), and RASS in the X-ray (2.510 erg s cm from 0.1-2.4 keV, see Anderson et al. 2007) are shown as squares with arrows from left to right, respectively. At the optical spectroscopic flux limit, we do not expect to miss many BL Lacs by imposing a radio flux limit, unless the SDSS object does not overlap with the FIRST survey’s sky coverage, or if the object was in a low flux state during the FIRST observations. Note that applying the RASS flux limit could bias our sample toward HBLs. Although we do not formally impose an X-ray flux limit to our sample, the RASS flux limit is implicit in the SDSS spectroscopic target algorithms. The RASS flux limit therefore could affect the makeup of our sample (see §5). Our conclusion remains unchanged if we choose to normalize each SED to  or .

2.1. Selection Criteria

Following the process detailed below, we impose the following criteria for BL Lac selection: 1) the SDSS position matches within 2 to a FIRST radio source; 2) SDSS spectroscopy shows no emission line with a rest-frame equivalent width () larger than 5 Å (see §2.4); and 3) the Ca ii H/K break (if present) has a measured depression . The Ca ii H/K depression parameter describes the fractional change in continuum blueward and redward of 4000 Å (e.g., see Landt et al., 2002):

where  and  refer to the average fluxes per unit frequency just blueward (3750-3950 Å) and just redward (4050-4250 Å) of the H/K break respectively. The quantities  and  similarly refer to the average fluxes per unit wavelength. These spectral constraints are commonly used in the recent literature, and they are consistent with, albeit more restrictive than, those introduced by Marchã et al. (1996). We also take additional precautions to reject objects that might formally pass these criteria but are not BL Lacs (e.g., stars, post-starburst galaxies, obvious broad absorption line quasars, etc.; see §3).

We note that our adopted selection criteria are empirically based and thus somewhat arbitrary (e.g., see Rector et al. 1999 and Caccianiga et al. 1999 for relevant discussions pertaining to selection issues). For example, there is no definitive Ca ii H/K break value that serves as an obvious transition between beamed and unbeamed radio galaxies. And, we could be missing some nearby low-luminosity BL Lacs, as described by the Browne-Marchã effect (Browne & Marchã, 1993; Marchã & Browne, 1995): weakly beamed BL Lacs could be so dominated by starlight from their host galaxies that they are misidentified as radio galaxies or as clusters of galaxies.11 We discuss potential contamination from radio galaxies and clusters of galaxies in sections 3.3 and 3.4 respectively. Also, BL Lacs with significant host galaxy contamination can have ’s that are measured to be larger than 5 Å when referenced to their starlight contaminated continua instead of only their AGN continua (Marchã et al., 1996). Our selection approach misses such objects. Despite these well-studied issues, our adopted spectral criteria are also commonly applied in much of the recent literature.

2.2. Initial Query of the SDSS Database

The SDSS pipeline’s measurements of spectral features (e.g., redshifts, line equivalent widths, H/K breaks, etc.) are of course only useful if the pipeline estimates the correct redshift. The pipeline redshifts are quite reliable for objects with strong spectral features (e.g., over 98% of the pipeline redshifts were accurate for the objects in the DR5 Quasar Catalog), but one should not blindly trust the redshifts for such weak-featured objects as BL Lacs. We therefore placed lenient restrictions on our initial database query to ensure high completeness at the cost of an initially large false positive rate. We ran the following two-part query (followed by manual inspection of all SDSS spectra, see §2.4):

  1. We return all SDSS spectra within 2 of a FIRST source for which the pipeline has little confidence in the measured redshift. This is achieved by selecting all spectra (that are not blank sky for calibration) that the database flags SPECZSTATUS as `not_measured' or `failed'. This query returned 589 spectra.

  2. For those objects with more confident pipeline redshifts (i.e., SPECZSTATUS  `not_measured' or `failed'), we return all spectra within 2 to a FIRST source with the conservative constraints that (i) no emission line (of Ly, C iv, C iii], Mg ii, H, [O ii], or H) has a pipeline measured  Å, and (ii) the H/K break (if present) has a pipeline measured . This query returned 1803 spectra. Not every spectrum in this set has a reliable pipeline redshift. However, as expected, essentially all spectra lacking reliable pipeline redshifts also have very weak spectral features, and our query correctly retains these objects. Objects with spectral features too strong to be considered BL Lacs have correct pipeline redshifts in the vast majority of cases and are therefore rejected by the query as intended.

Out of 37,000 total FIRST matches in the DR5 spectroscopic database, our query yielded 2392 spectra as potential BL Lac candidates. We do not consider X-ray information for selection. However, if an SDSS source matches within  to a RASS source, we also keep track of its X-ray properties listed in the DR5 database.

Database Query Completeness and Efficiency

We run two tests to check that our database query returns the vast majority of previously-known SDSS BL Lacs. First, we compare our query results to Collinge et al. (2005)’s 183 probable SDSS optically selected BL Lac candidates that are additionally flagged as FIRST radio sources in their catalog. Collinge et al. similarly require  and  Å, but their exact recovery method differs from ours. 172 of their 183 FIRST/SDSS objects appear in the DR5 database as FIRST sources and pass our signal-to-noise cut (see §2.3). Of these 172 sources, our database query fails to recover only a single spectrum. We miss this spectrum because the pipeline measured a REW larger than 10 Å for an assumed Mg ii feature that is likely just noise.

Second, we perform an identical query for X-ray selection by replacing the 2 match to a FIRST source with a 1 positional match to a RASS source. We then compare results from this X-ray query to the Anderson et al. (2007) SDSS/RASS X-Ray selected AGN sample. Anderson et al. queried the DR5 spectroscopic database for SDSS spectra that matched within 1 to a RASS source, placing no additional constraints on the pipeline measured spectral feature strengths or redshift flags. Their manual inspection of the resulting 15,129 spectra yielded 266 X-ray selected BL Lac candidates (also defined by  Å and ). Our revamped X-ray query (i.e., including cuts on equivalent width and H/K break) weeds the 10 SDSS/RASS positional coincidences in DR5 to 2000 objects; we recovered all but 3 spectra included in the Anderson et al. BL Lac sample. The missed objects include a borderline BL Lac candidate with  exactly (as measured by Anderson et al.; the SDSS pipeline measured ), and two examples where the pipeline overestimated a single emission line’s  because the line lies in an abnormally noisy spectral regime.

Although our database query is by design inefficient, we conclude that it is excellent in producing a manageable number of candidates while retaining essentially all previously-identified BL Lac objects in the DR5 spectroscopic database.

2.3. SDSS Spectral Signal-to-Noise Cut

We apply a signal-to-noise cut to the SDSS spectra of potential BL Lacs, similar to Collinge et al. (2005). We calculate the signal to noise over three separate 500 Å wavelength regions centered on 4750, 6250, and 7750 Å (each wavelength region typically contains approximately 450, 350 and 300 pixels respectively); these spectral regions are typically high-quality and fall within the  and  filters respectively. Over each spectral region we calculate the signal (S) and the noise (N) such that , where  and  represent the flux density and the estimated uncertainty in each spectral element  respectively. We retain all objects with  in at least one of these spectral regions. This constraint roughly corresponds to fiber magnitudes , , or for a typical spectroscopic plate, and it truncates our list from 2392 to 1560 objects.

2.4. Manual Inspection of SDSS Spectra

We manually inspect the remaining 1560 spectra, including visual verification that our cut did indeed only reject objects with poor signal to noise. First, we flag each pipeline measured redshift as either reliable, as tentative, as a lower limit, or as bad. We define reliable pipeline redshifts as those based on at least two spectral features at the same pipeline redshift. Tentative pipeline redshifts are defined as those showing either only a single spectral feature, typically an emission line assumed to be Mg ii, or showing multiple weak yet potentially real spectral features at the same pipeline redshift. For spectra only showing absorption features typically associated with intergalactic medium absorption lines (i.e., doublets like Mg ii 2796,2803, Fe ii 2374,2382, etc.), we assign redshifts equal to the lower limit derived from the absorption feature and mark those objects’ redshifts as lower limits. Note that these objects could have redshifts equal to the limit values. Bad pipeline redshifts either show no spectral features, or the pipeline simply assigned an incorrect redshift (as judged in the visual verification process). For objects with tentative and bad pipeline redshifts, we attempt to find a redshift that fits the spectrum better than the pipeline redshift. If we find a better redshift (i.e., 2 spectral features at the same redshift,) then we change that spectrum’s redshift status to reliable. The small number of spectra that show only a single emission line are assigned tentative redshifts assuming the lone emission is Mg ii. Remaining objects with bad pipeline redshifts are then reclassified as having unknown redshifts.

For spectra with reliable and tentative redshifts we measure the strongest emission line’s  with IRAF12, retaining all objects for which this line’s  Å (assuming tentative redshifts are correct.) A handful of objects with redshift lower limits from intervening absorption show a single emission feature; we measure this emission feature’s  assuming the limit value is the correct redshift. We fit any blended lines with multiple Gaussian components as needed. We do however reject candidates with H/[N ii] complexes that show broad H, even if our deblended line measurements show components with  Å, under the assumption that we underestimate the H line flux and overestimate the [N ii] line flux. Most objects with tentative redshifts have such weak features that they undeniably pass the equivalent width cut, especially since they tend to have observed-frame equivalent widths  Å. Exceptions might be the small number of spectra that show only a single emission line. For these objects, we estimate rest-frame  by assuming the lone emission is Mg ii . Objects with adequate  but unknown redshifts pass our equivalent width cut almost by definition. For objects with reliable, tentative, or lower limit redshifts, we remeasure the Ca ii H/K break parameter  (if present) through an automated process, rejecting all objects with measured (assuming tentative redshifts and derived lower limits are correct.) We also examine the SDSS finding charts of each surviving object to ensure none are obviously blended or contaminated by a nearby object.

Finally, we classify each remaining object as either a higher confidence BL Lac candidate (‘BL’) or as a lower confidence BL Lac candidate (‘BL?’). We require objects classified as ‘BL’ to have slightly higher quality spectra, that is  in at least one of the three spectral regions described in §2.3. Objects can be classified as ‘BL?’ for any of the following reasons: (1) the largest calculated , as described in §2.3, has ; (2) the spectrum passes all criteria, but the object appears close enough to another bright object in its SDSS finding chart that flux contamination of the fiber spectrum might be a concern; or (3) it is unclear where to define the continuum near an emission line, and the line’s  is measured as larger or smaller than 5 Å depending on the continuum choice. We classify 426 objects as ‘BL’ and 75 as ‘BL?’. Some sample spectra for objects classified as ‘BL’ and ‘BL?’ are shown in Figures 2 and 3 respectively.

Figure 2.— Four sample spectra of higher confidence BL Lac candidates, boxcar smoothed with a width of 9. All 4 objects are additionally X-ray emitters. Top left: SDSS J082814.20415351.9, an example candidate with a reliable redshift () and prominent host galaxy contamination (Ca ii H/K depression ). Top right: SDSS J111757.24535554.9, an example of a nearly featureless object with a lower limit redshift () derived from absorption doublets. Here, absorption lines from Fe ii  and Mg ii  are all observed at the redshift quoted above. Most objects in our sample with redshifts derived from absorption doublets typically only show a single absorption feature. Bottom left: SDSS J115034.75415440.1, an example of a featureless object with unknown redshift. Bottom right: SDSS J120412.11114555.4, an example of a candidate with a reliable redshift () and moderate host galaxy contamination (). We are careful not to reject objects based on weak features near night sky lines such as 5577 Å.
Figure 3.— Four sample spectra of lower confidence BL Lac candidates, boxcar smoothed with a width of 9. Top left: SDSS J082801.14231217.6, classified as ‘BL?’ due to low signal-to-noise. This source has an unknown redshift and does not match to an X-ray source. Top right: SDSS J095507.88355100.8, potentially shows moderate host galaxy contamination () at a tentative redshift . This object is classified as ‘BL?’ due to low signal-to-noise, and it has an X-ray match in RASS. Bottom left: SDSS J132558.94411500.3, shows moderate host galaxy contamination () at a reliable redshift . This source is classified as ‘BL?’ because a broad H feature can have  larger or smaller than 5 Å depending on the continuum level chosen near the feature. This source has an X-ray match in RASS. Bottom right: SDSS J165329.09370511.4, classified as ‘BL?’ due to low signal-to-noise. This source has a tentative redshift () and does not have an X-ray match in RASS.

2.5. Luminosity and Broad-Band Spectral Index Calculations

We estimate rest-frame monochromatic luminosities per unit frequency in the radio, optical and X-ray at 5 GHz, 5000 Å, and 1 keV, respectively. We adopt a radio spectral index , the average of the 1 Jy radio sample (Stickel et al., 1991); and we assume  in the optical (typical of Collinge et al. 2005’s probable BL Lac candidates) and  in the X-ray (a value approximately intermediate between LBLs and HBLs, Sambruna et al., 1996; Sambruna, 1997). All spectral indices are defined as . We choose the above reference frequencies and spectral indices for consistency with the bulk of the literature.

Radio flux densities at 1.4 GHz are taken from the integrated FIRST flux densities in the SDSS database. The SDSS filter that includes 5000 Å in each object’s rest frame is used to estimate optical flux densities. We assume tentative and lower limit redshifts are correct, and we use the  filter for spectra with unknown redshifts (as 5000 Å would fall in the  filter at the median redshift of our sample.) Extinction corrected magnitudes (using the Schlegel et al. 1998 dust maps) are converted to flux densities using a zero-point of 3631 Jy and effective wavelengths 4686, 6165, 7481, and 8931 Å for , , , and  respectively. We use point spread function (psf) magnitudes to reduce potential host galaxy contamination in our optical luminosity calculations, but we note that we might still be overestimating optical luminosities for some nuclei.

For the X-ray, we use the Stark et al. (1992) H i maps and the colden tool in CIAO (Fruscione et al., 2006) to estimate the hydrogen column density along each sightline. We then use these column densities and the Portable, Interactive Multi-Mission Simulator (PIMMS, Mukai, 1993) to convert ROSAT PSPC X-ray count rates to absorbed and unabsorbed broad-band (0.1-2.4 keV) fluxes. For each spectrum lacking an X-ray detection we estimate its RASS exposure time as the exposure time for the X-ray source in the RASS catalog closest to the SDSS source’s position. Upper limits on RASS count rates are then set as 6 counts (the limit for inclusion in the RASS faint source catalog, Voges et al., 2000) divided by the exposure time, and limits on X-ray fluxes are calculated as described above.

Monochromatic luminosities are then calculated from the above radio and optical flux densities and the unabsorbed X-ray fluxes, assigning a redshift z=0.297 (the median reliable redshift of our 426 higher confidence candidates) to objects with unknown redshifts. We then calculate the broad-band spectral indices , , and .13 Throughout, we make no attempt to correct luminosities for the effects of relativistic beaming.

3. Possible Sources of Contaminants

3.1. Positional Coincidences

We have very little contamination from random mismatches between SDSS and FIRST source positions. Figure 4 (top) shows differences between SDSS and FIRST positions for our 501 BL Lac candidates. Becker et al. (1995) find FIRST positions to be accurate to at the 90% confidence level, and  of our SDSS/FIRST BL Lac candidates have SDSS source positions within  of the FIRST radio position. While X-ray emission is not a criterion for inclusion in our sample, the bottom panel of Figure 4 pleasantly confirms that we have a low false X-ray match rate as well: of our 230 X-ray matches, 89% have positional differences less than . This is consistent with expectations from Voges et al. (1999), who find 90% of objects in the RASS catalog with stellar optical counterparts to have X-ray source positions within  of the optical counterparts’ positions.

As another test on the level of contamination, we recorrelate all 501 BL Lac candidates to the FIRST and RASS catalogs after randomly offsetting the SDSS source positions by up to  and  respectively (i.e., 10 times the corresponding match radii.) We perform the recorrelation 10 times, requiring each offset to be larger than each match radius. On average we obtain only 6 random matches to a FIRST or to a RASS source in each offsetting test, reaffirming a very low level of potential contamination () due to positional mismatches.

Figure 4.— Top panel: differences between SDSS and FIRST source positions for all 501 BL Lac candidates; 95% of objects have SDSS postitions within  of each FIRST position. Bottom panel: differences between SDSS and RASS source positions for the 230 candidates with X-ray detections; 89% of objects with X-ray detections have SDSS positions within  of each RASS position. These percentages are consistent with little contamination from positional mismatches between FIRST, SDSS, and RASS.

3.2. Radio Stars

Since our database queries do not include cuts on absorption features other than Ca ii H/K break strength, we need to remove potential stellar contaminants during manual inspection of the spectra. Manual inspection revealed hundreds of radio stars of various spectral classes identified via common stellar features consistent with zero redshift. Most of these objects would formally fulfill our BL Lac selection criteria, but they are rejected since they clearly possess stellar spectra. We defer substantive discussion of the radio emitting stars for a later publication. As an example however, we show the spectrum of a previously known cataclysmic variable (FIRST J102347.6003841, Bond et al., 2002) in the top left panel of Figure 5 that was rejected during manual inspection based on emission line strength.

To test the potential level of stellar contamination in our final sample, we examine proper motion information from the SDSS+USNO-B proper motion catalog (Munn et al., 2004). Proper motions are available for 60% of our sample, and we assume objects with proper motion information are representative of the rest of our sample. Munn et al. (2004) find 95% of a sub-sample of spectroscopically confirmed quasars with  in the SDSS+USNO-B catalog to have proper motions  milli-arcsec year. Figure 6 shows a histogram of proper motions for 279 BL Lac candidates with proper motion detections and ;  show  milli-arcsec year. About half of our BL Lac candidates with measured  milli-arcsec year have reliable or tentative redshifts. We therefore do not believe galactic sources to be important contaminants to our final sample.

We list 13 BL Lac candidates with large cataloged proper motions ( milli-arcsec yr) and unknown redshifts in Table 1. We give object names in column (1), our classifications as a higher confidence (‘BL’) or lower confidence (‘BL?’) candidate in column (2), the measured proper motions (in milli-arcsec yr) from the SDSS DR5 database in column (3), psf-magnitudes in the  filter in column (4), and integrated radio fluxes from FIRST in mJy in column (5). Only one object (SDSS J094432.33+573536.1) has an X-ray detection in RASS. These sources could potentially be unusually featureless radio stars, and they deserve careful follow-up, such as, for example, proper motion measurements with very long baseline interferometry. We do not reject these sources, however, since we do not have proper motion information for every SDSS object and the number of objects with large proper motion measurements is consistent with random expectations from Munn et al. (2004).

SDSS Name Class. Radio Flux
(J2000) (marcsec/yr) (mag) (mJy)
075547.72432744.7 BL? 11.7 19.76 2.63
094432.33573536.1 BL 52.5 19.87 1.86
094441.47555752.9 BL? 54.5 19.89 24.67
100040.67531911.7 BL? 13.9 20.36 2.02
103845.88392735.0 BL 12.1 19.23 7.09
113115.50023450.2 BL 22.4 18.53 13.29
120355.34581945.5 BL 14.2 18.57 41.81
125032.58021632.1 BL 14.1 19.21 468.49
130146.31441619.2 BL 38.8 18.64 53.64
135158.20554210.8 BL 40.6 19.22 83.40
141208.23383521.6 BL? 13.3 20.16 3.35
164301.06322104.0 BL 25.1 18.51 22.21
165542.81324420.0 BL? 11.2 18.68 31.63
Table 1Objects with  milli-arcsec yr and Unknown Redshifts
Figure 5.— Sample SDSS spectra of objects rejected during manual inspection, boxcar smoothed with a width of 9. Top left: FIRST J102347.6003841 (SDSS J102347.68003841.1), a previously known cataclysmic variable (CV, see §3.2). This is the only CV recovered by our database query, and it was rejected during manual inspection based on emission line strength. Top right: SDSS J095842.64631845.5 (), an E+A galaxy (see §3.3). This object is rejected as a post star forming galaxy based on H absorption. Bottom left: SDSS J123525.15351242.6 (). This object is rejected as a broad absorption line quasar (BALQSO, see §3.6).
Figure 6.— Proper motions for 279 BL Lac candidates with ; these 279 candidates all have proper motion information available in the SDSS database, and 91% show  milli-arcsec year, consistent with little stellar contamination in our final sample. About half of the objects with  milli-arcsec year have reliable or tentative redshifts.

3.3. Radio Galaxies

Radio emitting galaxies are contaminants returned in relatively large numbers by our database query. Most contaminating radio galaxies are easily identified through emission lines with Å and are rejected during manual inspection. Some radio galaxies however can be more challenging to recognize. For example, some objects show spectra with a weak H/K break due to an increased blue continuum not from nuclear activity but rather from a recent episode of star formation (e.g., E+A ellipticals or other post-starburst galaxies.) Post-starburst galaxies with weak emission lines would formally pass our selection criteria. We therefore reject post-starburst galaxies if H shows a  larger than 5 Å in absorption14, and/or if Ca ii H+H is significantly stronger than Ca ii K (as suggested by Stocke et al. 1991 to reduce galaxy contamination in BL Lac samples). A sample spectrum of an E+A galaxy that is rejected during manual inspection based on strong H absorption is shown in the top right panel of Figure 5.

A small fraction of spectra might show small H/K breaks that are not weakened by either nuclear activity or star formation, but they could rather be passive elliptical galaxies with intrinsically small H/K breaks; this does not appear to be a strong source of contamination however, as Marchã et al. (1996) point out that the Dressler & Shectman (1987) sample of over 700 early type galaxies has a mean H/K break of  and less than 5% show . While requiring the more stringent (and historical) criterion of  for inclusion in BL Lac samples would essentially eliminate any concern of contamination from passive elliptical galaxies (e.g., see Stocke et al., 1991), Marchã et al. (1996) argue that doing so misses some weakly beamed BL Lacs. There appears to be a smooth transition between BL Lac and radio galaxy spectra, and as noted in §2, the exact Ca ii H/K break cutoff used to define BL Lacs is thus somewhat arbitrary. BL Lac selection criteria are commonly extended to include objects with , as this H/K break cutoff would include most beamed AGN, but it is not large enough to produce significant contamination from elliptical galaxies with intrinsically small H/K breaks. We therefore follow the bulk of the recent literature and use , acknowledging that this might allow a small number of contaminating passive elliptical galaxies into our sample. Polarization and variability follow-on of objects with  would be helpful for confirming their classification as BL Lacs.

3.4. Clusters of Galaxies

See Rector et al. (1999) for a discussion on recognizing BL Lacs from clusters of galaxies. We investigate in a preliminary fashion potential contamination from non-BL Lac objects residing in nearby clusters of galaxies by correlating our BL Lac candidates to the Koester et al. (2007) SDSS maxBCG cluster catalog. The Koester et al. catalog contains 13,823 photometrically selected clusters with velocity dispersions  km s from  over 7500 deg. Photometric redshifts are given for each cluster, which are estimated to be accurate to  from comparison to available spectroscopic redshifts. We perform the matching with a fixed projected physical linear aperture of radius 0.5 Mpc at the photometric redshift of each cluster. Among our BL Lacs, 12 higher confidence candidates and 1 lower confidence candidate match to a maxBCG cluster. Of these 13 matches, 4 of the BL Lac candidates have no reliable redshift, 5 have reliable redshifts within  of the cluster’s photometric redshift, and 4 have reliable, tentative or lower limit redshifts larger than the cluster’s photometric redshift by at least 0.01. Table 2 gives the SDSS name for these 13 BL Lac candidates, our classification (‘BL’ or ‘BL?’), the angular separation between the BL Lac position and the brightest cluster galaxy, each BL Lac candidate’s spectroscopic redshift, and each cluster’s photometric redshift. All objects pass our selection criteria, even the more stringent constraints aimed toward rejecting post star forming radio galaxies (see §3.3); only 3 objects have measured Ca ii H/K break depressions  (the largest is 0.35). Thus, contamination from post star forming galaxies or radio galaxies with weak H/K breaks residing in clusters is likely small, and we retain all 13 objects in our final sample. BL Lacs tend to avoid rich clusters at low redshifts (, see Wurtz et al., 1997), and it is therefore reassuring that only a very small number of BL Lac candidates were returned by our cluster correlation.

We estimate the expected number of chance superpositions by randomly offsetting our BL Lac positions by  (the largest angular radius used in our original correlation was ) and recorrelating to the cluster catalog 10 times; we find 5 chance superpositions on average, and it is reasonable that the 8 BL Lac candidates in Table 2 with unknown redshifts or redshifts very different than each cluster’s redshift could be chance superpositions. Some of the 13 matches (especially those with a BL Lac redshift similar to a cluster redshift) might be examples of clusters of galaxies hosting a BL Lac.

SDSS Name Class. Sep. BL Lac Cluster
(J2000) (arcsec)
082814.20415351.9 BL 27 0.226 0.224
091848.58021321.8 BL 82 0.278
092642.18080300.2 BL? 186 0.116
101504.13492600.6 BL 126 0.151
113118.63580858.8 BL 147 0.360 0.167
122008.29343121.7 BL 64 0.87015 0.246
124700.72442318.8 BL 63 1.812 0.197
134105.10395945.4 BL 128 0.172 0.176
144248.28120040.2 BL 52 0.163 0.159
161541.21471111.7 BL 68 0.199 0.205
161823.58363201.7 BL 173 0.73416 0.159
162259.26440142.9 BL 210 0.122
163726.66454749.0 BL 73 0.192 0.203
Table 2Matches to maxBCG Clusters

3.5.  BL Lac Candidates and Weak-Lined Quasars

A follow-on polarization study of a subset of 42 of the Collinge et al. (2005) optically-selected BL Lac candidates revealed all nine  objects in that subset lack strong optical polarization (e.g., below 3%), thereby raising doubts as to whether they should be classifed as BL Lacs (Smith et al., 2007). We note that these results might not be entirely relevant to our sample, as only two of their nine  objects with follow-on polarization observations were radio sources. However, SDSS has revealed a number of similar objects at very high redshift, often termed weak-lined quasars, whose optical spectra lack strong emission (like BL Lacs), but which also display low polarization and a range of radio emission extending to quite low values (unlike BL Lacs); see Fan et al. (1999), Anderson et al. (2001), and Shemmer et al. (2006) for discussions on SDSS weak-lined quasars.

Thirty-one of our higher confidence BL Lac candidates and 14 of our lower confidence BL Lac candidates have (assuming tentative redshifts are correct.) Of our 31 higher confidence BL Lac candidates with reliable or tentative redshifts at , there are 5 that appear relatively radio weak (), suggesting that some of our high- candidates are indeed atypical of BL Lacs. Given our lack of polarization information we retain all objects. Polarization, variability, and multiwavelength investigations would be enlightening in confirming their classification.

3.6. Broad Absorption Line Quasars

We also recover several objects that formally fulfill our BL Lac criteria but are rejected upon manual inspection of their spectra as obvious broad absorption line quasars (BALQSOs, see bottom left panel of Figure 5).

3.7. An Unusual Class of Radio Sources

Hall et al. (2002) discovered two objects, SDSS J010540.75-003313.9 (1.179) and SDSS J220445.26+003141.9 (1.353), that show a very strange continuum drop-off blueward of a Mg ii absorption doublet; both are FIRST radio objects and neither are RASS X-ray sources. Both objects also show broad H in the near-infrared (Hall et al. 2008, in preparation). Hall et al. were aware of only 2 other objects previously reported in the literature with similar spectra, FBQS 1503+2330 (0.492) and FBQS 1055+3124 (0.404), both of which are also radio sources (White et al., 2000). Initially, no entirely satisfactory explanation was found for these unusual objects (see Hall et al.’s §6.1). However, one promising possible explanation suggested by Hall et al. is that they are extraordinarily unusual BALQSOs.

Interestingly, both the Hall et al. objects, SDSS J0105-0033 and SDSS J2204+0031, were recovered in our database query, and they formally satisfy all our BL Lac selection criteria. Our database query also revealed two additional radio sources whose SDSS spectra appear very similar and may be related: SDSS J130941.36+112540.1 (1.362) and SDSS J145045.56+461504.2 (1.877). Both are again FIRST sources, and again neither new object matches to a RASS source. The SDSS spectra of all four objects are shown in Figure 7, and Table 3 displays some basic properties. Redshifts for SDSS J0105-0033 and SDSS J2204+0031 are taken from Hall et al., while the redshifts for SDSS J1309+1125 and SDSS J1450+4615 are estimates based on Mg ii absorption.

Neither of the two new cases, SDSS J1309+1125 and SDSS J1450+4615, ultimately survive as BL Lac candidates during manual inspection: they both appear to show broad emission features near Al iii/C iii. We hence exclude the two new cases from our final BL Lac catalog, although we retain the original two Hall et al. objects as lower confidence BL Lac candidates. Whatever their nature, this set of radio objects are almost certainly AGN and very rare.

Figure 7.— Spectra of mysterious radio AGN (possibly highly unusual BALQSOs; Hall et al., 2002) as described in §3.7. Spectra are ordered by increasing redshift and boxcar smoothed with a width of 9. None match to a RASS X-ray source. Top left: SDSS J010540.75003313.9 (), published in Hall et al. This object formally passes our selection criteria, and so it is included as a lower confidence BL Lac candidate, though Hall et al. have suggested it may be a BALQSO of extreme type. Top right: SDSS J220445.26003141.9 (), published in Hall et al. This object again formally passes our selection criteria, and so it is included in our final catalog as a lower confidence BL Lac candidate. Bottom left: SDSS J130941.36112540.1 (). This new object appears similar, but was ultimately rejected as a BL Lac based on emission line strength. Bottom right: SDSS J145045.56461504.2 (). This new object was also rejected based on emission line strength.
SDSS Name redshift Radio Flux
(J2000) (mag) (mag) (mag) (mag) (mag) (mJy)
010540.75003313.917 1.179 20.16 19.04 17.98 17.73 17.49 4.84
130941.36112540.1 1.362 21.23 19.75 18.57 17.89 17.82 0.83
145045.56461504.2 1.877 21.00 20.31 19.54 18.80 18.30 1.51
220445.26003141.918 1.353 19.78 18.65 17.35 16.76 16.65 3.03
Table 3Active Galactic Nuclei with Unusual Spectra

4. Final Sample

Table 4 summarizes the number of objects in our final sample, the number with X-ray detections in RASS, and some highlighted redshift information. Thus far, from this and previous programs, the SDSS spectroscopic survey has already provided several hundred new BL Lac candidate identifications; about 60% of our sample were previously identified as BL Lacs by the SDSS (primarily in Collinge et al. 2005 or Anderson et al. 2007), and 20% of our sample were originally discovered by non-SDSS observations. Only 33 of our BL Lac candidates appear as quasars in the DR5 Quasar Catalog (Schneider et al., 2007). Although the DR5 Quasar Catalog does not include BL Lac objects, some overlap is expected between our BL Lac sample and the quasar catalog, as our BL Lac definition can include some very weak emission line objects. Distributions of observed radio flux densities at 1.4 GHz (in mJy), observed optical magnitudes (sdss ), and estimated absorbed X-ray fluxes from 0.1-2.4 keV (in erg s cm, see §2.5) for all 501 BL Lac candidates are shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8.— Flux distributions for all 501 BL Lac candidates in our sample. Top left: Log radio flux densities (in mJy) from FIRST at 1.4 GHz. Top right: Optical magnitudes (sdss ). Bottom left: Estimated log absorbed X-ray fluxes from 0.1-2.4 keV in erg s cm (see §2.5). Open histogram: All 501 candidates. Shaded histogram: Limits (denoted with arrows) for the 271 objects lacking RASS detections.

Data are given in Tables 5 and 6 for our 501 BL Lac candidates (426 higher confidence and 75 lower confidence candidates.) Table 5 presents primarily empirical information. Column (1) gives the SDSS source name (SDSS JHHMMSS.SSDDMMSS.S), sorted by right ascension. Column (2) gives our classification as a higher confidence BL Lac (‘BL’) or as a lower confidence BL Lac (‘BL?’) candidate. Column (3) notes whether each source is identified as a BL Lac in NED19. ‘S’ means the source is listed as a BL Lac discovered by SDSS, ‘O’ means the source is listed as a BL Lac discovered by a survey other than SDSS, and ‘N’ means it is not listed as a BL Lac in NED. Columns (4) and (5) give the SDSS coordinates RA and Dec (J2000). Columns (6)-(10) present ,,,, psf magnitudes. Column (11) gives the estimated redshift of each object (unknown redshifts are left blank), and column (12) presents our redshift flag: ‘R’ means we believe the redshift to be reliable, ‘T’ is a tentative redshift, ‘L’ means the redshift is derived from foreground absorbing gas and should be interpreted as a lower limit, and ‘U’ designates an unknown redshift. Column (13) gives each object’s measured H/K break depression C as derived by us (not the SDSS pipeline measure.) Column (14) gives the FIRST integrated radio flux listed in the SDSS DR5 database in mJy (Becker et al., 1995; White et al., 1997). Finally, additional comments may appear in column (15). We explain in column (15) why each lower confidence candidate is classified as ‘BL?’: ‘lowSN’ signifies the optical spectrum has measured signal-to-noise ; ‘contam?’ means the spectrum might be contaminated by a nearby source; and ‘ew’ marks the objects with unclear continua, and emission lines can have measured  larger or smaller than 5 Å depending on where one chooses to measure the continuum near each line. Not all SDSS discovered BL Lac candidates from Collinge et al. (2005) and Anderson et al. (2007) are identified as BL Lacs in NED. We thus mark such objects in column (3) as not being listed in NED as a BL Lac, but we identify all objects that appear in Collinge et al. and/or Anderson et al. as ‘C05’ and ‘A07’, respectively, in column (15).

Table 6 emphasizes derived multiwavelength information for each object (see §2.5). We repeat SDSS source names and redshifts in columns (1) and (2) for easy reference to Table 5. The 1.4 GHz FIRST integrated radio flux density (in mJy) is repeated in column (3), with the corresponding 5 GHz rest-frame monochromatic luminosity in column (4). Column (5) gives the extinction corrected optical magnitude in the SDSS filter whose center is closest to rest-frame 5000 Å, taken from the  filter for objects with unknown redshift. Column (6) gives the estimated monochromatic optical luminosity at rest-frame 5000 Å. Column (7) is an X-ray match flag, where ‘Y’ means there is a match to a RASS source, and ‘N’ means there is no match. Column (8) gives the X-ray count rate (in counts s) from 0.1-2.4 keV (Voges et al., 1999). The estimated monochromatic unabsorbed X-ray luminosity at rest-frame 1 keV is given in column (9). All monochromatic luminosities have units erg s Hz. The X-ray count rates and luminosities presented in columns (8) and (9) are upper limits if the X-ray match flag in column (7) is set to N. Finally, columns (10), (11), and (12) give the logarithmic broad-band spectral indices , , and  respectively. Lower limits to  and  are given if the X-ray match flag is set to ‘N’.

As discussed in §2.2.1, 171 of the Collinge et al. (2005) optically selected probable BL Lac candidates that match to a FIRST radio source are recovered by our DR5 database query and additionally pass our signal-to-noise cut. Two of these objects however are not included in our final sample. One object is rejected because it shows broad H in an H/[N ii] complex with blended  slightly larger than 5 Å. The second object is rejected because it shows Si iv+O iv with  slightly larger than 5 Å.

The Anderson et al. (2007) X-ray selected sample contains 244 objects that match to a FIRST source in the DR5 spectroscopic database. (After a cross-correlation to NVSS, only 7 objects in the Anderson et al. sample lack radio detections.) Our database query recovers 241 of these objects, of which 223 additionally pass our cut. Only 2 of these 223 objects do not appear in our final radio-selected sample. Both these objects were rejected here based on [O ii] emission with  slightly larger than 5 Å. Thus, our final sample reassuringly contains essentially all FIRST sources previously identified as BL Lac candidates from SDSS spectroscopy.

Number of BL Number of BL? Total
Number of Objects 426 75 501
Match to RASS Source 217 13 230
Reliable Redshifts 166 29 195
Tentative Redshifts 58 17 75
Lower Limit Redshifts 32 5 37
Unknown Redshifts 170 24 194
Table 4 Basic Sample Statistics
SDSS Name in RA Dec Red.
(J2000) Class. NED? (J2000) (J2000) Redshift Flag (mJy) Comm.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15)
000157.23103117.3 BL N 0.48850 -10.52148 20.66 19.74 18.77 18.26 17.86 0.252 R 0.367 32.97
000257.17002447.3 BL? N 0.73824 -0.41315 21.10 20.63 19.89 19.22 18.85 0.523 R 0.289 159.13 lowSN
002142.25090044.4 BL N 5.42608 -9.01234 20.15 19.79 19.32 18.82 18.52 0.648 T 0.217 41.96 C05
002200.95000657.9 BL O 5.50396 0.11610 20.48 20.04 19.28 18.87 18.55 0.306 R 0.357 1.73 C05,A07
003808.50001336.5 BL N 9.53543 0.22683 20.15 19.70 19.30 18.96 18.63 U 89.71 C05

Note. – The complete version of this table is in the electronic edition of the journal. The printed version contains only a sample.

Table 5Observed Parameters of BL Lac Candidates
SDSS Name X-ray X-ray Counts
(J2000) Redshift (mJy) Match Flag per Sec
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
000157.23103117.3 0.252 32.97 31.82 18.65 29.29 N 0.019 25.91 0.50 1.30 0.77
000257.17002447.3 0.523 159.13 33.15 19.15 29.76 N 0.015 26.63 0.67 1.20 0.85
002142.25090044.4 0.648 41.96 32.75 18.46 30.16 N 0.018 26.94 0.51 1.24 0.76
002200.95000657.9 0.306 1.73 30.71 19.21 29.27 Y 0.097 26.85 0.28 0.93 0.50
003808.50001336.5 89.71 32.40 19.25 29.23 N 0.019 26.02 0.63 1.23 0.83

Note. – The complete version of this table is in the electronic edition of the journal. The printed version contains only a sample.

Table 6Derived Parameters of BL Lac Candidates

5. Discussion

The following analysis conservatively focuses on the 426 higher confidence BL Lac candidates. Results remain virtually unchanged when all 501 candidates are included.

Figure 9 shows a histogram for the 256 higher confidence BL Lac candidates with either reliable, tentative or lower limit redshifts. A sizable fraction (30%) have redshifts larger than 0.5 (18% with ), making this a useful sample for testing BL Lac properties at . All objects with  have a measured Ca ii H/K break, but note that we observe a sharp decrease at  in the distribution of measured redshifts. It is possible that some objects with unknown redshifts are examples of highly beamed nearby BL Lacs; however, given the likelihood of detecting host galaxy spectral features from lower redshift objects, it is probable that a significant fraction of these objects are higher redshift between . (Spectra with  would start to show Ly forests.) Also, highly beamed objects require a low probability geometry and may therefore be less likely to be recovered at lower redshifts where a smaller volume is probed.

Figure 9.— Redshift distribution of the 256 higher confidence candidates with reliable, tentative or lower limit redshifts. All redshifts with  are derived from host galaxy features. The relative number of objects with measured redshifts decreases drastically for redshifts larger than . However, a sizable fraction (30%) still have measured redshifts larger than 0.5, making this a useful sample for constraining higher redshift BL Lac properties.

A color-color diagram for our 426 higher confidence BL Lac candidates is shown in Figure 10. Objects with RASS X-ray detections are marked as blue asterisks, and those lacking X-ray detections are shown as black circles. Note that X-ray detected and non-detected BL Lac candidates cover the same range of optical colors. That is, the types of BL Lacs that can show X-ray emission are not limited to one specific subclass. The dashed lines mark the region (, ) where Collinge et al. (2005) found most stellar contaminants in their optically selected BL Lac sample. We find only 11 objects in this “gri box”; none show significant proper motion and 8 have tentative or reliable extragalactic redshifts. This affords added confidence that any potential stellar contamination to our radio sample is extremely small, and it supports the notion that requiring multifrequency information improves BL Lac selection efficiency. However, we note that multifrequency approaches are not as capable of recovering potentially rare (if extant) and extremely interesting BL Lac sub-populations such as, for example, radio-quiet BL Lacs.

Figure 10.— Color-color diagram of our higher confidence BL Lacs. Black circles show higher confidence BL Lac candidates that do not match to a RASS X-ray source. Blue asterisks show higher confidence BL Lac candidates within 1 of a RASS source. We recover X-ray detections at all ranges of optical colors. The green star depicts the median colors of objects not showing a Ca ii H/K break in their spectra. The yellow triangle marks the median colors of objects with small measured H/K breaks . The red square indicates the median colors of objects showing larger H/K breaks . As expected, objects with more prominent host galaxy features show redder optical colors on average. The dashed lines mark the “gri box” identified by Collinge et al. (2005) where most stellar contaminants would be expected. Eight of the 11 objects recovered in this box have measured redshifts, supporting our conclusion of little stellar contamination to our sample. Three objects with  and/or  due to poor flux measurements are omitted from this figure.

Spectra showing larger Ca ii H/K depressions tend to have redder optical colors on average. The red square in Figure 10 marks the median colors of objects whose spectra show larger Ca ii H/K depressions (), the yellow triangle marks the median colors of spectra showing smaller depressions (), and the green star marks the median colors of spectra that do not show H/K breaks (either because the break is completely washed out by the AGN flux or because the H/K break is redshifted out of the optical spectrum.) This trend can be seen more directly by examining H/K break strength vs. color for our higher confidence candidates (Figure 11). Our optical spectra are the combination of two distinct radiation sources: the host galaxy (typically an elliptical) and a typically blue power law continuum from the AGN. In the standard BL Lac beaming paradigm, objects with their jets pointed less directly at the observer show less non-thermal continua (due to less Doppler boosting), and therefore they exhibit more prominent host galaxy features and redder optical colors. The open histogram at the bottom of Figure 11 shows all 192 higher confidence candidates for which we have no measured H/K break (either because the H/K break is redshifted out of the optical spectrum, or because the object has an unknown redshift so it is impossible to locate 4000 Å rest-frame.) The objects without a measured H/K break tend to be bluer on average than those with a larger break (e.g., ). Also note in Figure 11 that X-ray detected objects are shown as filled circles in the top panel and as a filled histogram in the bottom panel; we detect X-rays from objects at all ranges of  and H/K break strength.

Figure 11.— Ca ii H/K depression strength  vs.  for our higher confidence candidates. Top panel: objects (234) with a measured H/K break. The filled circles depict objects that match to a RASS X-ray source, while the open circles show those without an X-ray match. Bottom panel: objects without a measured H/K break either because 4000 Å rest-fame is redshifted out of the SDSS spectra or because the objects have unknown redshifts. Open histogram: all 192 higher confidence candidates lacking a measured H/K break. The shaded histogram shows the 79 objects with an X-ray detection in RASS that also lack H/K break measurements. Objects with more prominent host galaxy contamination (i.e., larger ) tend to be redder, as expected in the standard beaming paradigm for the BL Lac phenomenon. Also note that objects with X-ray detections are recovered at all ranges of  and . Two objects with  due to poor flux measurements are omitted from this plot.

The standard beaming paradigm is further supported through an anti-correlation between H/K break strength and the log specific luminosity, shown in Figure 12 for the X-ray (top left), optical (top right), and radio (bottom left). We find linear Pearson correlation coefficients  and  for the logarithm of radio and optical luminosities respectively; both anti-correlations are significant at the 99.999% level. That is, BL Lacs appear to be more luminous as we view them more directly along their jet axes. Even though there is an observed trend, the large scatter in Figure 12 would seem to prohibit the use of H/K break as a sole proxy for predicting accurate luminosities. Also, while our sample generally supports the beaming scenario, we note that it is still possible that a minority of sources might have alternative explanations for exhibiting BL Lac type characteristics. Detailed investigations of such a possible (albeit likely rare) sub-population are beyond the scope of this paper.

We do not show the luminosity distributions in Figure 12 for objects without a measured H/K break, as only 22 such objects have measured redshifts. The average X-ray, optical and radio luminosities of 10, 10, and 10 (erg s Hz) for these 22 objects however do lie toward toward the bright end of their respective luminosity distributions, as expected. We note though that all 22 objects are high redshift () and therefore may be observationally biased toward higher luminosities.

The scatter in optical luminosity vs. H/K break is smaller than in the radio or X-ray, as is expected for two optical measures. BL Lacs can have diverse SEDs, as the peak of the synchrotron component can fall within a range spanning close to 10 orders of magnitude in frequency (e.g., see Nieppola et al., 2006). For example, two BL Lac jets with identical optical brightnesses can have very different radio (or X-ray) luminosities depending on the specific shape of each object’s SED. This plausibly introduces excess scatter into the radio and X-ray panels in Figure 12, especially since we use the same spectral indices for all objects when estimating luminosities. Also, given the non-simultaneity of our multifrequency data, variability is likely responsible for some of the observed scatter.

Figure 12.— Multiwavelength luminosities vs. Ca ii H/K break strength for our higher confidence candidates. Filled circles: objects that match to a RASS X-ray source. Open circles: objects without an X-ray match (with arrows designating X-ray limits when appropriate.) Top left: logarithm of specific X-ray luminosity at 1 keV vs. Ca ii H/K break strength . Top right: logarithm of specific optical luminosity at 5000 Å vs. . Bottom left: logarithm of specific radio luminosity at 5 GHz vs. . BL Lacs tend to appear more luminous at all observed frequencies when viewed more directly along their jet axes (i.e., for smaller values of ). Bottom right: logarithm of radio to optical specific luminosity ratio vs. . The large range of radio to optical luminosity ratios does not appear to be an orientation effect and rather probably reflects AGN jet physics (e.g., variability and/or differing SEDs among BL Lac objects.) Note that we obtain X-ray detections at all values of H/K break strength and radio and optical luminosities.

The bottom right panel of Figure 12 shows the log of the ratio of radio to optical specific luminosity vs. measured H/K break. Here, we observe no obvious linear trend (a 28% two-sided probability of randomly finding a stronger correlation), but we do see a relatively large scatter. The large scatter likely confirms either variability and/or that BL Lacs do not have a universal SED. We omit objects lacking H/K break measurements for consistency with the other panels. The lack of an obvious observed trend with H/K break strength suggests that the large observed range of radio to optical luminosity ratios is not a strong orientation effect and perhaps reflects AGN jet physics.

The bottom right panel of Figure 12 also illustrates one reason that multifrequency surveys should be well matched in depth. A radio survey that is shallower than an optical survey, for example, will be biased toward recovering objects with larger radio to optical luminosity ratios (i.e., extreme LBLs). One needs both a deep radio and a deep optical survey to recover objects toward the bottom of the bottom right panel of Figure 12 and to obtain a sample with luminosity ratio distributions more representative of the underlying population.

Figures 10-12 demonstrate that BL Lacs display continuous distributions in their properties, supporting the notion that the observed dichotomy between radio and X-ray selected BL Lacs in the 1 Jy and EMSS samples was indeed plausibly a selection effect induced by small sample size and bright survey flux limits. This is further supported when examining the  plane in Figure 13 (which shows our 426 higher confidence BL Lac candidates.) Blue squares represent objects with X-ray detections; arrows designate limits on  for objects lacking a RASS detection. Here, large (small) values of  () correspond to being radio (X-ray) bright. As expected, we observe a continuous transition between LBL and HBL objects20, with plenty of IBL-type objects bridging the transition. Although this preliminary analysis seems to support the notion of a single BL Lac population, there are still some differences between historically radio selected and X-ray selected BL Lacs that require further attention. For example, XBLs appear to have more starlight contamination from their host galaxies, lower polarization levels, and constant polarization position angles (see §1). Also, XBLs and RBLs might have very different cosmological evolution.

We see an obvious and expected bias toward RASS detected sources preferentially filling the HBL parameter space in Figure 13: 83% of X-ray emitters appear to be HBLs, likely due to the relatively high flux limit of the RASS survey. Perhaps counter intuitively however, 66% of our entire higher confidence radio sample (and 47% of objects lacking RASS detections) still have broad-band colors indicative of HBLs. This may be an artifact of the SDSS spectroscopic target selection algorithms, which are biased toward selecting objects near RASS sources for spectroscopy (see §2 and Figure 1). Keep in mind however that the above percentages are tentative for several reasons. About half our data points only have limits on their X-ray luminosites; the non-simultaneity of our multiwavelength data and our monochromatic luminosity estimates also introduce excess scatter.

We also note X-ray detections from some LBLs in Figure 13. That is, as is similarly observed in Figures 10-12, X-ray emission is detected from objects at nearly all ranges of observed parameters (objects with  being the notable exception, see below.) While it is certainly plausible that some fraction of radio bright objects lacking X-ray detections are real examples of extreme LBLs, the recovery of X-ray sources at all parameters suggests that we do not have evidence for a significant population of X-ray quiet BL Lacs. Deeper X-ray observations are necessary for testing this assertion, and selection effects and survey biases need to be examined thoroughly.

There is a small population of 7 higher confidence candidates with extremely small , of which only a single (low-redshift) object shows X-ray emission, implying that some BL Lacs might have atypical broad-band colors. However, as described in §3.5, five of these objects have redshifts , potentially making their classification as BL Lac candidates suspicious. The other 26 objects in our higher confidence BL Lac candidate sample with , however, do not show atypical broad band colors. We include all  objects in our sample without prejudice, as all formally pass our BL Lac criteria; follow-on polarization, variability, and multiwavelength studies of these higher redshift BL Lac candidates (or weak lined quasars) would be useful.

Figure 13.— Broad-band spectral indices  vs. . Radio brightness increases toward the top, and X-ray brightness increases toward the left. The blue squares show objects that match to a RASS X-ray source while the filled circles depict objects without an X-ray match (with arrows designating limits). We again obtain X-ray detections at essentially all ranges of parameters (with the radio weak  tail being the notable exception). We observe a continuous distribution of broad-band spectral indices with plenty of IBL and LBL-type objects. However, we do see a potential bias toward recovering HBLs () from SDSS spectroscopy, a perhaps unexpected result for a radio-selected sample. This is maybe an artifact from the SDSS spectroscopic target algorithms.

Looking forward to future applications, the very large size of our homogeneous SDSS/FIRST selected sample may (when coupled with a detailed understanding of selection issues) permit a number of subsequent BL Lac studies ranging from the potentially unusual evolution of the luminosity function of BL Lacs (e.g., Morris et al., 1991; Wolter et al., 1994; Bade et al., 1998; Rector et al., 2000; Rector & Stocke, 2001; Giommi et al., 2001; Beckmann et al., 2003; Padovani et al., 2007), to tests of the unification paradigm. As just one specific future application, consider the standard model that interprets BL Lacs as FR I radio galaxies with their jets pointed toward the observer. Ground and space-based observations that resolve BL Lac host galaxies tend to support this unification scheme at least for the majority of objects. An HST survey (primarily with WFPC2 SNAP observations) found strong direct evidence at lower redshifts supporting this scheme (Scarpa et al., 2000a; Urry et al., 2000; Falomo et al., 2000; Scarpa et al., 2000b). However, it is not yet clear whether it holds for every single BL Lac. Suggested modifications range from some fraction of BL Lacs being hosted by FR II radio galaxies (e.g., Owen et al., 1996; Wurtz et al., 1997; Rector & Stocke, 2001; Hardcastle et al., 2003) to some fraction being microlensed (e.g., Ostriker & Vietri, 1990; Stocke & Rector, 1997; Rector & Stocke, 2001); any requisite modifications are likely more significant at higher redshifts. Moreover, some caution may be appropriate when extrapolating the Urry et al. HST survey results to higher redshifts, as only 6 host galaxies with 0.5 were actually resolved due to limited WFPC2 SNAP exposure times. Even if one conservatively disregards our 75 lower confidence BL Lac candidates and all BL Lac candidates with , our sample still contains a sizable number (46) of higher confidence BL Lac candidates with confirmed  suitable for host galaxy investigations. If observed with current and upcoming HST instruments, our sample could potentially provide an important extension to the  regime of the well-established low redshift unification results.

6. Summary

We have assembled a 501 object sample of BL Lac candidates selected jointly from SDSS DR5 optical spectroscopy and FIRST radio imaging: there are 426 higher confidence candidates and 75 lower confidence candidates. All 501 objects emerge with homogeneous multi-wavelength data coverage from FIRST, SDSS and RASS. After imposing a signal to noise cut on the SDSS spectra, we require all emission features to have  Å and, if present, a Ca ii H/K depression . Special attention is given to remove radio galaxies, radio stars, broad absorption line quasars, and other weak-featured objects that might otherwise formally pass our selection criteria. Of particular interest, in addition to recovering 2 unusual radio AGN reported previously in Hall et al. (2002), we found 2 additional objects possibly of the same class.

We recover essentially all previous SDSS selected BL Lac candidates that match to FIRST sources in Collinge et al. (2005) and Anderson et al. (2007), increasing confidence in our selection technique. Of our 501 BL Lac candidates, approximately 80% are SDSS discoveries (including objects first reported by Anderson et al. 2003, Collinge et al. 2005, or Anderson et al. 2007).

Approximately 60% of our 501 BL Lac candidates have either a reliable redshift (derived from at least 2 spectral features at the same redshift), a tentative redshift (derived from a single emission line assumed to be Mg ii, or from multiple weak spectral features at the same redshift), or a redshift lower limit derived from common intervening absorption line doublets. Of our 256 higher confidence candidates with spectroscopic redshifts measured from SDSS spectroscopy, 30% have , and 18% have , making this an excellent sample for constraining higher redshift BL Lac properties.

Almost half of our higher confidence candidates match within to a RASS X-ray source. We find X-ray detections for BL Lacs at practically all ranges of parameter space (i.e., optical colors, multi-wavelength luminosities, H/K break strengths, etc.), suggesting that there is not a significant population of X-ray quiet BL Lacs. Perhaps surprisingly, only about one-third of our higher confidence radio-selected candidates have broad-band spectral indices indicative of LBLs. This may be an artifact of the SDSS spectroscopy targeting algorithms that could bias spectroscopic observations in favor of objects near X-ray sources. However, we still recover a large number of IBL/LBL-type objects; follow-up of this sample will therefore probe a wide range of BL Lac physics.

Our sample supports the general concurrence that BL Lacs display a continuous distribution of properties, but we stress that the historical differences between XBLs and RBLs still need to be accounted for and require further attention. A preliminary analysis seems consistent with the standard beaming model, in that more highly beamed (i.e., more luminous) objects show weaker host galaxy features. We also see indirect evidence for variability and/or diverse SED shapes, and we note that multi-wavelength surveys should be well-matched in depth to recover unbiased BL Lac samples.

Our SDSS/FIRST BL Lac sample constitutes one of the largest homogeneous samples to date, with the attractive attribute that all objects emerge with the same high-quality radio, optical, and X-ray data. A thorough investigation of the selection effects that shape this sample’s composition may allow follow-on studies to place useful constraints on BL Lac properties ranging from evolution to unification models, especially extending to the high-redshift tail of the BL Lac population.

We gratefully thank the referee for providing excellent suggestions for improving this manuscript. R.M. Plotkin and S.F. Anderson acknowledge support from NASA/ADP grant NNG05GC45G. Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. The SDSS Web Site is http://www.sdss.org/. The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the American Museum of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of Basel, Cambridge University, Case Western Reserve University, University of Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, Johns Hopkins University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.

Footnotes

  1. affiliation: Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; plotkin@astro.washington.edu, anderson@astro.washington.edu
  2. affiliation: Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; plotkin@astro.washington.edu, anderson@astro.washington.edu
  3. affiliation: Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
  4. affiliation: Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
  5. affiliation: Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstrasse, Postfach 1312, D-85741, Garching, Germany
  6. affiliation: Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania Sate University, 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA
  7. affiliation: Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; plotkin@astro.washington.edu, anderson@astro.washington.edu
  8. affiliation: Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M1, Canada
  9. affiliation: Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics and the Enrico Fermi Institute, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
  10. slugcomment: Accepted for Publication in the Astronomical Journal: March 25, 2008
  11. Note that this issue is somewhat alleviated by using  as the H/K break cutoff instead of the more restrictive value of 0.25 used in some older samples.
  12. IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.
  13. The broad-band spectral index, for , is defined as . Here, , , and , where , , and  are the specific luminosities (per unit frequency) at 5 GHz, 5000 Å, and 1 keV respectively.
  14. H absorption is a common proxy for post-starbust galaxies (e.g., Goto et al., 2003).
  15. redshift is a lower limit
  16. tentative redshift
  17. Discovered by Hall et al. (2002)
  18. Discovered by Hall et al. (2002)
  19. The NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
  20. HBLs are commonly defined as corresponding to  with the X-ray flux in erg s cm and the radio flux in Jy (Padovani & Giommi, 1995b). The dividing line is also sometimes quoted as the similar  where both fluxes are in Jy (Wurtz, 1994; Perlman et al., 1996).

References

  1. Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 634
  2. Anderson, S. F., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 503
  3. —. 2003, AJ, 126, 2209
  4. —. 2007, AJ, 133, 313
  5. Bade, N., Beckmann, V., Douglas, N. G., Barthel, P. D., Engels, D., Cordis, L., Nass, P., & Voges, W. 1998, A&A, 334, 459
  6. Becker, R. H., White, R. L., & Helfand, D. J. 1995, ApJ, 450, 559
  7. Beckmann, V., Engels, D., Bade, N., & Wucknitz, O. 2003, A&A, 401, 927
  8. Blandford, R. D., & Rees, M. J. 1978, in Pitt. Conf. on BL Lac Obj., Proceedings. (A79-30026 11-90), University of Pittsburgh, 328–341
  9. Bond, H. E., White, R. L., Becker, R. H., & O’Brien, M. S. 2002, PASP, 114, 1359
  10. Brinkmann, W., Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A., Voges, W., Siebert, J., Becker, R. H., Brotherton, M. S., White, R. L., & Gregg, M. D. 2000, A&A, 356, 445
  11. Browne, I. W. A., & Marchã, M. J. M. 1993, MNRAS, 261, 795
  12. Caccianiga, A., Maccacaro, T., Wolter, A., della Ceca, R., & Gioia, I. M. 1999, ApJ, 513, 51
  13. Caccianiga, A., Maccacaro, T., Wolter, A., Della Ceca, R., & Gioia, I. M. 2002a, ApJ, 566, 181
  14. Caccianiga, A., Marchã, M. J., Antón, S., Mack, K.-H., & Neeser, M. J. 2002b, MNRAS, 329, 877
  15. Chen, L. E., Xie, G. Z., Ren, J. Y., Zhou, S. B., & Ma, L. 2006, ApJ, 637, 711
  16. Collinge et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 2542
  17. Dressler, A., & Shectman, S. A. 1987, AJ, 94, 899
  18. Eisenstein, D. J., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2267
  19. Falomo, R., Scarpa, R., Treves, A., & Urry, C. M. 2000, ApJ, 542, 731
  20. Fan, X., et al. 1999, ApJ, 526, L57
  21. Fischer, J.-U., Hasinger, G., Schwope, A. D., Brunner, H., Boller, T., Trumper, J., Voges, W., & Neizvestny, S. 1998, Astronomische Nachrichten, 319, 347
  22. Fruscione, A., et al. 2006, in Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems. Proceedings of the SPIE, 6270, 62701V
  23. Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748
  24. Giommi, P., Menna, M. T., & Padovani, P. 1999, MNRAS, 310, 465
  25. Giommi, P., Pellizzoni, A., Perri, M., & Padovani, P. 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser. 227: Blazar Demographics and Physics, 227
  26. Giommi, P., Piranomonte, S., Perri, M., & Padovani, P. 2005, A&A, 434, 385
  27. Goto, T., et al. 2003, PASJ, 55, 771
  28. Gunn, J. E., et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 3040
  29. —. 2006, AJ, 131, 2332
  30. Hall, P. B., et al. 2002, ApJS, 141, 267
  31. Hardcastle, M. J., Worrall, D. M., Birkinshaw, M., & Canosa, C. M. 2003, MNRAS, 338, 176
  32. Jannuzi, B. T., Smith, P. S., & Elston, R. 1994, ApJ, 428, 130
  33. Ivezić, Ž., et al. 2004, Astronomische Nachrichten, 325, 583
  34. Kimball, A. E., & Ivezić, Ž. 2008, AJ, submitted
  35. Kock, A., Meisenheimer, K., Brinkmann, W., Neumann, M., & Siebert, J. 1996, A&A, 307, 745
  36. Koester, B. P., et al. 2007, ApJ, 660, 239
  37. Kollgaard, R. I. 1994, Vistas in Astronomy, 38, 29
  38. Kühr, H., & Schmidt, G. D. 1990, AJ, 99, 1
  39. Landt, H., Padovani, P., & Giommi, P. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 945
  40. Landt, H., Padovani, P., Perlman, E. S., Giommi, P., Bignall, H., & Tzioumis, A. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 757
  41. Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A. 1997, PASP, 109, 341
  42. Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A., Kollgaard, R. I., Ciardullo, R., Feigelson, E. D., Brinkmann, W., & Siebert, J. 1998, ApJS, 118, 127
  43. Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A., Kollgaard, R. I., Feigelson, E. D., Brinkmann, W., & Siebert, J. 1999, ApJ, 525, 127
  44. Londish, D., Croom, S. M., Heidt, J., Boyle, B. J., Sadler, E. M., Whiting, M., Rector, T. A., Pursimo, T., & Chynoweth, K. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 556
  45. Maccacaro, T., Caccianiga, A., della Ceca, A., Wolter, A., & Gioia, I. M. 1998, Astronomische Nachrichten, 319, 15
  46. Marchã, M. J. M., & Browne, I. W. A. 1995, MNRAS, 275, 951
  47. Marchã, M. J. M., Browne, I. W. A., Impey, C. D., & Smith, P. S. 1996, MNRAS, 281, 425
  48. Morris, S. L., Stocke, J. T., Gioia, I. M., Schild, R. E., Wolter, A., Maccacaro, T., & della Ceca, R. 1991, ApJ, 380, 49
  49. Mukai, K. 1993, Legacy, 3, 21
  50. Munn, J. A., et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 3034
  51. Nass, P., Bade, N., Kollgaard, R. I., Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A., Reimers, D., & Voges, W. 1996, A&A, 309, 419
  52. Nieppola, E., Tornikoski, M., & Valtaoja, E. 2006, A&A, 445, 441
  53. Ostriker, J. P., & Vietri, M. 1990, Nature, 344, 45
  54. Owen, F. N., Ledlow, M. J., & Keel, W. C. 1996, AJ, 111, 53
  55. Padovani, P., & Giommi, P. 1995a, MNRAS, 277, 1477
  56. —. 1995b, ApJ, 444, 567
  57. Padovani, P., Giommi, P., Landt, H., & Perlman, E. S. 2007, ApJ, 662, 182
  58. Perlman, E. S., Padovani, P., Giommi, P., Sambruna, R., Jones, L. R., Tzioumis, A., & Reynolds, J. 1998, AJ, 115, 1253
  59. Perlman, E. S., Padovani, P., Landt, H., Stocke, J. T., Costamante, L., Rector, T., Giommi, P., & Schachter, J. F. 2001, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 227, Blazar Demographics and Physics, ed. P. Padovani & C. M. Urry, 200
  60. Perlman, E. S., et al. 1996, ApJS, 104, 251
  61. Pier, J. R., Munn, J. A., Hindsley, R. B., Hennessy, G. S., Kent, S. M., Lupton, R. H., & Ivezić, Ž. 2003, AJ, 125, 1559
  62. Piranomonte, S., Perri, M., Giommi, P., Landt, H., & Padovani, P. 2007, A&A, 470, 787
  63. Rector, T. A., & Stocke, J. T. 2001, AJ, 122, 565
  64. Rector, T. A., Stocke, J. T., & Perlman, E. S. 1999, ApJ, 516, 145
  65. Rector, T. A., Stocke, J. T., Perlman, E. S., Morris, S. L., & Gioia, I. M. 2000, AJ, 120, 1626
  66. Richards, G. T., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 2945
  67. Sambruna, R. M. 1997, ApJ, 487, 536
  68. Sambruna, R. M., Maraschi, L., & Urry, C. M. 1996, ApJ, 463, 444
  69. Scarpa, R., Urry, C. M., Falomo, R., Pesce, J. E., & Treves, A. 2000a, ApJ, 532, 740
  70. Scarpa, R., Urry, C. M., Padovani, P., Calzetti, D., & O’Dowd, M. 2000b, ApJ, 544, 258
  71. Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
  72. Schneider, D. P., et al. 2007, AJ, 134, 102
  73. Shemmer, O., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 86
  74. Smith, P. S., Williams, G. G., Schmidt, G. D., Diamond-Stanic, A. M., & Means, D. L. 2007, ApJ, 663, 118
  75. Stark, A. A., Gammie, C. F., Wilson, R. W., Bally, J., Linke, R. A., Heiles, C., & Hurwitz, M. 1992, ApJS, 79, 77
  76. Stickel, M., Fried, J. W., Kuehr, H., Padovani, P., & Urry, C. M. 1991, ApJ, 374, 431
  77. Stocke, J. T., Morris, S. L., Gioia, I. M., Maccacaro, T., Schild, R., Wolter, A., Fleming, T. A., & Henry, J. P. 1991, ApJS, 76, 813
  78. Stocke, J. T., Morris, S. L., Gioia, I., Maccacaro, T., Schild, R. E., & Wolter, A. 1990, ApJ, 348, 141
  79. Stocke, J. T., Morris, S. L., Gioia, I. M., Maccacaro, T., Schild, R. E., & Wolter, A. 1989, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, Vol. 334, BL Lac Objects, ed. L. Maraschi, T. Maccacaro, & M.-H. Ulrich, 242
  80. Stocke, J. T., & Rector, T. A. 1997, ApJ, 489, L17
  81. Stoughton, C., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 485
  82. Strauss, M. A., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 1810
  83. Urry, C. M., & Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803
  84. Urry, C. M., Scarpa, R., O’Dowd, M., Falomo, R., Pesce, J. E., & Treves, A. 2000, ApJ, 532, 816
  85. Véron-Cetty, M.-P., & Véron, P. 2006, A&A, 455, 773
  86. Voges, W., et al. 1999, A&A, 349, 389
  87. —. 2000, IAU Circ., 7432
  88. White, R. L., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., & Gregg, M. D. 1997, ApJ, 475, 479
  89. White, R. L., et al. 2000, ApJS, 126, 133
  90. Wolter, A., Caccianiga, A., della Ceca, R., & Maccacaro, T. 1994, ApJ, 433, 29
  91. Wolter, A., Ciliegi, P., della Ceca, R., Gioia, I. M., Giommi, P., Henry, J. P., Maccacaro, T., Padovani, P., & Ruscica, C. 1997, MNRAS, 284, 225
  92. Wurtz, R., Stocke, J. T., Ellingson, E., & Yee, H. K. C. 1997, ApJ, 480, 547
  93. Wurtz, R. E. 1994, PhD thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder
  94. York, D. G., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
103474
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description